5.0
Great
4.5
Good
4.0
Average
3.5
Mediocre
3.0
Okay
2.5
Had its moments
2.0
Did not like
1.5
Bad
1.0
Really bad
0.5
Awful
>>65458772
>Amy Poelher above Amy Shumer
>Roony Mara above Elizabeth Banks
Bisexual spotted.
>>65458772
why the fuck is Queen Latifah lower than either of those two Amys
>>65458843
>defending Amy Schumer in any way
wew
>>65458817
>4.0/5.0
>Average
>5
good
>4.5
bad
>4
bad
>3.5
bad
>3
bad
>2.5
bad
>2
bad
>1.5
bad
>1
bad
>0.5
bad
Simple is best imo
>>65458850
>Thinking Amy Poehler belongs in comedy beyond a shitty local improv group.
But lad....
>>65458772
>rooney over banks and blanchett
>5
best
>4
like it
>3
ok
>2
shit
>all this half-number autism
>>65458918
>implying I said anything about Amy Poehler
learn to read nigga
>>65458772
Absolutely fantastic taste my nigga
>2016
light to decent 8
decent 8
9
forever
>>65458817
terrible
>5
Must listen / genre defining
>4
Well executed. Doesnt do anything too new or wildy different, but still a solid record
>3
Average. Worth a listen.
>2
I understand some of the appeal, but don't like it much. Easily forgettable.
>1
Avoid at all costs.
![c7e73139f629b99a260acd18dea3c602[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/4Ej2YnW.png "c7e73139f629b99a260acd18dea3c602[1].png")
I think Bad / Awful aren't differentiated well enough but otherwise I like this.
>>65458997
this is good
>>65458848
Queen Latifah is at least 4.0
>>65458817
>4.0
>Average
Do you know what average even means? Kys
>>65459045
>implying symmetric distribution
>>65458997
This system implies an almost objective look at the music. This is weird to me, considering music is very subjective, and some of my favorite music is quite "flawed".
>>65458772
1/5 ign video game ratings
>>65459097
>use curse words in a rating system
2edgy
>>65459065
>implying we had to already know you had autism
>>65459065
i'm mad but i can't figure out why a symmetric rating system is better than any other so i guess maybe you're right idk
>>65459065
>>65459136
Asymmetric should only be used to rate how good something is, though. Having a detailed scale of shittyness is fucking redundant and utterly pointless as something being shit in the first place makes it not worthwhile.
>>65459153
I remember one critic saying the worst years in popular music were 1980, 1990, and 2001. I never understood that.
>>65459153
>only one 80s year
>it's 86
How pleb can you get?
>>65459186
>1980
>muh 70s are over
>1990
>nirvana hasn't saved rawk yet
>2001
>music is changing...
>>65458994
would there be a 5 that isn't that great? for example straight outta Compton isn't that great imp and yet it defined hip hop for the mainstream audience.
>>65459239
>>65459097
>>65459005
These are good
>>65458997
This one the best
![INCREDIBLE rotating pepe [3D].gif](https://i.imgur.com/2EKf8WN.gif "INCREDIBLE rotating pepe [3D].gif")
>>65459239
>>65459097
>2.5
>Average
>>65459318
It's smack dab in the middle. How is it not average?
5
Everybody.
4
Fans of similar genres.
3
Fans of the genre.
2
Fans of the band.
1
Completionists only.
>>65459386
this is p nice, but needs an 'avoid' rating
>>65459153
>5.0
>not 1991
wew lad
>>65458997
I like this one
>>65459347
no it isnt
>>65459318
>Average of the rating system
>Not the average
>>65459595
its not the average of the rating system you retard
>>65459560
>please stop
>kill it with fire
>nuke it from orbit
ebÃn
just signed up
>>65459608
0 is not on there because it's all the shit you don't even bother listening to.
>>65459631
>>65459631
ebic
>>65458997
>Boring
>>65459640
that doesnt even make sense, how can I know that I wouldn't even give it a 0.5 if I have never listened to it
There is nothing better
>>65458772
You have a disturbing taste in women.
>>65459027
weeaboo
5.0
Personal favorite
4.5
Masterpiece, essential
4.0
Classic record
3.5
Recommended/AOTY Contender
3.0
Good/Sufficient
2.5
So-so
2.0
I won't listen to it again
1.5
Awful record
1.0
Waste of time
0.5
Personal hate
>>65459867
kek, wrong image
>>65459880
>1.0
>Meh
>0.5
>Annoying Music
>>65459880
>that low amount of ratings
Did you start listening to music last year?
