>>66145425
he isnt afraid of telling the truth about. so plebs get mad because he said beatles wasnt innovative and radiohead is overrated faux experimental shit (which is both true)

>>66145553
this

>>66145553
Saying the Beatles weren't innovative is objectively wrong though. They were pioneering pretty revolutionary studio techniques. Whether they were good or not is a matter of opinion, but you have to be pretty uneducated musically to not recognize how important they were.

>>66145674
>They were pioneering pretty revolutionary studio techniques

Have you ever heard about Frank Zappa?

>>66145902
that guys a fagget

>>66145674
Don't start this fight man. Just don't. The only thing that will result from an argument with a scaruffidrone about the beatles is high blood pressure.

>>66146191
Kek delusional Beatles fanboy

>>66145553
objectively wrong

he is pretentious. and I don't just say that like people say GY!BE is pretentious or some shit just because they don't get it. Scaruffi actually fits the very definition of the word. plus he's contrarian for the sake of asserting his apparent intelligence.

>>66145425
plebs don't actually read his reviews, they go to his website to look at how much their favourite normie album has out of 10

>>66145902
Are you saying only one artist can be innovative at a time?

>>66147544
This really.
The man is insufferably pretentious I don't see how people genuinely take him seriously. He actually makes Christgau seem pleasant.

>>66147639
pretty much, whenever I actually read something he's written I always go, "and THIS is the guy who /mu/ is always going on about?"

>>66147781
Most of my commentary on his reviews is "how do you know that?", "that doesn't sound true at all", and "okay, sources faggot".

>>66147889
he's the Stefan Molyneux of music reviews