http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/border-agent-we-might-as-well-abolish-our-immigration-laws-altogether/article/2582401
DON'T LET THIS DIE! Get angry! Get everyone you know angry! The vote is being rigged before your very eyes!
>>21189
bumping again
Continuing to not be surprised
Just 1 more year left of this shit, unless Rubio gets in.
>In a shocking reversal of policy
hardly shocking. who would have guessed that the mulatto in chief's parting gift would be a big middle finger to white america?
Nice opinion piece. Not news.
>>>/pol/
>>21222
Nice trips even though is not /b/
>>21256
t. [s4s].
>>21189
>washingtonexaminer.com
>Get angry!
Conservative click bait is made of unnamed sources, speculative outrage, and sensationalism.
>>21258
from the article:
>Testimony of Brandon Judd On behalf of the National Border Patrol Council In front of The House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security
>February 4, 2016
http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/548abd54-b046-4452-a734-0a37a12ec676/judd-testimony-2.4.16.pdf
eat shit
>>21189
WHO CARES. No one is going to do anything significant. We need a revolution now, and every day we wait is another day the door gets closer to being shut forever.
>>21189
I honestly feel like there is some middle ground between open borders and close borders.
>>21266
No you eat shit, it's a sham election year committee put together by partisan house members that has as much relevance as the Benghazi committee. They could have cherry picked any border agent with any opinion but they chose the one that's an outspoken anti-immigration activist and regular Fox News guest.
>>21309
This.
Like that Shrekli hearing where half those old men who were questioning Shrekli are pissed because they're in Big Pharma's pocket and he fucked with their bottom end.
Its political shuck and jive.
>>21309
>They could have cherry picked any border agent with any opinion but they chose the one that's an outspoken anti-immigration activist and regular Fox News guest.
If you have evidence that contradicts his sworn testimony then provide it, otherwise recant.
>>21319
http://fusion.net/story/252637/obama-has-deported-more-immigrants-than-any-other-president-now-hes-running-up-the-score/
>>21321
The Obama administration counts you as deported when they dump you 5 feet from the border.
There's a reason we have been people committing crimes that have been "deported" 5-6 times.
>Taking the government at it's word
>"B-but they said it was true!"
>>21189
You weren't going to pick weeds in the garden anyway. Why do you care?
>>21207
Because marco rubio, who is polling 10-20 points under Donald Trump, is gonna win the republican primary, AND THEN go on to win the election in a majority democrat/liberal country.
>>21189
Who gives a shit, no ones getting hurt because some mexicans want to come to the US to do cheap labor.
>>21322
>The Obama administration counts you as deported when they dump you 5 feet from the border.
Where do you people get this shit?
>>21330
How about from Obama himself?
> "The statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we've been doing is, with the stronger border enforcement, we've been apprehending folks at the borders and sending them back. That is counted as a deportation, even though they may have only been held for a day or 48 hours, sent back -- that's counted as a deportation."
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckj/april-2-2014/he-hasnt-got-anything-la-times-clarifies-obamas-deportation-record-debun
the "deporter in chief" moniker is a myth
>>21328
>no ones getting hurt
no one except the tax payers
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/opinion/educating-illegal-immigrants-is-costly/nQjSw/
>>21334
>the "deporter in chief" moniker is a myth
No, it really isn't.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/265519-deportations-and-the-blood-on-obamas-hands
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Democrats-Obama-immigration-deportation/2015/12/24/id/707046/
>numbersusa
You've got to be kidding.
>NumbersUSA is an immigration reduction organization that seeks to reduce US immigration levels to pre-1965 levels without country of origin quotas as established in the Immigration Act of 1924. It advocates for immigration reduction through user-generated fax, email, and direct mail campaigns. NumbersUSA also seeks to educate the public about the environmental, social, and economic impacts of immigration policy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NumbersUSA
>>21222
How is reporting testimony of a Congressional hearing an opinion piece?
>>21383
Because the point of the cherrypicked testimony is to misportray the government as "not even pretending to enforce the border" when in reality Obama has deported more than 1.5x as many people as any other president.
>>21189
Why are you angry? Or surprised? Immigration is beneficial to the upper class and upper middle class, and they are the ones who vote and make campaign contributions.
