>there are people on /mu/ whose favorite band is radiohead
>there are people on /mu/ who are deaf
>there are people on /mu/ whose favorite band is Lame Impala
>there are people on /mu/ who are dead
>>66033238
>there are bands on mu with two drummers
>there are people on /mu/
>>66033075
>there are people on /mu/ who don't think radiohead is a perfectly valid favorite band
>there are people
>>66033291
>>66033075
>*isn't
>faggot
>there are people, /mu/
>there are
>>66033291
They're a great entry level band, but if you seriously consider them your favourite after your college years, then that tells me you're missing out on much better stuff.
>>66033075
>That one radiohead hating faggot spamming /mu/ with these shitty threads
>There are people on /mu/ who listen to Weezer and Gorillaz and think they have a good taste in music
everyone of these threads just boils down to music being subjective
>>66033918
>There are people on /mu/ who think music is subjective
>>66033491
I'm an entry-level fag. Tell me 5 bands from the next level I should check out please.
>>66033190
>that moment when I'm about to see tame impala literally in 30 minutes
>>66034151
monitoring
>inb4 swans, fishmans, ween
>>66033883
What exactly is wrong about these bands tho. I know weezer is a living meme, but gorillaz? Uh..
>>66033491
>>66034151
tell him anon! tell him about all the stuff he's missing out on!
>there are people on /mu/ who like music
>>66034151
Depends on what you like about Radiohead. If you like their production from their Kid A /Amnesiac era the most like me, check out Burial and Caribou, then try Aphex Twin, Autechre, or other artists on the Warp or Rephlex label.
>there are
>>66034280
>not entry level
exposed
>>66033864
>one
lel you faggot
hard for you to understand it's possible to see through the overinflated acclaim drivel that radiohead's rather mediocre music hides behind?
>>66034296
Fine, I was going to say look into minimalist techno, noise, and music concrete after that anyways.
Happy now, fag?
>>66033918
the hurr it's subjective shit just stifles any possibility of discussion so maybe you should kill yourself
>>66034311
>hard for you to understand it's possible to see through the overinflated acclaim drivel that radiohead's rather mediocre music hides behind?
this sentence is disgusting. use fewer words young blood
>>66033075
>there are people in radiohead whose favorite board is /mu/
You know who
>>66034368
But he's not too far off...
>>66034338
>getting defensive
>citing those genres but not artists
>claims to be out of college but uses the word 'fag'
triple exposed
double exposed
>>66034280
>Burial and Caribou
>even close to Kid A and Amnesiac in quality
so where's the "much better stuff"?
hint: popularity =/=quality, so don't just post obscure stuff
>>66033491
Just because he likes it doesn't mean he hasn't experienced other stuff.
Don't be a contrarian faggot.
>>66034404
>Rob Hood
>Iannis Xenakis
>Tod Dockstader
>Merzbow
Also Mantronix, UR and Afrika Bambaataa are cool too.
>>66034291
Under rated
>>66034389
(a) post anonymously you piece of shit
(b) post anonymously you piece of shit
(c) i was talking about his prose not his point
(d) actually he was pretty far off. i can think of at least two radiohead albums that were pretty much panned, yet in both cases people saw the great music through the panning. for that matter people found a way to love KoL even though it got a lukewarm reception.
(e) radiohead may be overrated but they are not mediocre. muse is mediocre. coldplay is mediocre. you can't seriously argue that radiohead is not significantly better than those kinds of bands
(f) post anonymously you piece of shit
>>66034487
nobody cares dude
>>66034574
>an anon asks for recs
>Nobody cares
Ok
>>66034151
Can
Sonic Youth
My Bloody Valentine
Aphex Twin
Kanye West
>>66034600
you remind me of this guy i know who studies film theory. which is to say, a goober. also mad
>>66034632
Can is the only band where you could even argue they aren't entry level
>>66034660
You remind me of every dumbass poster on 4chan.
The guy was right. Someone asked for recommendations and you said "nobody cares"
How does it feel to be a dumbass?
>>66034534
>being this triggered
I knew you were talking about his prose by using "but" and I could tell by your tone that you didn't appreciate his point either. And I consider Radiohead slightly above mediocre, while Coldplay and Muse (outside of their first albums) are barely listenable garbage.
>>66034690
feels pretty good. yeah i am shitposting, so sue me. btw that post was not him giving recommendations, it was him trying to prove he knows what musique concrete is. and nobody cares.
