Is /mu/ excited for the new Stone Roses single?
>>64802822
No. Why are they back?
>>64802845
money
If by excited you mean scared shitless then yes i'm very excited
>>64802936
same, i-it can't be any worse than second coming r-right??
>>64802984
Second Coming wasn't that bad.
No because now people I don't like are pretending to like them and pretending that knowing who the Stone Roses are means they are 'really in to music' :(
>>64803174
it's so hard being a britfag right anon?
stone roses are the british nickelback
>>64802936
This year is being so fucking frightening.
>new Radiohead
I was scared as fuck
>new Slowdive
Scared as fuck
>New swans
Scared as fuck
And now the fucking stone roses. Why cant we have nice things all the time...
>>64803174
Serves you right for being a dullard who unironically likes the stone roses in the first place.
>>64803191
In many ways
:(
Where did I say I liked them? Oh yeah, I didn't. Good one mate
:(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30c9A57YXFs
I love their first album and squires guitar playing
but check out what a fucking brick brain this twat is
>>64803262
>>64803218
Intended for you
:(
I Wanna Be Adored is their only good song prove me wrong u can't cunt
>>64803214
Why would Radiohead and Swans scare you? Both of those bands still put out great material.
>>64803384
Yeah but Tkol while still good, was kinda underwhelming for me, the same goes for Tmmb and Amok.
And in swans case, i fucking Loved Tbk, and gira releasing 2 minutes excerpts of 20minutes long song is starting to piss me off and worrying me
>>64803359
Not even their best song
>>64802822
FUCKING YES
>>64803359
but i kept listening to the album
>and then got the second
breaking into heaven is pretty god tier
>>64802984
Second Coming is great, though.
>>64803359
Don't Stop
>>64804127
yeah gotta agree with you there, great tune
>>64802984
>Second Coming wasn't a pretty good album
How is this meme still going after twenty years?
>>64802822
I'm hoping for the best but expecting disappointment.
>>64802822
So where do we get it? What time is it being released?
>>64802822
Can't wait for 'I Wanna Be Retired', lads. Think they'll use backup girl singers to back up that senescent croak?
>>64804470
maybe he'll just whisper like he did for fools gold and most of second coming
>>64803174
The Stone Roses have always been big
Very excited but also hesitant. I don't think the band's ability to write a good song has gone away, but as we're all aware, Ian's voice is even shittier than it was when they recorded the first album.
the key will be in how well they're able to hide that. They were able to do it back in the day, so if they can do it again, then we might still have hope
>>64803214
IKR I'm shitting myself if slowdive is bad may as well volunteer to go to Mars.
>>64804949
>the key will be in how well they're able to hide that.
have no fear anon
>>64805065
they're not that desperate, I think
Buzzing my cunt off. Hoping for another Away Day anthem that would rival "Made of Stone", "I Wanna Be Adored" or "She Bangs The Drum"
prime stone roses were fucking good m8s
second coming is weak, few good choons
hopefully they don't shit the bed
Ian's vocals were shit by 1990 and gone by '95, I don't even know if I'll be able to sit through the whole track.
Surprised /mu/ isn't kicking up more of a fuss over this. It's he first single in 21 years ffs
>>64802984
>2016
>still not liking second coming
>>64802822
About time. I remember in 2011 they were talking about making a new album.
>>64806178
Stone Roses aren't very well known outside the UK.
plus you can't rely on /mu/ for anything. I made a thread about Ian hinting about the new album a while back and everyone just shrugged it off because they know Ian's voice is shit now
No. I watched them live in 2012 and Ian voice has pretty much gone to shit.
Making an album after all this time? What could they possible add new?
>>64806353
good jangle pop like they've always done is what they could add
>>64806353
You say that as if his live vocals were good to begin with.
They could maybe do a good job, but I'm pretty apprehensive about it. I think it's more likely they'll put out a polished NME-indie sounding record instead of something in the same vain as their self-titled. Then again, they've been trying to record something for about 4 or 5 years now, so for them to actually release something makes me hopeful it's because they've finally made something they like.
1 HOUR TILL RELEASE
>>64802822
Im eagerly awaiting but very apprehensive. It depends how in touch they are with modern music and if they have any modern influences incorporated into their own sound - I think the most critically acclaimed long running bands keep their ideas fresh. Out of touch bands rehashing ideas just doesn't work.
>>64804972
Nah, I doubt Neil will put out something bad.
>>64806353
Oh jeez, got tickets for the Etihad in a few weeks
>>64806349
I see your point, but I imagine that after the USA, a significant number of posters on 4chan would be Britfags
>>64806625
You'll have a great time anyway. Roses gigs are populated with drunk dads singing louder than the band.
>>64802822
If they pick up where they left off with fools gold / one love it could be pretty cool. Second coming was ok but not what was exciting about the band.
In reality Im expecting a generic rock song with good enough production to hide Ian's bad singing. It will be received well enough but just a complete flash in the pan.
How can they recreate that debut's magic when out of the game for so long?
