who are some artists that p4k consistently lowballs?
>bonus for no tool, nine inch nails, or mars volta
Of montreal
MGMT
>>66226435
This
Autechre. That's to be expected though.
>>66226573
this release was so good and def deserved a higher score, but p4k have it out for them I swear
plus imo it was dumb how they reviewed each one separately
Neo pitchfork hates AnCo
>>66226784
Not really, though PW deserved a 7 in retrospect.
any white artist
Health which is weird because they like to report on them and have them at their festivals.
Dr. Dog
Yung lean
The orb
>>66227297
honestly, any electronic/dance act that isn't super trendy or has crossover appeal gets panned or at least gets a < 8 score. they've gotten a little better in recent years, but yeesh....
>>66226901
Too drunk to find an example but I've noticed the numerical value often doesn't correspond well to the content of the review.
>>66227865
>Review itself makes note of all the good things about the album
>5.5
>mfw
>>66227892
They used to do the opposite with Jason Molina, esp the later stuff. Scores would be okay but the commentary itself would often be snide and patronizing as fuck. Guess he wasn't making the music P4K wanted to hear. Gee sorry fellers.
