The problem is women have the foundation to reproduce the species. Men don't, actually. If you took away all the males in the world women can still trick the system with DNA but if you took out all the women in the world, sure we have penises but without anything to plug them into the species will die. This is a dark truth that I fear women are on the verge of finding out.

>>23519
>If you took away all the males in the world women can still trick the system with DNAv (citation needed )

>sure we have penises but without anything to plug them into the species will die

uhm, not true. https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/06/12/artificial-wombs-the-coming-era-of-motherless-births/

also, nihilists need no one, male or female. all are losers. get off your high horse, and get high yourself and then pass it to the left side

>>23521
> pass it to the left side
Left testicle masturbation?!

>>23519
>Non-Sequitor the Paragraph

What mansplaining (stupid word) should actually mean in theory:
>female says something
>male tells her that what she said is incorrect and prominently displays a condescending tone
>condescension is motivated by the fact that the male assumes the female is unintelligent or ignorant by virtue of her being female

How mansplaining is most commonly used:
>female says something
>male tells her that what she said is incorrect, using logic and facts to explain why in a manner completely unrelated to the gender of either of them
>female says 'stop mansplaining!' to make it seem like the male is an asshole to distract from the fact that she was wrong

How is it mansplaining when a man disagrees with another man?

>>23535
It's when a cuck argues with a male that likes to assert his position. No amount of reason will convince the cuck that some people are different and they will not completely submit to other people.

Relating to the article:
>Let me just stop you so you don't waste a line of questioning". And then indignation struck on multiple fronts. "I love the mansplaining. I'm enjoying it," Gallagher said, mixing fatigue with just a hint of provocation.

A common thing people do when they disagree with you is to say questions. They will say questions one after another and will not let you answer a question if you get in any words at all. The questions will be unrelated to each other or completely off topic and the people will claim, when you try to answer their question, that you are not letting them speak or talk. They will try to get you to shut up in anyway possible in order to completely dismiss your position or you.

>>23518
Its feminists with nothing to do trying act whiney and bitchy while the mainstream media and some beta males try and cater to their moaning.

It only exists because they want it to. They have to invent shit that "oppresses" them else there would be no need for feminism. All the whole forgetting what real oppression is like.

>>23549
People dismissing others' opinions based on anything other than the content of their opinions?

Smells a lot like liberalism to me.

>>23532
/end thread

>>23518
He was crushing her, I like how she's trying to imply that because a word is common it's not offensive

>>23518
Is that image real

>>23697
Yep. When BWu and the other anti-GGs talk about rampant harassment of women online, this is an example of the horrific misogyny they deal with on a daily basis.

>>23697
Unfortunately.

>>23518
>It's a word that's used
"Shut up, bitch" is also a collection of words that are used. That doesn't mean it would be right more me to say them.

>>23518
>it is a word that's used

lol, what kind of defense is that? Nigger and faggot are also words that are used.

>>23519
>on the verge of finding out.
give them some credit, I think most already know. I don't think we convinced anyone with this:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110216/

>>23532
It's very cringy saying one hates feminists, but mainstream feminism is doing that to girl's heads; their way of arguing is by default assuming the position of the victim. They've made feminism a joke

>mansplain

I hate the memeification of culture. She might have a perfectly legitimate point, but expressing it in dumb, derivative, internet based terminology just takes the point and throws itinto a big puddle of preconcieved notions and baggage.

Say patronising. Its a perfectly legitimate word. I understand the basic idea behind "mansplaining", but the popularisation of it just leadsto some dumb people thinking that men can't express contradictory opinions to women.

>>23734
"mansplaining" seems to be nothing short of a sexist slur. In the video, the woman defines "manplaining" as being condescending or patronizing. Why no just use those two words instead of a gender slur? What is the point of slurs if not to shut down the other side of an argument?

>>23740

I think the idea is that "mansplaining" is supposed to identify a common dynamic that occurs in interactions between women and men, where due to preconcieved notions men talk down to women.

Problem is that there are a lot of people out there incapable of that nuance of thought. On both sides of the equation. People misuse it and misinterpret it and it becomes as good as a slur that just serves as a distraction to bicker over. Not a sensible word to deploy in this situation.

>>23519

>trick the system with DNA

You have no idea what you're talking about.

>>23734
>she

>>23518
but she's a man

>>23734
nobody takes people who use those words seriously anyway

this is what happens when you let these sex tools out of the kitchen

>>23745
Mansplaining along with manspreading and every other man-derivative word feminists cooked up is nothing more than an attempt to popularise shame tactics as single word indefensible attacks in the same way calling men sexist is. In all examples of the "man-" words the "man-" is always an abbreviation for "male who has performed an act a female doesn't approve of". with the follow up word being the act that inciting this attack on the man's pride.
There is no nuance or reason for these words to exist when other words do the same job without being a one sided weapon for women to advance their own gender. At best these are nuisance words used to know what women to avoid, at worst they're a form of censorship and serve as a gateway for more loaded feminist language entering the mainstream.

>>23723
It's not "cringe" at all. I think most people realize that feminists are hypocritical bigots, and there's nothing cringe about hating hypocritical bigots

>>23745
feminists invented that bullshit explanation to cover their asses, same they do with everything. Like when they pretended that #MasculinitySoFragile was actually about *helping* men. Or more generally their "Patriarchy backfiring" BS where they pretend that their whole man-hating movement is about helping men too.
Mansplaining is and always has been a simple tactic for feminists to silence male voices

if a chick says you're "mansplaining" just tell them you identify as a female and that the word "mansplaining" triggered you

>>23863

Not like you've got a chip on your shoulder or anything though.

"I'm not mansplaining, because I don't see you as a woman - you're a fucking dude, dude."

I like how Wu can have a sex change and then play the woman victim card. This is why they are against transracialism. Because I could just say I identify as black and say the most racist shit imaginable, but it is okay for them to pretend to be women and use these victim cards.

>>23532
>What mansplaining should actually mean in theory
That is not how language works familia, if it's most commenly used in a derogatory sense, its meaning is derogatory.
It is the male equivalent to "bitching".

>>24128
Yeah, it's like "Nigger" 50 years ago.
Technically, it just means black person, but it was used as an insult.
Nowadays, though, it's often used in other forms, but is still an occasional insult.

>>23532
That's not what mansplaining is. According to the woman who created it, it wasn't being told she was incorrect, it was a man telling her something she already knew but as if she didn't know it in a condescending tone.
She didnt even know why he did and never confronted the guy over it, but she just assumes it 100% happened because she was a woman.

>>23518
>mansplaining is a word that is used
so is nigger, you dumb bitch.

>>23519
I chuckled

>>23734
>but the popularisation of it just leadsto some dumb people thinking that men can't express contradictory opinions to women
but that's kind of the point.

>Say patronising.
The complaint isn't that he's being patronizing, because that admits the possibility that he still may be correct while being rude.
The charge is that he's male, against which there's no defense. Thus, mansplaining.

>>23518
Woooow I thought they couldn't make something even more mongoloid thant Manspreading.
I'm amazed.