>>64806625
>>64806353
Even the sound at their infamous "Spike Island" was supposed to be shit for alot. The wind supposedly took it
>>64805566
Listen to their Glasgow Green gig from 1990. Ian could sing if he wanted to.
Can you all answer me something. I love their debut but I don't understand this whole "baggy" sound that takes influence from dance music. Maybe a little in Fools Gold.
Did it more stem from a scene in Manchester at the time than the actual music? And a crossover of fans that enjoyed Stones Roses etc. as well as dance music...
plz halp.
>>64806686
>>64806742
Cheers lads, seen Ian Brown a fewfew times at Glastonbury over the years. I remember FEAR from 05 being a let-down in terms of vocals. Just gonna get fucking rekt on the train up and let rip
>>64802822
New Oasis single when?
On a serious note, I think this will spawn a whole bunch of Madchester and Britpop bands to release new tracks/albums .. Prepare for someone like Ocean Colour Scene to come out of the woodwork.
excited but nervous
>>64807276
>Ocean Colour Scene
nobody ever gave a real shit about bands of this kind
>>64802984
Meme opinion.
Second Coming is easily on par with the first album.
>>64807398
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skb6lVS35Jk
What about some of these bands :^)
About to be played on Rado 1 in a matter of moments
>>64807631
>Radio 1
dropped
>produced by brian epworth
fucking dropped
>>64807656
Radio 6 not radio 1 i heard aswell as radio X
wtf was that
>>64807711
Got Radio 6 on.. haven't heard it mentioned yet.
meh.
>>64807711
fuck I missed it cos i tuned into radio 6 you fucker!
well that was shite
>>64803174
You unironically, literally, just have to listen to two albums and some singles, m8
>>64802822
nout special, best part of the song was Squire shredding it up
will sound good live next month tho, can't wait for that
jesus that was terrible
>>64807795
we had our jimmys rustled bro. It was radio 1. I caught the last 10 seconds
Theyre dropping it again right now tho
>>64807711
>>64807799
I got rused too.
BRAVO TRIPFAG
>>64806601
>It depends how in touch they are with modern music
Why would you want them to take from modern music? I agree I don't want them to just re-hash what they've already done but they don't need to incorporate electronic influences or some shit to sound good.
>>64807799
its not on for another 2 minutes i'm listening to it on radio x
>radio 1
fucking shite
if i have to listen to fm radio, i just listen to rinse or the pirates lmfao
6 music is pretty quality tho but thats digital
>>64807711
>Radio 6 not radio 1
Hey fucking die I missed it because of you
>>64807895
http://www.radiox.co.uk/radio/
ONE MIN
Literally sounded like Oasis
that was... really underwhelming
It's not bad, just bland
>>64807919
ITS JUST STARTED
It sounds just like the wave of bands that came after the Stone Roses
>>64802822
It's a nice little Rock tune. Not great or extremely relevant but not bad either. I dig it.
Well that was about as meh as I expected it to be.
Ian doesn't sound as shit as I thought it would but he's still drowned in reverb to make him sound decent.
Well, I missed it
>>64807978
you didn't miss much
>>64807955
Yeah spot on mate. It'll be forgotten by all except Stones fans pretty quickly. It should sound pretty cool live (if the fans learn to sing it louder than Ian can)
The lyrics are not only incredibly repetitive, but also fucking hippie shite.
link la
Don't really "get it". Just sounds like a Stone Roses b-side.
>>64807955
Objectively this. It's not a BAD song. Just generic and nothing new. But it was fun and catchy just like Stone Roses always were. It had a more straightforward Rock sound too. Somehwere between Self Titled and Second Coming.
>>64807795
>>64807799
>>64807887
>>64807917
Sorry guise blame BBC
>will be released at 20:00
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-36275003
>BBC 6 Music, Virgin Radio and X have all said they will play the record as soon as it is released.
>>64808014
>Don't really "get it".
It's a Pop Rock song. What's there to "get"?
>>64807890
Well for example, Bowie's last album he said even Death Grips influenced him. Now it didn't sound like Death Grips but because it was clear he took influences from current sounds his ideas stayed fresh.
Literally sounded like the same shit they always do. If you're a fan but act like this song is shit then you're just being a hypocrite.
As soon as i seen the length of the song at 3 mins on spotify i knew it wold be shite
>>64808109
Just like She Bangs the Drums and Sugar Spun Sister are shit?
>>64808104
Sounded fuck all like their first album
It's okay, but it sounds more like The Seahorses than the Roses
>>64808104
>songs that sound similar are the same quality
wow what a shit opinion
Its on spotify now bro's for those who havent heard it
>>64808154
Fuck you got me
>>64808089
The article also said he was to release a song called "Somewhere" which was influenced by Boards Of Canada which was never actually released
So what do we have here? A completely unnecessary Pixies-like comeback?
Seems like nobody can pull out Swans anymore.
>>64808178
Sound the same not similar. If you think otherwise you're just fooling yourself. Stone Roses are shit anyway so it shouldn't matter
>>64808189
Dont worry bowie said hes still working on that track it will be out soon i'd say.
