haven't been on here for a while, has this been leaked yet?

>>66084630
It's been released

>>66084630
Yup. It's being discussed all over /mu/, I'm pretty sure you can find a link somewhere.

>>66084630
Yes.

>>66084647
google says it comes out on the 8th. any good? or is it as bad as the first single makes it out to be?

>>66084673
Totally garbage..

>>66084673
Don't listen to these contrarian faggots. It's a really good follow up.

>>66084718
i'll listen to it, but i'm sure >>66084707 is right.
every release i've heard this year: swans, radiohead, anco have been hugely disappointing

>>66084673
i like it so far. and i'm also giving it time to grow; i thought sily was boring when i first heard it

>>66084673
Almost as good as SILY

>>66084673
>google says it comes out on the 8th.
You can listen to it on Apple Music rn.

>any good?
Couldn't give you a rigid opinion, but I like it. Not as good as SILY.

>or is it as bad as the first single makes it out to be?
There's one other song there that's as goofy and polarizing, but it's mostly a mix of psych, hip-hop and some nu-disco.

>>66084808
>there's one other song...
fuck da, messy eater is a jam. reminds me of prince among thieves

>>66084997
I like it, but I was just reporting general opinions based on the threads here.

>>66084756
same for me, anco had like 2 good tracks, radiohead felt bland, and swans weren't able to top to be kind and/or the seer.

I might give sily another shot if this is shit.

>>66084997
or noisey eater, whatever. still a jam.
cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skuJKTC4_oQ

>>66084780
it's good, but after listening to the first few tracks i doubt it.
it might be as good as some of their weaker mixes but it's nowhere near SILY, GIMIX, or some people.
>>66085038
what were the two anco tracks?