Was he a pedo?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Was he a pedo?
>>66006983
Absolutely
He had child torture porn in a hidden closed, where have you been?
>>66006983
maybe
>>66006983
DIS NIKKA GAVE US BILLIE JEAN YOU SAY HE TOUCHED THESE KIDS
>>66006983
Yes dumbass
He loved rapin the kiddies
Fun Fact: the word pedo in spanish means "fart".
>>66007012
*closet
>>66006983
No but I am ;)
>>66006983
Nope
>>66006983
There is literally nothing wrong with being attracted to children
>>66007169
you are trying to slander the great person who is montie, downvoted
I don't know but he was definitely a freak
>>66007169
thank god you aren't Montie, otherwise I'd be agreeing with him
>>66007012
Nigga this has been disproven. The "raid" where those tabloids say the porn was found was an FBI raid, and everything they found was documented. Guess what wasn't documented? Porn of any kind.
>>66007204
Oh shit
Literally no evidence.
animal gore videos were found inside his home
>>66006983
Since pedo literally means a child, yes. He was a child. Then he became an adult.
yes
When I listen to the lyrics I wonder if it does any good
rip michael jackson
he touched so many
>>66007221
They released the FBI reports and it is real.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1355042/investigators-found-creepy-life-size-dolls-of-children-inside-michael-jacksons-neverland-ranch-during-2003-raid/
>2014
>17
>Xscape comes out
>See cover
>He's attractive to me in the picture for some reason
>Start thinking of fantasies where he looks exactly what he looks like on the cover fucking me
>Still do this occasionaly
>One of my favorite fantasies
>>66006983
>pedo
stupid fucking americans
>>66007221
>>66007012
If it was real why wasn't it used to bring him down?
no but they found a ton of pics with childrens faces photoshopped on to adult bodies its complicated
>>66006983
Of course. Now those kids he diddled are going to become diddlers themselves.
Serious question, why has no one else actually came out, and why have the now older accusers from before came out? Are they seriously just never ever going to mention it again?
who cares, thriller is a great pop album. if it took the mind of a pedophile to create that, so be it.
dude was molested by his father and never had a childhood since he was on tour and shit. Of course that fucks you up.
>>66007989
lol
no, he wasn't. he was acquitted of ALL charges against him, and all of this new bullshit coming up from websites like "HotNewCelebVideos.com" is obviously fucking fake. they're just picking the person with a history of suspicion against him who also happens to be one of the biggest pop icons in history in an effort to exploit mass amounts of people to give their websites money through google ad-sense.
>rest in peace
>>66013660
>he was acquitted of ALL charges against him
that literally doesn't prove anything. Look at the pictures of the 2003 FBI raid, which I linked here >>66008771 .
>>66013429
Ahem
>>66013747
co-create, whatever. not to deny quincy jones' contributions, but jackson co-produced and wrote a number of the tracks. plus much of the appeal lies in his impeccable performance.
>>66013354
it was settled out of court. some of them were paid huge amounts of money to shut up about it
No cause if anyone diddled my kid no amount of money would make me go away. As a matter of fact you'd be lucky to live long enough to be arrested.
He was a closetted gay man that never had a childhood and grew up in a very masculine house. His older brothers fucked groupies in front of him when he was a kid
>>66013891
>it isn't true because my gut says so
>>66013891
I don't care that he was abused as a child, I don't give a FUCK.
I want to fuck his daughter
4chan says no
AAAAAAAA
>>66007287
Little known fact: Michael Jackson got $0 in royalties for his most popular video.
"Shoveldog"
>>66006983
Nah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pnoQqlygQs
absolutely not and anyone who believes he did has done zero research on it and bases their opinion on tabloid articles and their own perception of the man
>>66006983
Absolutely yes.
>>66014898
yeah but the photographs
>>66014949
are untrue. if they were legally raided in 2003 why were they not used as evidence or ever mentioned in court dumbass
>>66015110
how can a photograph be untrue? don't know the details of the case but if they were obtained illegally that just protects him from being prosecuted, it doesn't mean that they're fake
>>66006983
That's ignorant
