>>38571
The fact that a 30ft Nessie can remain undiscovered for 67 years even after the hundreds of scans they have done is interesting.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/nation-now/2016/04/14/loch-ness-monster-found-prop-sherlock-holmes-movie-drone/83021040/

>it was just a prop and nothing more

literally nothing

>>38804
Yes but a 30 foot model of Nessie went undetected for decades after countless SONAR sweeps, that is the interesting part of the story.

How could they have missed it? What else have they missed?

>>38829
The prop didn't move. Because it's a fucking prop.

>>38832
And? SONAR isn't a motion tracker.

>>38838
It's easier for objects that lie on the bottom and remain still to blend in with the terrain. It's an old tactic that submarines would use to hide.

>>38829
>Yes but a 30 foot model of Nessie went undetected for decades after countless SONAR sweeps, that is the interesting part of the story.
>How could they have missed it? What else have they missed?

Doesn't work that way.

All you've proved is that it's possible for a dinosaur to hide in a lake.

Well everybody who isn't a complete retard already knew that, but it doesn't prove that one IS.

>>38838
Active sonar can detect motion depending on the equipped transducer.