If it wasn't by Iggy Pop and David Bowie it would be.
Can someone post the OP - The Idiot picture?
because you didn't check these dubs
>>66454113
Embarrassing
>>66454104
And here I thought Iggy and Bowie were /mu/-approved.
Not like it matters. Just saying.
>>66454347
they are, one guy doesn't represent the board
because it's good
>>66454104
>>66454347
They're liked by /mu/, but they're not obscure enough to be /mu/core
>>66455373
The Beach Boys aren't obscure, yet Pet Sounds is on every /mu/core chart
>>66455373
I haven't seen what the /mu/core chart looks like in like 4 years but i mean
loveless, mbdtf, merriweather, aeroplane, kid a, and itcotck are hardly obscure
>>66455373
I really don't think being obscure is a qualification.
>Beach Boys
>Kanye West
>Radiohead
>>66455433
>>66455469
>>66455505
I suppose you're right.
I was thinking of stuff like Neutral Milk Hotel or American Football which we at least believe to be obscure, but I suppose there is a lot of well know /mu/core.
>>66455373
indie and mainstream appeal is what defines mu-core ya dolt
this album isn't /mu/-core because it isn't representative or the kinds of albums championed by /mu/. It can really only be compared to other albums by David Bowie and Brian Eno, whereas /mu/core albums are defined by their influence and direct relations to other music on the board
also in my opinion, this record is just not interesting. It repetitive in an uninteresting way and overall a dull listen. But then, I've never been a fan of the production of David Bowie, so my opinion's probably irrelevant
>>66455373
are you retarded
