BBC broadcaster forced off air during live transmision from the Houses of Parliament.
Protests surrounding huge cuts to disability welfare were being reported on until stopped. These cuts are broadly opposed by British public, protests are in a building paid for by the public and being telivised by a broadcast company funded by the public.
Is it just me or is this not ok? Discuss.
http://youtu.be/KX3w2vty3vs
>>33361
Bit like america then.
>>33361
Edgy.
>>33359
Why even cut disability wellfare so much ?
Does the government care more about imigrants than their disabled ?
Let public funding go towards stopping this, sure.
Is there not freedom of media?
>>33359
OK or not, anyone who thinks public television can be in any way impartial, is retarded. More often than not, public television is simply the government propaganda channel, or the private propaganda channel of one or more parties who managed to fill the leadership roles with their cronies.
It honestly amazes me how many people still hold up the BBC as this impartial, world-class reporting agency.
>>33408
This. The Fourth (or Fifth) Estate can't exist if it's subordinate to the bureaucracy.
>>33397
There is the only appearance of freedom of media
>>33397
Yes, but filming in the palace of Westminster is subject to pretty strict rules and regulations. They shouldn't really have been filming in the first place.
