8/10
Remember when people on /mu/ were calling this the pet sounds of the 2000's?
>>65846820
6/10, except in non-inflated ratings, unlike what p4k has where unless it's 8/10 or above, it's bad
>>65846847
If you by "this" you mean MPP, then yes, I have seen that opinion thrown around. A lot more than it has for PW
even 6/10 is reaching OP
>>65846820
Objectively their worst album.
6/10 at best.
>>65846820
7.5/10
still very good, underrated honestly. definitely superior to centipede hz
>>65846820
i agree
7/10, people weren't expecting the ultra precise style but it's actually pretty interesting to hear from them. A lot of Panda's songs are pretty subtle but actually great, like Summing the Wretch, which works well as a compliment to Avey's more immediate songwriting style.
>>65846820
5/10 fucking boring and gets annoying fast.
Was very disappointing.
>>65847269
7/10, definitely NOT superior to CHZ though.
>>65848050
CHz is like half pretty good and half the worst stuff they've ever done though
>>65848253
that's not even that edgy; I rated it lower than OP and said it was better than what is often considered their worst album