Was it because of the """""""""""""rape"""""""""""""?
because it was basically just their last two albums but worse
no the rape was because of the pan
/mu/ is the only place online people still talk about that
No, it just wasn't all that great.
>Larkin is a wild-ass Georgia mountain woman, or She-Shaman, or something. Ha ha!
- Michael Gira
What did he mean by this?
it's accurate
>>66118192
"no"
the seer and to be kind were better though
>>66118194
>he actually said this
nice
"panned"? It got the same rating as Filth
>>66118194
Young God was basically a competition between Michael and his contracted artists to see who could resemble a hippie burnout caricature the most.
>>66118141
who even cares what pitchfork rated it
>>66118156
Panning is literally rape
>8.1
>"panned"
>filth got an 8.1
>"not panned"
wtf are you on about
>>66118372 is correct
are you on fucking meth?
a) this is one of their worst songs
b) on one of their worst albums
c) and they suck as a band in general
i genuinely think p4k would['ve rated lower than the other 2
but i think it would've gotten a 8.5-8.8 or something with a BNM if it weren't for the allegations