Just want some feedback on my buddys instrumental album.
Post your projects and ill give feedback as well.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbEQWsCqqZsO4klBgFsE9WQf25ecQpDCK
>>65467745
>my buddys instrumental album.
>posts a picture of a vocal mic
>>65467745
Check my shit out
Getting pretty popular in atl
https://m.soundcloud.com/ronniescholarship/suntrust-1
>>65467804
Sounds good man keep it up
>I want feedback
>J-j-just on my buddy's band hehe, it's t-totally not mine
>>65467893
So edgy
>>65467763
i chuckled
>>65467882
Thanks follow and tell a friend
I could totes dig this. Good production, sounds noice!
>>65467763
not necessarily mang
>>65468016
>not necessarily mang
Be real, his entire album is sample-based DAW bloopity blop
>>65468059
yes it is. i was just making the point that the pitcher in the OP isn't necessarily a vocal mic. my pic is of an instrument mic, for example
>>65468114
>my pic is of an instrument mic, for example
Which was not used in the making of the album.
Are you retarded or something?
>>65468154
I wasn't implying it was. You accused OP of posting a pic of a vocal mic and I was simply saying it actually might be an instrument mic. I wasn't making any comment about OP or the music or the production or whether or not it used mics at all. Just about the photo.
Reading comprehension man.
>>65468259
>You accused OP of posting a pic of a vocal mic and I was simply saying it actually might be an instrument mic
Not relevant because >>65468059
A mic wasn't used AT ALL. Your criticism doesn't work.
>>65468259
>I wasn't making any comment about OP or the music or the production or whether or not it used mics at all.
Ah sounds like your fault for not reading the thread
>>65468395
>this is a vocal mic
>no it might be an instrument mic actually
>OP DIDN'T USE A MIC ARE YOU RETARDED
>>65468395
>>65468154
>>65468059
Clearly trying to save face because of being wrong about the mic
guy 1 said it's a vocal mic, guy 2 said "not necessarily" and implied that it could be a mic used for instruments
Whether or not the music in the OP uses a mic is completely irrelevant
>>65468496
Correct, it is the same logical argument in which the OP is posting a pic not associated with the content and is being intentionally misleading.
>>65468519
See above. It's all a part of one logical argument.
Nice try though.
>>65468519
thanks anon for getting it. the fuckery was just too much for me to deal with for a moment there.
>>65468584
Since neither vocal nor instrument mics were used, that anon was right all along, and you are just an autistic idiot.
>>65468626
Complete non sequitur
>that anon
(you)
>>65468626
>>65468659
I don't think you know what non sequitur means.
>>65468675
What makes you think I'm joking?