>>65459903
no, I've restarted my rym account twice, and since Nov of the past years I've been only relistening to what I have in order to remember what all of my database sounds like
I'd rather do that than listening to a random album I won't remember how sounds, everyday
>>65458817
>4.0
>Average
>3.5
>Mediocre
>3.0
>Okay
are you retarded? these three mean essentially the same thing.
>>65459027
This triggers me heavily although I respect ur 5
>>65459027
>3.0 asuza nakano
>>65459318
>2.5
>Not average
It takes a especial kind of autism to think otherwise.
Rating scales should be objective desu
The numbers mean what they mean
>>65461457
anon you are probably retarded since you don't seem to understand basic things about maths and english
the more i used rym the more i found that summing up vague feelings with concrete numbers only serves to drive me mad
>>65458994
>Avoid at all costs.
i always found it kinda silly that people put this in their reviews, it will only make me wanna listen to it
>>65459027
>hhh
>2.0
apply yourself
>>65458772
>heroin addict as #1
fucking disgusting.
5.0
Near perfect
4.5
It's okay
4.0
Great
3.5
Very good
3.0
Good
2.5
Average
2.0
Sub par
1.5
Bad
1.0
Awful
0.5
Abysmal
i keep it simple
>>65461743
like the romans
>>65461849
put the pussy in the sarcophagus
This is actually my films ratings but I'm more proud of it than of the music ones.
>>65459676
literally autism
>>65461895
based
>>65461895
>anything after season 9 in the top half
>principal and the pauper a 2/5
honestly, you should have just made everything after homer vs new york a 0.5
>>65461895
>Who shot mr. Burns
>4
fucking hell that is embarassing, why don't you put something good on there like blowfish or pta disbands or homer at the bat
5 - all time fav
4 - great
3 - good
2 - so-so/mixed
1 - do not like
I don't do half ratings.
>>65458918
>Thinking Amy Poehler belongs in comedy beyond a shitty local improv group.
She was fine on Upright Citizens Brigade.
>>65461944
Honestly a lot of episodes coul go on 4/5 but Who Shot Mr. Burns? stands up because of nostalgia reasons, it used to be on TV a lot when I was a kid. Also the Burns' Suit scene.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICGwfkAYwr0
>>65461936
>you should have just made everything after homer vs new york a 0.5
I'm one of the ones who believe Classic ends at Thirty Minutes Over Tokyo and the decent episodes at Behind the Laughter. S10-13 are not top class but they have a good bunch of nice episodes.
>>65461999
but its not good and no referencing twin peaks does not mean it is good
>>65461501
anon you are probably retarded since you don't seem to understand basic things about maths and english
Someone help me think of a word for 2.5 please
>>65462019
wow what a clever response you fucking mongrel, why don't you shut the fuck up until you can figure out how to work out an average you inbred
>>65461999
Yeah, there are a few good episodes here and there, but I think everything post season 8 just pales in comparison to the original seasons. I just personally disagree that your rating system is so heavy on the later seasons.
>>65462032
Substandard
>>65462012
>referencing twin peaks does not mean it is good
i'm shallow enough to believe this is false
>>65462039
wow what a clever response you fucking mongrel, why don't you shut the fuck up until you can figure out how to work out an average you inbred
>>65462057
As I said, it's what I used to watch a lot when growing up. For some reason the local stations loved Season 10, for example.
5.0 - Perfect/Nearly Perfect
4.5 - Fantastic
4.0 - Great.
3.5 - Really good
3.0 - Pretty good, enjoyable.
2.5 - Average/middle of the road. Might give another listen in the future
2.0 - Not very good. Wouldn't listen again
1.5 - Not good.
1.0 - Bad.
0.5 - Twenty One Pilots
>words to describe score
Actual autism.
>>65462059
Thank you good sir
>>65462146
Any fucking idiot can transpose a star score to a 10-point score.
>>65462146
>numbers to describe another number of essentially the same value
>>65462146
>just wrote the same fraction multiplied by 2, thereby telling us nothing about your rating model
actually retarded
>>65462235
>>65462240
>>65462249
you buttblasted idiots stay with your faggy "extraordinaire" "fantastique" "shiny butt" descriptors lmao
1. shit
2. indifference
3. ok
4. good
5. great
autists
what a load of faggots, best rating system coming through:
>i like it
>i don't
anything else and you're an autist
>>65462290
>>65462146
can you please write next to the out of 10 scores what those scores would be out of 100, i'm a bit unsure as to how they would work as percentages.
>>65462299
skogwald?
