JAKE BUGG BTFO
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
>It's a Laura Snapes review
Did he call her a bitch or something?
>it's a review by a spoiled rich kid bitch blogger brat
Laura Snapes can suck my cock
>>65732161
Wow, didn't think that I'd be around to see this, pitchfork is correct.
>>65732161
YASSSS QUEEN
SLAYYYYY
DRAG HIM
>>65732204
>all other reviews are positive about the album, except for pitchfork's
>it's a laura snapes review
>she says bugg is uninspired, a "straight outta clifton" fake gangsta on a song and doesn't even talk about the music itself
Absolutely.
>/mu/ defending Jake Bugg because the reviewer is a woman
kek
lets just be honest and admit both laura snapes and jake bugg are trash
>>65732328
the reviewer is a *bitch
>>65732328
The album's not great, but it's a 5-6 not great, not a 3.0 not great.
>>65732285
kek'd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o70e7Nb8SVM
This jumps out to me as something that would've been a good song if it had been performed by anyone other than a person with THAT voice... sounds like Cage the Elephant if they decided to collaborate with Dr. Luke or some other in-demand top 40 producer. Kinda gross tbqh familia.
Jake Bugg is such a fucking phony
It enrages me the autists here would rather defend his plastic Bob Dylan impersonator ass than agree with le evil sjw
>>65732328
>/mu/ defending Jake Bugg because the reviewer is a spoiled cracker sack of living tumors
FIFY
Get ready for the Puberty 2 review from Privilege 2
>>65732161
I'm enjoying it a lot right now shrugs
who the fuck is jake bugg and why are you people sucking his cock?
>>65732559
kinda privileged desu senpai
>when the critic is so disgusting it manages to make mu defend jake bugg
never change mu
>>65732644
Yes, I hate Jake Bugg but I wouldn't touch Severus Snapes in a million years
>>65732644
>I actually quite like Jake Bugg
jake bugg is such utter fucking trash, even if she'd blasted him for being a straight white male stealing guitar music from black people i'd still not be annoyed
>>65732644
Jake bugg really isn't that bad
>>65732490
this fucking douche trying to make a stone roses song jesus christ
>feel as many others do that jake bugg is awful
>this review is so hypocritical and snide that i almost want to defend him
crossroads
>>65732161
These music "reviewers" surely can't be payed all that much... Right? This is one of te worst things I've read and I don't even like his music.
>>65732328
Except no one is defending him.
We're just whining about the reviewer.
Plus it's not as if he needed any defense, the NME is still sucking his dick and they will probably never stop.
The review's shit, but anyone expecting Pitchfork to give a good review to an English artist that isn't electronica and/or Radiohead is deluded.
>>65732876
Their writers can afford to live in places like Chicago, New York, and London so they must make enough. But, we must take into account that these are people who graduated from liberal arts colleges and have had most costs in their lives financed by their suburban parents. They like to think they can empathize with the struggles of the black communities within the US and other politically and economically disenfranchised groups across the world by writing a P4K editorial piece in their nice air conditioned office in the Conde Nast 1 WTC office. Please fuck off Laura Snips.
>>65733059
>>65732161
objectively correct
>>65733059
I always wonder what kind of person actually writes posts like this. Like what have you experienced in your life that makes you think that you're at all qualified to make these kind of value judgements about another person?
>>65733321
That's pretty much my reaction to this review.
>>65733321
Honestly, he is just throwing p4k's reasoning back to them.
>music journalism consists of feminists and nu-males
Whys this?
The review wasn't even that bad lol
>>65732490
My thoughts exactly. I want to like that song, gives me some Stone Roses vibes but the voice is fucking awful. Sounds like it was recorded poorly too.
>>65733321
I wrote that. I'm also OP, as I was responding to someone who directed their question to me. What do you want to know about me? I believe that a lot of music journalists are highly deluded. These value judgments are a product of their egregious journalism.
>>65733033
do pitchfork not like the uk?
>>65733660
They have a habit of trashing mainstream British indie groups
>>65733660
>>65733708
Even less mainstream ones as well to be honest. I think anything the NME likes they take to hating.
>>65733708
interesting, i don't read pitchfork too often so i'm not familiar with their tendencies
although i might agree with them somewhat here, i'm from london and a lot of big indie music from here is pretty bad
>>65733321
Laura pls go
>>65732545
>>65732604
I'd hatefuck her and cum on her fivehead
>>65733928
That's what went through my mind too. It sounded like it was coming from her.
>>65733476
they all have liberal arts degrees and were too scared to do anything actually worthwhile or creative
>>65733633
respect op, good work
