Post your RYM breakdown by decade
This is viewable under the link "User Stats" on your RYM profile, or here:
https://rateyourmusic.com/stats/userstats?user=anon
if you replace anon with your username
>>66071385
>>66071455
not too positive eh, lads?
>>66071385
I agree fuck the 80's
>>66071455
I agree fuck Boku no Tripfag !!uo+rI9nd/lP
>>66071494
I agree engage in sexual intercourse with Acre2000 !!HdX6HJTMWn8
>>66071385
do you even like music?
>>66071493
it's all relative
>>66071494
>>66071511
oh em oh
>>66071493
>having an average of like 3.8
absolutely disgusting. You shove everything that you like into 3 meager spots - 5.0, 4.5, and 4.0, and yet everything you don't like gets to spread out into 6 spacious slots of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0.
Who cares about the difference between something you dislike a little and something you dislike a medium amount. You only get 10 rating slots, use those to differentiate between the records you spend time with, the ones you like, the ones that affect you. Let them have some breathing room, let your 5s have space to really stand out and be special.
old music is hard
>>66071566
sorry replied to the wrong person.
meant for >>66071533
>>66071547
oh boy here we go
>>66071533
we all do
>>66071511
lmao classic Mark And !JEZcL9RRk.
>>66071538
I've gotta ask, where is that reaction image even from
>>66071547
Relax
Don't do it
When you wanna to go to it
Relax
Don't do it
When you wanna come
Relax
Don't do it
When you wanna suck to it
When you wanna come
ayyy this is worse (or better) than I expected
>>66071521
>nothing from the 60s
AYY LMAO
Y
Y
L
M
A
O
>>66071608
it's a panel from 81 Diver, a manga about shogi
>>66071616
I'm not actively avoiding stuff from the 60's. What do you suggest?
>>66071593
get off my lawn
>>66071596
lmao classic post-swampist !p.oliTrips
>>66071618
what's that one 1900s record you gave a 4.5
>>66071640
Japanese chess? Well that's interesting.
>>66071618
>entire rating system is averaged at over 4
who cares
>>66071655
>get off my lawn
>70% albums from the 2000s
I've just only listened to classic albums from old periods anon
>>66071657
I only really listen to things that I think I'll enjoy and more often then not I'm right.
What can I say.
>>66071655
Maple leaf rag
Vess Osman
>>66071684
I'm only joking but what are you trying to say
>>66071694
Interesting
>>66071694
>what can I say
take more risks, you'll find great stuff that way
>>66071647
You really have hardly anything from before the 2000s. What are your favorite bands? Why not try and find out some of their influences, and listen to albums from them? You can post them here and someone might help you, or try and trawl their wikipedia pages.
Without knowing what kind of music you like, the best I can do is to suggest just going through the top of the RYM charts for each decade, that's sure to give you plenty of great music that is part of the canon.
>>66071771
I do occasionally.
Not often enough though.
Found a 90's funk album that I adore now that way.
Had no others rates on RYM till I rated it.
That being said if something doesn't at least slightly interest me upon starting it I usually wont finish it, and thus wont rate it.
I care more about recording what I did like then what I don't, know what I mean?
>>66071724
When I rated it I was rating it in relation to the time period in which it was released.
However I just started going back through my rates and doing them all on personal enjoyment purely.
I might move it down to a 3 or 3.5 accordingly.
let's try to make this thread less useless
post stuff you rated from 1956
>>66071836
fuck off you filthy tripcode user
>>66071836
I have nothing from that year :(
>>66071830
Wew that's quite the score move but cool.
>>66071836
What's Schwartz like
>>66071836
what are some good entry level 60s/70s albums
>>66071880
Art Blakey & The Jazz Messengers - Free for All
>>66071880
Half of "good, entry level albums" in general are from the 60's and 70's. Check out the sticky or RYM's overall top albums.
>>66071836
sure
>>66071919
>>66071923
thanks guys
let's do 62 now
>>66071876
oh yeah, the erectus album... I'll listen to that one, eventually
>>66071874
he was an amateur recorder
sounds of my city is his 'vision' of a common day in NYC, with narration and all
moondog is in it
I recommend it if you like those 'non music' records
>>66071872
oh
>>66071932
whats the quintet like
>>66071874
Well music from that era is just not going to be quite as interesting imo.
Not until the 30's or 40's I'd say is there songs that can compete with later decades.
So, to be fair to the music from that year, I tried to balance the rates for what was good for the time comparatively.
Now though I'm scratching that and just going off of what I like.
Regardless of artistic merit or any other things and just off of if I like it or not.
>>66072004
That year I can do
But I have only one song there
