http://gizmodo.com/las-gas-leak-disaster-is-a-bigger-problem-than-you-real-1750035270
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/12071857/Infrared-camera-reveals-huge-methane-gas-leak-wreaking-havoc-in-Los-Angeles.html
>>12699
related
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/220073-why-we-cant-plug-southern-californias-massive-methane-leak
>>12699
Los Angeles was only metaphorically a fart before this happened.
Does this mean the 1960s smog is coming back?
what would happend if that was lit on fire would it burn off the excess pressure in a cleaner manor?
>>13007
Apparently it's not consistent enough to light up. I was reading the other day they're avoiding that because the way it comes out could cause a huge explosion if set on fire.
>>13012
More or less, yeah. And those gases would be less potent than methane. But the problem is finding a good way to light it.
>>13018
Seems simple, just take a junk car, douse it i gasoline, point it the right way, set the cruise control, light it up and send it off.
hey, this is important news and relevant to my interests
>>13267
Are you lying?
Three to four months to close the leak, the company says. I know they don't care about the environment, so how much money are they losing every day it goes unstoppered?
Somebody light a match already, the suspense is ...boring.
>tfw I went up there but wasnt allowed to take pictures
>>16271
How did they know you were trying?
>>16278
I was just told not to take pictures when i got there
>>16303
Lol, they're trying to downplay this whole thing. Which means it's probably worse than predictions.
>>16348
It is a lot worse than it seems because when i was up there, there was a lot of activity going on