ITT last 5 albums rated on rym
>>66311647
>albums
>>66311719
>>66311693
Interested what an artist named Tom and Jerry sounds like though.
>>66311798
Its an alias of 4hero, rave era breakbeat hardcore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm-9dLq6Szs
>>66311647
Why the low Untrue score
>>66311719
Oh Rotatey
>>66311779
Decent Getz/Gilberto score.
>>66311798
Fun fact: Tom and Jerry also used to be the name of Simon and Garfunkel.
>>66311837
>Fields of Rape
Interesting name
>>66311647
Burial BTFO
>>66311719
>blipblop music
it's okay. noone will know wtf you listen to, but aight
>>66311858
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp7n4bcInP4
>>66311895
Huh ok. I really should listen to Nada sometime.
Uhh
>>66312629
I kind of agree with the Loveless rating, but do you like any other shoegaze? just curious.
>>66311647
>sigur ros
fucking kill yourself
>>66312665
Not really; open to suggestions, though.
>>66312563
Pretentious twat
This thread isn't that bad, but I'm always surprised seeing how low people rate albums on these. Like, do you think you're impressive because you have only two 5 star albums on your meaningless chart?
>>66313030
Yes, wouldn't it be great if we all rated all music 5 stars, what a fascinating world that would be if we all liked the same things and called it all amazing, that would be fun, huh
>>66313030
My ratings could be considered low as I try to distinguish how I feel about an album as clearly as possible using the RYM scale. You only have ten levels to work with, so a pitchfork 8.5/10 might be a RYM 3.5/5 to fit the RYM system. Most of us only listen to music we really like, so having your 1/5 represent a regular 5/10 wouldn't be too dumb.
>>66313072
That's obviously not what I mean. I'm talking about people that purposefully go to 5 very different, critically acclaimed albums and give them all <4 stars.
Thanks for the condescension, tho bb
>',: )
>>66313030
Maybe because the absolute rating doesn't actually matter, the only 'important' thing is the order they're ranked in.
Five stars will mean different things to different people, and if it makes sense for people to only assign that rating to their absolute creme de la creme, then let them be.
>>66313132
My pleasure.
I have 1 star ratings for critically acclaimed albums /mu/ creams over and would say I did it on purpose but then also have 5 star ratings for critically acclaimed albums /mu/ ignores.
Some call in contrarian, I call it different tastes.
>>66312629
Wanna share your css?
>>66313219
Not mine.
https://userstyles.org/styles/127897/rateyourmusic-tomorrow
>>66312563
Jap shit, and ''look how obscure my taste is hahah guys is anyone looking?''
>>66312629
>>66312665
loveless 2.0
why? :(
>>66312907
do you like songs ohia
>>66312563
have you heard jowalls solo stuff
went through some tmv albums
>>66313246
Thx.
>>66313030
the only i have rated as 5/5 is f#a# because its the only album i come back to and still enjoy as much as i did hte first time when i listened to it 5 years ago.
i've started with a lot of 5/5's then went down as i just got burnt out on. i don't use music as a status symbol.
>>66313299
not really, any rec?
>>66312907
All great albums my dude
>>66313275
Didn't really do much for me. The sort of overall fuzzy sound it has is kind of cool, but other than that, eh.
>>66313384
>3 stars for glorious meditatios
>4.5 for shitty souvlaki
Get out of here.
>>66313447
>taste differs
>>66313474
Your taste is objectively shitty. As I said, get out of here.
>>66313447
Well, guess i'll change it to fit your tastes.
>>66313568
Good. I need a little bitch to obey me.
>>66313384
how did you get the dark rym theme?
>>66313633
underage b8
>>66313675
https://userstyles.org/styles/127897/rateyourmusic-tomorrow
>>66313604
>jazzcuck calling anyone a bitch
lmaoing my ass off here
>>66313759
can i get this on chrome?
>>66313828
yeah just install stylish
>>66313825
In the world of music, Jazz listeners are S while Shoegaze listeners are obviously M.
>>66313492
jazz is for faggots
>>66313633
I gave that Pulp album the same rating as you. It's kinda enjoyable for the duration of the listen, but I never feel the urge to return to it.
>>66312907
I've seriously been meaning to check out The Microphones.
>>66312629
I strongly disagree with your Loveless rating, but I understand that tastes differ.
>>66311877
Faust IV is great.
>>66314440
yeah i totally agree with you about that Pup album, dont really wanna listen to it again for a while
lads
https://rateyourmusic.com/~hamtrax
>>66313030
>Like, do you think you're impressive because you have only two 5 star albums on your meaningless chart?
Not impressive, accurate. I don't think many things are perfect, so I don't feel the need to lie to avoid looking like pretentious.
>>66313300
i really like noctourniquet and i think is at the same level of octahedron
is just want to know, why you didn't like it?
>>66313030
not trying to impress anybody, i just give 5 stars to albums which i love all the tracks, so far that only happened 3 times.
