http://pitchfork.com/news/66111-watch-pitchforktvs-brief-history-of-dad-rock/
>dadrock is officially real and undeniable
thoughts on this?
Slowpoke.png
>>65788992
>>dadrock is officially real and undeniable
It's been real for a decade now. Are you retarded?
>>65788992
dad rock already was a thing 15 years ago man
>>65788992
fuck pitchfork
>>65788992
>>dadrock is officially real and undeniable
boi
I hope you are not implying /mu/ made up the term dadrock
>>65788992
>pitchfork is hiring /mu/tants
stop shilling
good, now that Pitchfork has legitimized it people will stop listening to it.
fucking ridiculous that shit like the Beatles is still popular these days
>>65790148
Dadrock came from pitchfork you literal child
there is literally nothing wrong with dadrock
>>65790514
>thinking pitchfork is relevant
lmaoing at ur life desu senpai baka
The first citation for dad-rock is from 1994 and the Glasgow Herald. Also they get it wrong right away as the etymology hasn't changed only the meaning.
>>65790514
>attaching a stigma to long established good music will stop people from listening to it
>>65790514
Yeah who would want to listen to music that's actually good? Why don't more people listen to tmr?
>>65788992
Hilarity
>>65790611
>thinking anything else
you're the same as the people who take reviews by the rolling stone seriously
>>65788992
what an embarrassing thing to publish on your online music journalism webpage
>>65790999
nah, I actually exist
also, check'd
>>65788992
Is that supposed to be Paul McCartney?
Fuck Pitchfork.
>>65790933
honestly if you think the beatles can hold a candle to beefheart it's time to leave the board
>>65794772
>>65794772
>being this much of a fucking scruffy drone