If this isn't your AOTY then you know nothing about music.
>>66263244
if this is your AOTY you are a drone, and have not explored 2016 releases in any major way
>>66263282
This.
That electroswing album is not that bad, but it deserve a mediocre 7 to be nice.
>>66263244
RE: Guys, does anyone have a link to the high quality WAV of this album? Thanks, I love you.
>>66263381
>high quality
>WAV
pick one
>>66263317
>he watched anthony fantano's review
>it is now his exact opinion
>>66263394
You know like 2822 kbps
>>66263317
a 7 isn't mediocre.
a 5 is mediocre.
>>66263434
This is what happens when 14yrolds used to shitposting on /v/ try to apply that shit to /mu/.
A MOTEL MASTERPIECE
>>66263381
I have received the CD and have ripped it in lossless with a log but since you're uneducated about audio compression technology I won't upload it.
link a download
>>66263434
1- awful
2- very bad
3- bad
4- Mediocre
5- ok
6- good
7- great
8- awesome
9- fantastic
10- masterpiece
>>66263773
What the fuck are you talking about? WAV could be be high quality.
>>66263851
1- awful
2- very bad
3- bad
4- offputting
5- mediocre
6- decent
7- good
8- great
9- fantastic
10- masterpiece
If this is your AOTY then you know nothing about music.
>>66263860
WAV is lossless but it's not compressed, and if you actually think audio quality is solely determined by the kbps then no need to say any more senpai
>>66264024
Interesting. Why is compression necessary?
I listened to it twice and don't really have a desire to listen to it any more.
I never imagined that would be the case.
>>66263851
>awesome
>fantastic
Holy shit mate why don't you do us all a favor and become a music critic
>>66264099
To save space why else. There is no loss in quality, there is no need to have a 1.4 gig WAV when it can be a 450 MB FLAC.
>>66264024
I am talking about a high quality rip or some kind of HQ copy of the album, which could be 2822 kbps WAV. Am I missing something here?
A good effort, but not as good as The Why's Alopecia!
>>66264024
Oh I see what you are saying, you don't want to upload it unless it is smaller and compressed.
>>66264024
Well who said I wanted it in compressed format though?
Someone hit me up with a mega link.
this. a better album has not been released.
>>66264477
Not all compression reduces the sound quality.
Compression can be divided into two categories: Lossless compression and Lossy compression.
Lossless compression makes the filesize smaller in a process where no information is lost (which means the sound quality stays the same).
Lossless compression reversible, you are not losing information but only representing it in a way that takes less space.
Lossy compression can reduce the filesize even more by discarding information (preferably in places that aren't obvious like removing all the low bass tones you can't hear anyway on your $5 earbuds). This isn't reversible because you can't get back the information you discarded
Lossless:
> Recording of 100% of musical information with a size of 100mb
> { lossless compression process }
> Recording of 100% of musical information with a size of 80mb
Lossy:
> Recording of 100% of musical information with a size of 100mb
> { lossy compression process }
> Recording of 80% of musical information with a size of 50mb
In your case you can have a 2822kbps WAV file of 1.4GB or a 2822kbps FLAC file of 450MB
The amount of information (2822kbps) stays the same while the filesize differs.
It's both the same information only one file stores it less efficiently.
>>66263282
whats your aoty wise guy
>>66264293
>>66264772
Okay I was having a laf but here's the link https://mega.nz/#!0RAyWAiR!yMKJm0DjxDnAaRponQVjurmt4juvr99NVrpkbIBN6EM
Wildflower in FLAC for the archive
Good luck to all the people discussing WAV if they ever attempt the what.cd interview.
>>66263244
neither do you
sage
this album is AHHHHH-ful
>>66266676
ANOHNI - HOPELESSNESS
>>66263282
Can you explain this reasoning without ad hominem?
>>66263244
I literally can't comprehend a record topping it this year. I really didn't think they could outdo themselves, but they did it. Shit's perfect.
Not even in, like, the top 30.
>>66263434
Mediocre depends on the overall average score you doofus.
>>66263244
>I'm a connoisseur, i've conned you sir.
>>66268911
>ANOHNI - HOPELESSNESS
give your top 10?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHOotqmRK5U
If this isn't your AOTY then you know nothing about music.
