What do you do to make sure you get the perfect music quality?
>>65632495
what is it that makes this picture so funny?
>>65632495
By being ignorant
Just make sure it's encoded in a lossless format and run it through a spectrum analyzer to make sure.
I pump and grease my beautiful muscles.
>>65632495
>cables touching the floor
Amateur
>>65632495
>2016
>not listening to music in space or at least antigravitational environments
>beeing this pleb not even paying 200 xlox saturnian credits for a metaflac player
>>65632513
underrated
saturation>quality t b h
there is no reason to try to get a perfect sound unless you produce music and want to study the technique.
>>65632495
i stopped giving a fuck, mostly use spotify now after being a FLAC nazi for years..
i say this having a benchmark dac sitting in front of me but i'm using my laptop speakers right now out of convenience
I don't really understand why people make fun of the pic. It's probably the setup I would get if money was no object. Are they making fun of spending that amount of money just to get better sound? If so, come on, upgrading your setup is as much of a fun hobby as any, even if the returns are massively diminished
>>65632984
>listening to music in space
can't hear anything in a vacuum nigga
>>65633309
>not wiring the drivers to directly vibrate your eardrums
>>65632502
overkill setup with a mac, big useless cables.
>>65633006
This. People who spend over $50 on audio playback equipment (and they don't produce) have autism
>>65633733
>>65632495
>Digital guru Dan Lavry (Lavry Engineering) listening to the rig I brought, which included a MacBook Pro with lossless files optically feeding the Lavry DA11 (as DAC), which, via Cardas Clear interconnects, was feeding the Ray Samuels Audio Raptor which was driving the Sennheiser HD 800. Power cables were Cardas Golden Reference AC and TARA Labs RSC Air AC. Perfect power was courtesy of PS Audio's PowerPlant Premier. This rather simple rig produced some of the best sound I heard at the show.
>This rather simple rig
>rather simple
>simple
>>65633791
>>65633759
But seriously, you don't need perfect sound. Spending money on LISTENING to music is just a way to justify the claim that listening to music is a legitimate hobby
>>65633863
or it makes it sound better
>>65633879
Well spend as much as you want on that I guess. Not my problem. Just seems like a waste to go so far overboard
>>65633795
Is he the face of audiophiliac autism?
>>65633952
he's a fucking legend tbqh, lavry converters are the dogs bollocks
>>65633969
He looks p punchable
>>65633969
Also stop being British, your culture is over
>>65634026
maybe but he can move at a significantly higher sample rate than most humans
>>65633795
not sure if you have downs but yes, aside from the power conditioner, it's a simple rig..
high quality, but still simple.
