[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why do today's bands look so boring?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 4
File: bored.jpg (20 KB, 306x306) Image search: [Google]
bored.jpg
20 KB, 306x306
>look up pictures of band
>it's 4 guys with long hair and serious faces wearing jeans, t-shirts, and maybe a hoodie or denim jacket
Why do today's bands all look so boring?

Not to sound like a wrong generation-fag but bands from the 60s-80s put at least a bit of effort into looking interesting, different, catchy, etc. I'm not saying they should make a gimmick out of their appearances but seriously, you're a rockstar, you can get away with wearing anything. A lot of good bands only got the public's attention because they dressed cool / different.

Death Grips, Sufjan, and DIIV are some of the exceptions to this. They look interesting without being gimmicky or taking the focus off of their music
>>
dumb frogposter
>>
retarded frogposter
>>
>>65372864
DIIV look like faggots how is that interesting?
>>
>>65372864
>liking gimmicks
dumb frogposter
>>
Artic Monkeys look cool
>>
>>65372947
Wrong. Faggots tend to wear tight clothes and keep themselves clean cut
>>65373071
At times
>>
>>65372864
old bands look cool to you because you're seeing decades-old fashion and style, it's interesting to see it now, after so much change
>>
File: 250.jpg (519 KB, 1865x1243) Image search: [Google]
250.jpg
519 KB, 1865x1243
>>65372864
Cole is the best dressed musician today.
>>
Still my fav pic of an artist/band.
>>
>>65373689
Fucking hell, he has clothes that fit him. I assumed he was a midget.
>>
>>65372864
dumb frogposter. Why does it matter what a band looks like? So long as the music is good who gives a shit
>>
File: 1415261275092.jpg (538 KB, 1280x1920) Image search: [Google]
1415261275092.jpg
538 KB, 1280x1920
Literally anytime anyone does anything different with their appearance it's called a gimmick and people argue endlessly over what the point of them dressing differently is. I can see why people would want to avoid that issue.
Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 4

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.