>>21327
>majority democrat/liberal country
Haha no
>>21193
>>21197
This is a low traffic board, stop bumping.
>>21322
>The Obama administration counts you as deported when they dump you 5 feet from the border.
What do you want him to do? Break the guy's legs and dump him in Guadalajara? There are rules, anon, and if you want them to be respected, you have to respect them.
>>21340
>NumbersUSA
What is your point? Is that supposed to impugn their status as a reputable organization? It's irrelevant regardless because the source of the quote is the president.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/28/remarks-president-open-questions-roundtable
>>21421
>Because the point of the cherrypicked testimony is to misportray the government
That would be perjury before congress.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1621
>when in reality Obama has deported more than 1.5x as many people as any other president.
According to whom? I'll take the president at his word when he claims "the statistics are deceptive".
>>21478
It isn't that NumbersUSA isn't 'reputable' (whatever that means in this context, I'm sure they are BBB approved). It's that they are an anti-immigration thinktank pretending to be a news service.
>That would be perjury before congress.
Not if the Congressman who called the hearing in the first place did so expressly to spread the false and misleading idea around the press.
>According to whom? I'll take the president at his word when he claims "the statistics are deceptive".
According to reality outside of the conservative circlejerk bubbleworld where tens of thousands of brownskins are pouring over the border every
day and being welcomed by Obama with fruit baskets and free welfare checks.
As has already been quoted:
>http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/265519-deportations-and-the-blood-on-obamas-hands
>http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Democrats-Obama-immigration-deportation/2015/12/24/id/707046/
And then from just yesterday:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/4/obama-reinstates-catch-and-release-policy-illegals/
The North American Union will happen, better welcome it now if you don't want to get picked up by the trumpstapo.
>>21517
The Alex Jones types have been saying that for 30 years now. No Ameros are being exchanged for dollars yet.
Is it a felony make it one three strikes your out
>>21526
Nobody wants to pay to incarcerate that many non-citizens in American jails.
That's also why Kate's Law will never pass at the federal level no matter how much Bill O'Reilly lobbies for it.
>>21522
This anon has a point. Too much opinion regarding immigration seems to try to immediately sway you into outrage, while giving almost 0 facts. Its the typical scheme of the Alex Jones types, phrase something in the worst possible terms, make a plea to emotion, then switch to an ad for overpriced 'Merican' water filters if any real questions come up.
I'm so jaded with these Boys crying Wolf that if there were a real insiduous issue regarding immigration I would be deaf to it thanks to all the hysteria.
>>21340
When Newsmax has the side of "Deporter in Chief"...well.
That's a pretty strong conservative news aggregator.
>>21522
You're right, it hasn't happened yet, therefore it never will.
>>21561
12 million+ illegals is larger than some small countries and a strain on infrastructure. In a welfare state system, extending economic benefits to a typically poor migrant class is a crisis of policy in of itself. I guess you have to wait until the cartels start driving nuclear bombs across the border and Austin is smoldering ruins for you to recognize these things develop over time.
It has long been a crisis, you suffer from normalcy bias.
>>21701
This is so stupid.
Fear mongering never works.
>>21497
>Not if the Congressman who called the hearing in the first place did so expressly to spread the false and misleading idea around the press.
Great, more conjecture.
>>http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/265519-deportations-and-the-blood-on-obamas-hands
>By Kica Matos, contributor
https://twitter.com/kicamatos
>Director of Immigrant Rights & Racial Justice, @CommunityChange.
So, some two-bit SJW is a more authoritative source on border patrol's immigrant detainment policy than an actual employee of said institution.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-plans-raids-to-deport-families-who-surged-across-border/2015/12/23/034fc954-a9bd-11e5-8058-480b572b4aae_story.html
> More than 100,000 families with both adults and children have made the journey across the southwest border since last year, though this migration has largely been overshadowed by a related surge of unaccompanied minors.
>The ICE operation would target only adults and children who have already been ordered removed from the United States by an immigration judge, according to officials familiar with the undertaking, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because planning is ongoing and the operation has not been given final approval by DHS. The adults and children would be detained wherever they can be found and immediately deported. The number targeted is expected to be in the hundreds and possibly greater.
So, a few hundred deported out of 100,000 arrivals = "deporter in chief"
