why do so many of you dislike this album?
>i-its not a swans record
>sounds too much like angels of light
yeah fair points, but as a record itself, why dislike it?
>>66048207
It's better than Soundtracks for the blind
In my opinion it's like an intro into the seer
one of my favorite swans actually. It sounds most like their early no wave stuff.
Best songs: Jim, Inside Madeline
>>66048207
It doesn't feel fully realized, that's why it bores me. It's like they were dipping their toes in the water so-to-speak in terms of experimenting with the new style of the band.
The opener is the only great song. Outside of that it's an alright record, nothing is all that bad on it, it just isn't very memorable.
>>66048207
The acoustic songs are better than a lot of ones on his later albums.
>>66048207
It's my favorite New Swans album, it doesn't feel pretentious or self indulgent like the later ones.
>>66048207
holy shit just shut the fuck up