5.0 - Old /b/
4.5 - Old /x/
4.0 - /mu/
3.5 - /a/
3.0 - /co/
2.5 - /v/
2.0 - Modern /x/
1.5 - /pol/
1.0 - /tv/
0.5 - Modern /b/
>>65458772
>like it
>dont like it
music isnt rocket sicence, folks
>>65462321
>i'm a bit unsure as to how they would work as percentages.
That's because the 'tism is kicking in bro lol
>>65462353
please can you put in percentages and also what they would be if they were out of 25
>>65462329
>Old /b/
>Good
>/a/
>Good
>/co/
>Good
>/tv/
>Bad
>>65462329
>[s4s]
>nowhere to be seen
what did he mean by this
>>65462415
>/tv/
>not the worst media board
>>65459676
best itt
>>65462442
but /co/ is obviously the worst media board unless you legitimately have some form of autism
+++: passionate
++: interesting
+: not bad / catchy
/: meh
-: decieving / bad / shit
Passionate is also divided into tiers.
All ratings below 5/10 are the same anyway.
>>65458772
Hepburn is so fucking dull looking
>>65462329
5.0 - /pol/
4.5 - /k/
4.0 - /vg/
3.5 - /tv/
3.0 - /ck/
2.5 - /v/
2.0 - /b/
1.5 - /lgbt/
1.0 - /s4s/
0.5 - /mu/
ftfy
>>65462466
Unless your skull was cracked when you were an infant, you cannot claim that there is anything redeemable about /tv/.
>>65462494
Fuck off. /pol/ was made to contain you faggots.
>>65462498
/tv/ has some of the funniest shitposting on this website and actually has regular threads about patrician films, unlike /co/ or /a/
>>65462532
Yeah, calling everyone either a cuck sure is funny.
5 = perfect (I have never once found a 5 star album)
4 = great
3 = good
2 = average/okay
1 = no.
I'll never understand how some people can have hundreds of 5's but I guess that must mean I'm a miserable person
>>65462532
>funniest shitposting
please stay on /tv/
>>65462548
that is a /pol/ joke, /tv/ shitposting is stuff like jesse killing the dog, rust shooting at god, baneposting, vinceposting, e.t.c.
>>65462299
>>65462483
These are the only one that make sense.
You're all digging too deep into "le musical critic" meme. You don't even have criteras other than likind it or not. It's only a 2 dimension spectrum. The positive side has a few levels of likehood.
Anyone rating albums he didn't like other than "I didn't like it" is a disturbed idiot
>>65458772
cate blanchette is hot af
>>65462483
passionate cannot be shit?
>>65462695
Meant to be "very great / I'm passionate about it / borderline amazing", so no, it can't be shit (to me, ofc)
>>65462313
>you're an autist
That's a bold diagnosis. Do you have a degree?
>>65462146
Wrong, attributing words to values is the opposite of autism.
>>65458772
1
good
2
bad
thats it
>Having le so quirky XD!11!1 comparisons instead of a clear description of what your rating means
Absolute cancer.
https://rateyourmusic.com/stats/filmstats?user=USERNAME
What is your average rating?
Mine is 2.52 stars
>>65462519
>Fuck off. /pol/ was made to contain you faggots.
Almost every single board is a containiment board
As some example /tg/ board was created because of the extreme amount of threads about the game warhammer 40k that appeared on the board /b/
>>65459072
>music
>subjective
Whoops buddy, you made a little mistake in your post.
>>65459027
>misato is a five and not asuka
your waifu a shit
>>65462494
>0.5 - /mu/
I hope you arent saying that /mu/ is the worse board ever, because this is far from true
5.0 - lobster
4.5 - steak
4.0 - al dente pasta / high quality fish
3.5 - pizza / bacon & eggs
3.0 - tacos / pork chops
2.5 - burger / chicken tenders
2.0 - hot dog / low quality fish
1.5 - subway
1.0 - mcdonald's
0.5 - carl's jr / hardee's
Roast me /mu/
>>65465534
get a load of this guy's awful taste
2.5 - listenable
>>65465637
>Subway that low
>Pork chops below pizza
When will this meme end?
>>65465650
>he still doesn't see the supremacy of glorious asuka
report to the euthanasia clinic for your daily inspection.
I like to give my favorites room to breathe. Lots of very good albums in 2.5.
>>65458997
> nearly flawless
> given a perfect score
>>65465909
if it were a 100 point scale, anything that is 95 and above would become a 5/5
it doesn't have to be a 100/100 to be a 5/5/, just 95/100
>>65465679
Subways is just a shitty overpriced sandwich.
