The correct answer is no.
most of her discography is 8's and 9's, so he's not remotely correct.
>>66097150
>vespertine not the best
Yeah he's wrong
>>66097175
He thinks Debut is better than Post, Vespertine, Medilla, Biophilia, and is equal to Homogenic.
>>66097150
>This kills the Bjorkfags
He gave a Korn album higher than every Bjork album.
So yes.
>>66097349
As it should. This old cook doesn't know what's good
>>66097235
>He thinks Debut is better than Post,
this is true, though.
>>66097459
he's more right than others
still, it's obviously homogenic > vespertine > debut > post > everything else
>>66097235
Try reading the review
>>66097614
This is what he said about Vespertine
>The first impression with Bjork's music is always of something terribly trivial, obnoxious and, ultimately, boring. Vespertine (Elektra, 2001) is no exception. The "modern" rhythms are a masquerade. The tenuous arrangements are hardly innovative. Bjork is a plastic fantastic vocalist, who can turn pretty much any sequence of notes into a song and add a magical, oneiric feeling to whatever plays around her, but Hidden Place is merely easy listening with echoes of 1960s' film music in the ethereal choir.
The bubbling, sparkling, delicate tapestry of It's Not up To You (a veritable jungle of sound effects) eventually releases a string-driven aria that belongs to Broadway shows. The coda, again, brings in the female choir, a recurring trick throughout the album (oddly reminiscent of the Rolling Stones' You Can't Always Get What You Want). A similar pattern occurs in An Echo A Stain.
The subdued, disjointed, timidly noisy electronics (courtesy of Matmos) perfectly complement Bjork's wandering and overdubbed vocals in Undo, ranking as the second most important trick of the album, soon joined by the ever more cosmic choir. By the fifth track you are beginning to sense that there is very little of substance, just those two tricks and Bjork's voice. Bjork's quasi-operatic talent does shine in Aurora, that sounds like the soundtrack to a happily lost Alice In Wonderland. A childish atmosphere populates the closing Unison as well.
Too mellow to display any significant emotion, the album lives of romantic and surreal soundscapes, broadly reminiscent of film and show tunes.
>>66098238
(Cont) She is not a genius of composition, but her paradisiac, fairy-queen crooning has indeed created something new the way Hendrix's guitar invented something new. She doesn't own the arrangements, and often seems indifferent to them (Heirloom is simply Bjork's vocals on top of Console's instrumental Crabcraft), but the album's complexity is the ideal setting for her art, whatever her art is.
Just like the Beatles before her, Bjork has made trivial pop music enhanced with studio wizardry. It's the studio wizardry, not the music, that people buy. And the tv-friendly image, of course. Anybody who thinks Bjork is a genius should try to listen at least to Solex. Let your ears, not publicity, judge.
Family Tree (Elektra, 2002) is a six-CD box-set that collects rare and previously unreleased material. Greatest Hits (Elektra, 2002) is a career retrospective.
>>66097150
Bjork does fucking suck
Inb4 waifu fags cry
He right
Bork a shit
What the fuck is even with all this Rating shit? Who cares? Is this the official Autism board?
The correct answer is yes.
Bunch of acoustic niggers....
>>66097150
He clearly dislikes Bjork.
Relative...Debut overrated Vespertine underrated.
Here is my opinion btw:
Debut 6.5/10
Post 7/10
Telegram 7.5/10
Homogenic 8/10
Selmasongs 6/10
Vespertine 8/10
Medulla 8/10
Drawing restraint ???/10
Volta 5.5/10
Biophilia 6.5/10
>2016
>listening to plebruffi
>>66098817
What about Vulnicura?
>>66098838
Oh yes.
Vulnicura 7.5/10
All overinflated desu
Why is there so much scaruffi shit lately? Who cares?
quints
>>66098255
Why does he bring The Beatles into everything
It's like he's bragging that he doesn't like them
>>66099998
quints maybe?
>>66100039
epic fail.
>>66097150
his ratings are incredibly accurate as usual
i've yet to see someone on this board actually explain how scaruffi is wrong about anything
they can only meme and i respect that
>>66097150
>Medulla is 6.5
>>66100167
it's not a standard rating system
don't let not knowing anything stop you from getting pissed off though
>>66100134
>Debut better than Post
I'd actually just accept him rating Debut as lower. Also, the fact that he ranks Medulla as being 1.5 Scaruffi points higher than Biophilia, as it means he just doesn't seem to value electronic elements in pop.
