Do you think we'll ever see this chart substantially change?
>>65625602
>The Rolling Stones
>>65625602
Almost all of those albums have been deeply seated in music culture of their own respective communities, so I doubt things will be removed any time soon. If anything it might get longer.
Also Tago Mago>Future Days
>>65625602
Does Hatful of Hollow even qualify?
>>65625602
Some that shouldn't qualify:
>Wu-Tang Clan
>Low End Theory
>Songs of Leonard Cohen
>Blood on the Tracks
>Illmatic
>Dummy
>Rubber Soul
>Hunky Dory
>Kind of Blue
>Liquid Swords
>The Velvet Underground
>After the Gold Rush
>On the Beach
>Odessey and Oracle
This is objectively correct and cannot be debated.
>>65626110
>kind of blue
HAHAHAHA
>>65625602
I hope to get Rusty on there someday myself. Four Great Points as well.
>>65625946
it cant get longer, this is specifically a top 100 list
>>65626110
>kind of blue
Hey rockist
>>65626009
Not as good as The Queen is Dead but still classic Smiths. I'd say one of the better albums to come out of new wave
>>65625602
Is this the RYM all time list?
>>65627177
I like Rusty but I feel like Spiderland kind of encapsulates everything on that album and more.
>>65627821
>I like Rusty but I feel like Spiderland kind of encapsulates everything on that album and more.
I'm not so sure. Rusty feels like the culmination of years of hardcore like Squirrel Bait, Bastro, Fugazi, etc. It's thematically superb, rivals and surpasses Spiderland technically (but Spiderland's more universal themes, subtler vocals, and simpler (not a slur in the least) songs win people over the majority of the time). I truly believe it's one of the best rock albums ever made, and at the least deserves a spot alongside Spiderland. Thankfully its notability is only increasing as the years go on.
>>65625602
On what planet is Tago Mago below Loveless and Kind of Blue below anything?
this is so much better than rolling stones' chart
