[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What exactly is it that makes this album a 'psychedelic'
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
File: Love_-_forever_changes.jpg (29 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
Love_-_forever_changes.jpg
29 KB, 500x500
What exactly is it that makes this album a 'psychedelic' classic?

I just can't hear it. Not for the life of me. It's not bad, don't get me wrong, but there's not a single sustained note, no reverb, no delay, no vibrato guitar licks, no organs or even anything resembling or coming close to sounding like a psychedelic experience.

Is it just me, or is there some kind of weird need to label everything put out in the late sixties as psychedelic?
>>
>>65305384
it's great and i love it, therefore it's psychedelic.
>>
>>65305384
Anything experimental in the 60s gets labeled psychedelic for some reason
>>
>drug-influenced paranoid lyrics
>rooted in folk
>~exotic~ flavors like the horn part in the opener
>>
>>65305384
Literally just add reverbs and anything can be describe as psychedelic
>>
>>65305384
psychedelic is a buzzword you can apply to anything without rhyme or reason
>>
>>65305384
Its not very good

I had no idea this was considered a classic
>>
File: Love_-_forever_changes.jpg (119 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
Love_-_forever_changes.jpg
119 KB, 500x500
What exactly is it that makes this album a 'psychedelic' classic?

I just can't hear it. Not for the life of me. It's not bad, don't get me wrong, but there's not a single sustained note, no reverb, no delay, no vibrato guitar licks, no organs or even anything resembling or coming close to sounding like a psychedelic experience.

Is it just me, or is there some kind of weird need to label everything put out in the late sixties as psychedelic?
>>
>>65305881
Oh great

I've become copypasta
>>
>>65305384
it's baroque pop
>>
the lyrics and electric guitar are psychedelic
Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.