[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>tfw you really like an album but it's below a 7.0 on
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 4
File: 1448131799312.gif (199 KB, 336x468) Image search: [Google]
1448131799312.gif
199 KB, 336x468
>tfw you really like an album but it's below a 7.0 on pitchfork and you really are just a misguided pleb so you delete it to be safe

feels bad. i hate when that happens
>>
>>66030843
Add 2 points to the score if its a white gu
Subtract 1 for non black poc
Subtract 2 for black artists

There you go. The pfork scores are instantly slightly more accurate.
>>
>>66030843
Are you fucking serious?
>>
I know this is a drollthread but nobody should ever do this.

Come out of the music closet OP. be proud and unapologetic. be you and don't let anyone get you down.
>>
>>66030843
this and "does /mu/ like death metal with Evanescence album" are the two worst shitpost threads.
>>
File: shrug.png (540 KB, 709x531) Image search: [Google]
shrug.png
540 KB, 709x531
>>66030843
This. I don't listen to anything than gets less than BNM.

>>66031024
Nah sorry, I have an image to maintain.
>>
>>66031047
>does /mu/ like death metal with Evanescence album
ha! that's kecky.
>>
>>66030973
yeah, i'm trying to get a better taste in music.
>>
i delete anything from my computer that is less than 3.5 on rym even if it was one of my favorite albums. it would be really embarassing if anyone ever saw me with a lower album
>>
>>66031257
pleb
>>
>>66031257
true patrician words
>>
>>66031257
Then what do you do with albums that fluctuate between 3.50 and 3.49? I know you're joking, but there must be someone out there that is very stupid like this
>>
>>66032875
I wrote a script to continually check/prune my collection.
>>
>>66030843

WHO CARES

now if SCARUFFI gives an album you like a bad score, then you're fucked
>>
>>66034696
It scares me that you might actually be pleb enough to be being serious with this.
>>
>>66031063
>I have an image to maintain.
You act like you want to look like a misguided p4k-drone
>>
File: 1428041735331.jpg (40 KB, 535x577) Image search: [Google]
1428041735331.jpg
40 KB, 535x577
>>66034696
>tfw Scaruffi gives your favorite album a 6/10
>have to delete it from my hard drive forever
>>
>>66034793

Scaruffi>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>shitfork
>>
WHY DO PEOPLE LET CRITICS DESIDE WHAT TO DO IN THEIR LIVES FUCKING END YOURSELF YOU PATHETIC PEOPLE
>>
>>66035421
Just assume retard posts like the OP are trolls. Even if they're legitimately brain damaged, it feels better to pretend it's on purpose.
>>
Nice thread
saw the exact same one posted a few days ago
almost triggered/10
>>
File: MGMT_Congratulations.jpg (31 KB, 325x325) Image search: [Google]
MGMT_Congratulations.jpg
31 KB, 325x325
Don't worry OP, I know that feel. What you have to do is realize a. Pitchfork scores are mostly paid and are irrelevant (they care more about image than music really) b. Music is subjective, so you can enjoy pretty much anything and anyone who says something is objectively good or bad is an idiot.

I used to be like you, I really liked pic related but it had pretty bad reviews all over the place. I just decided not to give a crap about scores and the funny thing is I found it's pretty liked here in /mu/. It's all subjective, don't worry.
>>
>>66035582
>I just decided not to give a crap about validation and the funny thing is I found validation somewhere else
>>
>>66034940
Human waste>Rape>School shootings>Terrorism>Cancer>World hunger>Stalin>>>>>>AIDS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Piero "the memeo" Scaruffi
>>
>>66035908
>I'm a virgin

Good to know...
>>
>>66036259
>he pointed out the contradiction in my normalfag worldview
>better resort to ad hominem!
Was it worth it? Do you feel validated now?
>>
>>66035908
I never said I found validation here, /mu/ hates a lot of albums I like.
Thread replies: 27
Thread images: 4

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.