>>66034735
You cared enough to ask, retard
>>66034718
>using a trip
I didn't even read your post
>>66034758
find the question i asked
>>66034788
>splitting hairs this hard
You cared enough to make a point out of it
>>66034735
shitposting is one thing. being a blatant dumbass is different.
also the anon was genuinely asking for recs, that much is obvious
>>66034802
that guy was being pretentious so i spent a few minutes being a dick to him. i hoped he would make an ass of himself but the most i got was a lot of 'retard' and 'fag' and some palpable frustration. so that's where were at.
also as far as splitting hairs, i mean, i am currently responding to a chain of posts in which i claimed nobody cares, and then it was disputed whether somebody cared. we are all arguing about nothing anyway
>>66034632
This dude knows what's up
>there are people on /mu/ who have only ever heard Creep
>>66033929
How is how we perceive music not subjective?
>>66034888
And my trips are truuuu
>>66034888
newfag
>this fucking thread
perfect reminder to never take /mu/ seriously
holy fuck it is completely implausible to like a band that's entry level to some people just because they need their self-validation.
>>66034280
>>66034632
if this isn't trolling, there are no words
>>66034909
He wasn't talking about perception. Our perception can certainly be subjective. Like if me and my deaf friend listen to Beethoven we're gonna have some different thoughts on it.
But the actual quality of music is objective. Regardless of our silly perceptions.
>>66033301
heroin sure bucked him though :^)
>>66034888
no he doesn't
>>66035004
t. buttblasted radiohead fan
>>66035004
>reminder to never take mu seriously
how could you forget?
>>66035046
>realist about aesthetics
fuck yeah man, way to stand up for what's right
>>66034151
Radiohead are on the top shelf. They're just also popular so you're not allowed to like them. Seriously, I discovered Radiohead almost ten years ago and I still love them
>>66035102
because i read comments and think "holy fuck, this idiot is serious"
so it comes with reminding myself that even if others are serious, they can't be taken seriously.
>>66034632
Kanye is the only one of those that's better than Radiohead, although all are good to great.
>there are people who like radiohead at all
>>66033119
WHAT DID YOU SAY?
>>66035046
Music can be objective when talking about the technical aspects. Like it's harder to write a 20 minute Prog song than a 2 minute Punk song.
But usually when people are talking about objectivity or subjectivity in music it's about the quality of it. And that falls under the realm of perception as you said. So therefore music IS subjective as far as how good we think it is goes.
You could argue that technically complex music is better but even that falls under perception.
>>66034632
Longtime "Radiohead is my favorite band" person here, I've heard all of these artists, and while I love loveless, ege bayamsi, and a few others I can't say any of these were enough to dethrone Radiohead for me. Entry level or not, very few artists have 6 or 7 albums as good as their best
>>66035183
jesus christ
2ebin4me
>>66035004
this desu
>>66034632
>>66034280
absolute apex kek. these are honestly the people who shit on radiohead
radiohead makes god-tier pop music, deriding something for being accessible and entry level is the most boring form of criticism
>>66035664
>radiohead makes god-tier pop music
They don't even manage that senpai
>>66034384
t. /tv/ crossposter
Speaking of, how is A Moon Shaped Pool? Picking up Man Machine Poem from Amazon and need another disk for free shipping.
>>66035700
honestly if you're just being contrarian and hating them because you have le superior taste that's one thing, but if you honestly can't appreciate great simple shit like let down/karma police/airbag i feel bad for you
it's like hating early beatles
>there
>>66035755
I am sorry but they don't even come close to the early Beatles, or any other good pop acts like The Beach Boys or Bowie. They're mediocre as fuck.
>>66035703
i dont get it
>people
>>66035046
>He wasn't talking about perception
Well he said music so he must have been. Because what is or is not considered "music" is up to the view (or the artist, depending on your view of art criticism)
>But the actual quality of music is objective
OK I'll take the b8.
How do you measure the quality objectively?
>>66035800
u gotta be bait'n me, matey
>>66034151
Butthole Surfers
Mecury Rev
Half Japanese
Captain Beefheart
Red House Painters
>>66035800
i'm not saying they were that good, but that ok computer is an objectively good album, at least an 8/10. its universally acclaimed, and you're being pretty contrarian
>>66035710
it's not bad at all imo. Definitely worth a listen or 5.
>>66036245
All of these bands are great, but so is Radiohead.
>>66033075
>there are people on /mu/ who are unironically poptimists
>>66033273
R.I.P. Viper
