Albums people think are innovative but actually aren't
You start, OP
Remain In Light
Kid A
Is This It
Turn on the Bright Lights
Demon Days
VU&N
>>65888704
get the fuck out of here with ITI
>>65888704
>Remain in Light
What the fuck, it was objectively innovative
>>65888504
>>65888704
maybe not innovative per se but definitely influential
>>65888704
>>65888743
Thats the least innovative album there, seriously fucking how?
>>65888743
it's not innovative tho
catchy and a great album yes, innovative no
>>65888755
>ripping off African music
>innovative
>>65888504
>inb4 someone posts Velvet Underground & Nico
>>65888785
The production was innovative; besides-- implementing an element not common in western culture should be considered innovative in a sense either way
>>65888755
>objectively innovative
cute opinion
talking heads are just a shit new wave band
>>65888738
lol
>>65888504
sixts
>>65888767
ok, maybe not innovative, but influential, yeah?
>>65888504
Beatles discography
>>65888893
>People will defend this and not Aphex Twin
/mu/ everybody
>>65888888
>>65888893
How is SAW not innovative?
>>65888888
fuck your opinions but nice digits if I do say so myself
>>65888939
Maybe because The Beatles actually pioneered new studio techniques while RDJ didn't do anything new not even realtive to the rest of the Warp roster.
1000%
>Xtal
>not innovative
>>65888888
sexts don't lie
>>65888888
check 'em hexes
>>65888943
How Beatles was innovative?
>>65889840
Just go and educate yourself about it, you don't need people on an image board to teach you that.
what the hell do you know most of you weren't even born when these albums were released fucking twats I swear
>>65889907
nice argument faggot. the truth is that Beatles did nothing new.
>>65888888
w i t n e s s e d
