how is vaporwave legal? shouldn't all the use sampling violate creator's rights? some tracks are pretty much remixes
>>66385767
>i dont know what copyright means: the post
>>66385767
how is hip hop legal? shouldn't all the use sampling violate creator's rights? some tracks are pretty much remixes
>>66385791
the owners of diana ross's music could easily sue vektroid for sample use
>>66385767
>some tracks are pretty much remixes
are you implying that remixes are illegal?
you clearly dont know a lot about copyright laws, maybe look it up before posting
>>66385887
If you don't get permission to remix someone and you sell it, it's illegal and they can sue you for the money you made using their property. Not sure about free-release remixes since I don't know if there's precedent for anyone suing over it.
Vaporwave can easily be covered by the whole 'parody.' When vaporwave first pushed off a lot of artists kept chanting that this is a parody of capitlistic future.
No music company has attempted to go after this since it will only result in a good lawyer just hiding behind parody, and causing every vaporwave artist to do the same.
The only time a big artist got legally threatened was Saint Pepsi, and that was from Pepsi Co, for obvious reasons. He didn't mind too much since he was already transforming into the faggot he is today.
Can someone pls do a Simpsonwave remix that combines the Gracie Films logo with King of wishful thinking? They sound like they're made for each other.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4iwzS4Na0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO7sqsqJAPg
>>66386054
This is just false. Fair use is a thing for a reason
>>66385864
Lmao is she a slave or something why does someone own her.
>>66386441
genius
aesthetic king
>>66385767
copyright is a fascist concept that shouldn't exist
it's only a thing because of greed and corporations
>>66386441
>simpsonwave
kill yourself faggot that's not a thing
>>66387468
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpsonwave
>>66385767
>creators rights
>>66386441
look in the description of the second video
>>66388536
>>66387468
Oh are we playing the "post something from Wikipedia that literally nobody will ever care about" game?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Brazilian_presidential_election,_2010
