Are you friends with people who listen to Type 0 unironically?
>>66394909
>this thread again
>>66394909
The fuck with all these tiers and genres ive never heard of. TIL im type I
>>66394909
Considering pretty much everyone has heard film music and singer/songwriter, yes.
I mean "singer/songwriter" covers a wide variety of genres. The tiers dont actually mean anything, hampus himself has no reasoning for them.
>>66394998
Hearing and actively listening are entirely different
Obviously the "Hip Hop" that you have to endure when you take a shortcut through the Commoner's ghetto doesn't count
why is turntable music in type iii?? that's not the same level patrician as avant garde jazz
>>66395055
Turntable Music =/= Turntablism
For Turntable Music see John Cage's 1939 work "Imaginary Landscape"
>>66395082
Or eriKm, Christian Marclay, Philip Jeck, Kid Koala, Martin Tetreault, Otomo Yoshihide
>>66395098
>Kid Koala
Turntablism, not Turntable Music
>>66394998
>no reasoning for them.
Its actually designed for exploration, think of each tier as stepping stones away from the normies at the bottom.
>>66394909
I'm not friends with anyone that cares enough about what other people listen to because i'm not friends with autistismos
>>66395108
Hes done both, and more.
>>66395111
There's still no solid musicological reason for having any of these "genres" where they are. Some are purely tecniques, some are subests of other aesthetics. Spectralism for example is a subset of sonorism, its much more complex and advanced, but yet is a tier below.
Sonorism simply means using any sound to make music. Spectralism takes that idea to the next level.
>>66395143
>takes that idea to the next level.
So they are different then.
>>66394909
>not listening to all types
Pleb as fuck
>>66395150
they are different, but yet spectralism is below sonorism? Nothing on the chart really makes sense. Like I said, no solid musicological reasoning behind it.
>people not realizing this is a thinly veiled /pol/ thread
>>66395163
>but yet spectralism is below sonorism
Well that you'd have to ask Hampy about.
>>66395172
>trying to derail a thread into /pol/ shitposting
Why did you come back back Hamtrax? You've always been an annoying pleb spic.
>>66395183
DUES VULT LE JEWS XD
>>66395175
nah no need. Chart is discarded on premise alone, let alone execution and reasoning
>>66395172
It's not /pol/'s fault that people at the unfortunate end of the IQ bell curve prefer Hip Hop and Rawk
>>66394909
>deep house above math rock
suicide.exe
>>66395287
>muh geetah muzak
