>don't worry bro the discrepancy in the drum mix at 15:36 is just a watermark!
>it wont be there in the official release!
ITS STILL FUCKING THERE YOU IDIOTS. HOLY FUCK HOW DID JOHN FUCKING CONGLETON FUCK UP *THIS* BAD
It's a stylistic choice obviously
>>65736304
Oh wow stylistically making the album sound shitty. That's cool
>>65736354
wabi sabi
FUCKING HACK
>>65736279
Autism speaks
>>65736629
>being critical of a producer with a proven track record is autism
>expecting quality mixing on a Swans album is autism
>>65736645
Yes.
Wait, on which track?
>>65738094
Frankie M
>>65736279
wait i thought congleton was SJW, why would he work with gira
>>65738487
Gee, I don't know. I mean, this is just a shot in the dark, but bear with me.. Maybe he's capable of putting aside his assumptions and political inclinations for the sake of art? Nah, you're probably right, Marian, it's 2016. Things like that don't happen 'round here.
*adjusts stetson and spits in hes spitcup*
I can't even hear it
>>65736279
Straw Poll lads get in here and cast your vote beofore Pitchfork and Fantano!
STRAW POLL
http://www.strawpoll.me/10511548
STRAW POLL
http://www.strawpoll.me/10511548
STRAW POLL
http://www.strawpoll.me/10511548
damn that's some pretty amateur shit, and even if it was intentional it would have been much more pleasing to just let it fade out normally
>discrepancy
You don't know what this word means.
>>65739268
There's a discrepancy between how it sounds and how it should sound. You fucking cuck
>>65739283
>how it should sound
How do you know how it should sound?
>>65739283
Yeah, that's still wrong. Try again.
Is this a double album? I have it split up with the first four and last four tracks in different disks, but is that how it actually should be, or is it just a really long single album?
>>65739299
It shouldn't sound like shit that's for sure
>>65739303
Sorry I'm dumb
>>65739310
It is split by two discs.
>>65739474
Dope
What's he singing in Finally Peace? It sounds like "The glory is mine" but it could be "the glorious mind"
YOU HEARD IT HERE FOLKS
0/10
SWANS FUCKING T E R M I N A T E D
>>65740732
Your glorious mind IIRC
>>65739474
Have the physical copy in my lap; can confirm
>>65736645
Oh my fcuking god /mu/ users are really REALLY stupid. Ill have to write this in caps so this philistine faggots can get it into their little heads: NITPICKY ERRORS DONT DEFINE THE WORK'S QUALITY. THE BIG PICTURE CAPTURES IF AN ALBUM IS GOOD OR BAD, NOT THE SLIPS AND DIMINUTE FLAWS THAT ANY HUMAN CAN MAKE.
>>65736279
17:59, wtf. Does it get quieter for a second for anyone else? Just ripped the CD, maybe it's just me.
Dear god it's literally for a split second and not even that bad you people are fucking ridiculous. I listened to the album in full twice and didn't notice until someone pointed it out.
>>65740865
2001: A Space Odyssey has continuity errors, does that make it less of a great film?
NO, THE ANSWER IS NO, YOU LITERALLY RETARDED SCUM.
>>65740911
exactly.
The slower version of Frankie M is a lot better
>>65740919
does it?
>>65740938
>>65740911
fuck you guys it makes it sound bad and its amateurish as fuck
i think it sounds neat :)
>>65740919
oh cool where? I don't recall seeing those the when I watched the film.
>>65740919
There wasn't anything noticeable that people would talk about on /tv/ were it released today.
Your comparison is shit.
>>65742071
You're complaining about a split second mixing issue in a fucking 20 minute song. Even if it did sound bad (which it really doesn't) it's over in an instant. Get a grip.
>>65736279
What the fuck am I supposed to be hear that's wrong?
>>65736279
that's clearly intentional fucker & not even a bad choice
>>65740911
I have yet to hear this
>>65736279
>Everything needs to sound pretty damn it!
if it's intentional it's neat, if it's unintentional (doubt it) who fucking cares. least important thing people have pretended to get mad about on 4chan dot org this year
Can't believe people are actually defending this shit
Can't believe people are actually attacking this shit
senpai
