Why does "deep" or "sad" music get highly regarded but "light" or "fun" music gets not as highly regarded when it can be just as good if not better
Is it cause emo fags
the fuck are you on about nigger?
>>66457830
I just said stupid retard. Look at the top of rym
its all sad depressing shit and moody meme shit
Wheres the fun shit
>depressing music doesn't make you feel good
Btfo
>>66457845
>caring about arbitrary RYM ratings
>>66457899
Never did I ever say I cared. It's just proving my point of question.
Fun stuff tends to be accessible which /mu/ doesn't like.
>>66457845
>Look at the top of rym
eat shit
>>66457970
Look at the top of any music reviewing site, rym, or here. All the same albums, who cares. Answer my question
>>66457800
Deep =/= sad
Also top 40 is mostly the "light" or "fun" you describe.
However, you make somewhat of a point. My favorite stuff, though, has little emotion at all
>>66458048
>My favorite stuff, though, has little emotion at all
how
>>66458048
Well, it is a question. I'm not really making a point, rather a question. I guess people get their emotions out to music too?
I think my favorite albums tend to be a mixbag of fun and sad though, I guess. Like Age of Adz or a Can album.
>>66458072
It's more experimentation, complexity and/or sound design. My favorites are mid-career Autechre and Ambient
>>66457988
fun music is generally vapid, it doesn't stick; the top 40 is an endless line of songs passing through a rotating door which stand in the spotlight for some time and then vanish into the ether, one catchy hook will get replaced by another.
