[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Yahoo may be heading into its final act as an independent company.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /news/ - Current News

Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
File: 1167489056441.jpg (24 KB, 300x365) Image search: [Google]
1167489056441.jpg
24 KB, 300x365
http://fortune.com/2015/12/02/5-notes-on-the-yahoo-sale/

http://www.wsj.com/article_email/yahoo-board-to-weigh-potential-sale-of-internet-business-sources-say-1449015461-lMyQjAxMTI1MjA0MjkwNjIyWj

>Today’s deal buzz is a Wall Street Journal story about how Yahoo’s board is “planning a series of meetings this week to consider selling off the company’s flagging Internet businesses and how to make the most of its valuable stake in Chinese e-commerce powerhouse Alibaba Group.”

>I’ve so far had a handful of conversations with folks who are either close to Yahoo YHOO 6.91% or potential bidders (including within the past hour), and here is what I’m hearing so far:

>1. Legit? Despite the WSJ portrayal, these are not meetings that are being specially called to discuss a sale. These are the company’s regularly-scheduled financial planning meetings. So of course an evaluation of strategic options will be included, particularly for a company under activist pressure that has recently lost so many senior executives.

>That said, a sale of “core Yahoo” — or at least a serious attempt — does seem likely, perhaps as early as Q1 2016.

>2. Financial sponsors? Private equity will certainly take a hard look, particularly those firms that had conducted due diligence back in 2011 (here’s a refresher). The real question, however, is if private equity could find enough leverage to make such a deal work. Big consumer tech deals are few and far between (is Skype the last?), and the pricing on this would be particularly tricky. Do you pay a premium to EBIDTA, even though the actual stock market is effectively valuing Yahoo’s core business (ex-Alibaba BABA 1.16% and cash on hand) at zero? If private equity were to buy, one would imagine it would do a lot of cutting, in order to grow a smaller core of homepage, Tumblr, news, sports and mail (i.e., cut to expand, destroy to create, etc.). Then try to flip it to a strategic.
>>
>3. Then who? Strategics are a better fit. Not only because they needn’t find the debt, but because they could make better immediate use of Yahoo’s large user base. Expect Comcast CMSCA 0.00% , AT&T T 0.44% and Verizon VZ -0.31% to have interest (yes, Verizon already bought AOL, but that was more for the ad biz).

>4. Not a break-up: Yahoo’s properties are so tightly integrated on the back-end — including the basic username/email indentifiers — that it would be very hard for the company to sell Sports to one party, Mail to another, etc.

>5. Marissa: At this point there is a good argument to be made that Yahoo originally needed more of a financial wizard than a product ace at the helm, but that’s all water under the bridge. There has been a lot of speculation over whether or not Mayer will keep her job, but it’s hard to imagine the board dumps her if it actively pursues a sale. Let the buyer decide who they want to run things. Promoting a board member to something like executive chair, on the other hand…
>>
So if Yahoo closes, what happens to Tumblr?
>>
>>4647
I think it might be more accurate to think of it as a rebranding and restructuring of Yahoo to AliBaba more than it is closing, but that depends on #3, if there are any companies waiting in the wings to snap up the bits and pieces they want to liquidate in the mean time.

This is another one of the original pre-1999 dotcom-bubble internet companies without a strong business model is biting the dust. It just reconfirms (for me at least) that most of those old companies were worthless to start with. Very few today remember sites like pets.com, WebCrawler.com, or HotWired.
>>
>>4662
>bits and pieces they want to liquidate in the mean time.
like Tumblr, I meant.*
>>
>>4662
I sure as hell remember the annoying hotwired commercials
>>
>>4637
related:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/12/02/yahoos-board-said-to-consider-selling-its-core-business/
>>
>>4662
>It just reconfirms (for me at least) that most of those old companies were worthless to start with.
Over a decade of successful business on the internet sounds like a great thing to me.
The internet is fast.
What was good 2 years ago is old shit now.
>>
>>4637

What's a "Yahoo?"

Wasn't that, like, an email service or something in 2001? They killed geocities, too, didn't they.
>>
>>5581
>thisisbait.png
Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.