ITT: bands that started strong and then got bad for a while and then got good again
Swans obv
>>66094537
the mars volta
>>66094547
Are you dissing Angels of Light?
Because I think this shithead's dissing Angels of Light.
>>66094607
More like Angels of Shite
>>66094607
no, i think he might dissing the 90's folk rock era
>>66094537
weezer
>>66094642
still waiting for them to get good again and also be good at the beginning
blink-182
>>66094667
oh SHIT
King Crimson
>>66094800
I'll bite. When was their bad phase?
korn
GY!BE
Johnny Cash
Rancid
>>66094537
Weezer
nofx
Red Hot Chili Peppers, the new album was pretty good
>>66094642
/thread
>>66094915
I wouldn't say bad, but Poseidon/Lizard/Islands sounds uninspired compared to their other works
>>66094703
they're like the opposite man. they started off bad (cheshire cat, dude ranch, buddha) got good (enema of the state, take off your pants and jacket, self titled), and are now at their worst (neighbourhoods, california)
>>66094937
when were korn ever good
>>66095083
>I wouldn't say bad, but Poseidon/Lizard/Islands sounds uninspired compared to their other works
H-HOW DARE YOU, THAT'S... completely agreeable.
For some reason I didn't realize that was a possibility.
>>66094537
Bob Dylan
David Bowie
Deftones
Pink Floyd
>>66095228
David Bowie, definitely
>>66095126
when scaruffi said so.
Daft Punk
RAM is their best album
>>66095228
Pink Floyd never got out of their bad state.
>>66095343
not their second one.
>>66094537
weezer
>>66094537
The Flaming Lips
>>66095343
"I MUST ALWAYS GO AGAINST THE POPULAR OPINION" Jesus Christ you people get annoying. Pink Floyd has always been good, just because they got famous doesnt mean they went bad, doesnt happen to good bands like them.
>>66095104
>Dude Ranch
>bad
fuck off
>>66095280
disagree
it's their most polished, but certainly not their best
I think Discovery is their best, but I would entertain an argument for Homework
Human After All is the only mediocre daft punk album
>>66095383
Why you so butthurt?
You immediately jump to the conclusion that the dude is being contrary simply to be contrary.
I agree with him.
I like their material with Syd best and I don't really care for their post Waters stuff.
>>66095524
Same, I don't know how that being a contrarian. I'm pretty sure most agree that post-Waters material was poorer. I think OP thought that they meant Pink Floyd was always bad, not Pink Floyd was in a bad state and never got out of it. Probably a confusion.
Your mom
Smashing Pumpkins
>>66095839
kek
>implying she gets better after becoming a mom
>>66095228
>Deftones
Gore is literally the only bad thing they've done, and it's not even bad. It's just subpar
>>66095228
Pink Floyd literally died in a long, protracted series of farts.