>>64808222
Yep, it's a band that should just stick to reunion shows to give their fans a chance to see them again and young fans to see them for the first time and leave it at that
LITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGYLITERALLY DODGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSUuRZR-9hA
>>64802936
Same. I'm hopeful but I doubt they can pull off a my bloody valentine level reunion album.
>>64808281
also sounded a fair bit like round are way by oasis
Holy shit the song was upbeat and light hearted! SHIIIITTTT!!! PURE SHIT!!!!!
>>64808312
Thats my baseline for a long awaited reunion too.
I guess they couldn't go far wrong though, as long as Kevin Shields wrote more beautiful swirling guitars it was going to be good,
>>64808377
Also Blue Oyster Cult https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClQcUyhoxTg
Pretty boring, nothing disgustingly bad but pretty poor. decent solo
>>64802822
The epitome of "meh". I'll still buy a new album though. At least it wasn't embarrassing.
Pretty shit
>>64802822
Fuck you all I liked it. It's catchy as fuck. Will probably be one of the lesser songs on the album though. It's a modern She Bangs the Drums. Here's hoping they release a more serious song next.
>>64803214
>new Slowdive
WHAT
link anywhere?
Someone give me a link ffs I'm not buying a fucking spotify account for this.
literally terrible
they've lost it
>>64808726
>a modern she bangs the drums
It literally bares no resemblance beyond being the same band and similar song length. I would tell you to kill yourself, but I don't want you to kill yourself, I just want you to think about what you've said, reevaluate it, and if you still believe it is true, fine. But just know, JUST KNOW, that I vehemently disagree with you sir.
>>64808804
Just go to Radio 1 or 6's website, click "listen now" and scroll it back to just after/before 8 o'clock
>>64808804
dis
is
s
it's fucking nice, fuck you all
nice to hear proper reverb again
LINK WHEN?
I'm not a Spotify pleb
fucking terrible
>>64808830
>It literally bares no resemblance beyond being the same band and similar song length.
It's an upbeat pop rock song.
>>64808780
don't see why you blanked the name out, tweets are publicly searchable
>>64808995
Millions of songs are upbeat and pop rock, it doesn't mean as they are in any way indicative of similarity. I see where your coming from, but following your logic it is a 'modern (insert nearly any stone roses song)' which is a pointless statement. Not that I want to waste my time arguing with someone I'll never meet on such a trivial issue
>>64808830
Jangly Pop Rock song with a super catchy melody. It Rocks a bit harder than She Bangs the Drums and it's not as dreamy. But yeah, as far as making a comparison to a past Stone Roses song goes I'd say SBTD is the right choice.
>>64809170
>as far as making a comparison to a past Stone Roses song goes I'd say SBTD is the right choice.
That's just it though, you can't compare this to a past SR song.
wow, how awful
>>64802822
just listened to it, it's a bit shit
It's up on SoulSeek.
>>64809170
catchy? not at all, imo
>>64809150
>but following your logic it is a 'modern (insert nearly any stone roses song)'
No just She Bangs the Drums specifically.
>>64809351
2deep4u
>>64807398
I legitimately liked some of the acoustic songs on their b-sides collection.
>>64809448
Oasis were great, their first, second and fourth albums were top notch.
>>64802822
Well it's better than anything on Second Coming. It's still a bit too "rawk" compared to their self titled album but it's better. Hopefully the full album is closer to their older style and this is just a song they made to be a single.
>>64802822
them playing that reunion in manchester was probably the best weekend of my life tbqh
great fucking show.
>>64809578
>better than Love Spreads
>better than Ten Storey Love Song
>>64809570
But I was talking about Ocean Colour Scene. Defend them, if you dare.
(For real, though, the acoustic version of The Circle is pretty OK)
>>64809728
oh lol, I didn't read the rest of the post I thought you were calling Oasis OCS
LINK:
https://mega.nz/#!cMAk2KBR!IOtZEQjJA7uuGpFOjVZEHZdBQbYwhEQHzC_fjqqpjew
Why does this band attract so many fucking idiots tho
>>64809595
i missed out first time, can't wait to see them next month
>>64809873
>reading the comment section
>ever
>>64808804
>buying a spotify account
Is this a meme? It's free, anon.
>>64809873
proper laughing at "you miserable bastards"
>>64809873
fucking cringe
>>64809873
I'd say the lyrics are the worst aspect of this new track. It's far too upbeat even for them
>all for one one for all
>if we all join hands
>>64808154
Those are filler shit, though.
>>64802822
Besides Ian Brown's voice it doesn't feel like a Stone Roses song.
>>64803204
I know this is b8 but i'm triggered as fuck
>>64809578
>better than breaking into heaven
>better than begging you
>better than tightrope
>better than the foz
>>64810107
>Stone Roses debut
>having any filler
>implying it isn't a perfect album
Leave
>>64810236
It's not.
>>64809688
>>64810217
Literally nothing is good about that album
But I'll admit this song is even worse so there's that.
>>64810236
>Don't Stop
>not blantant filler
>>64810264
You got memed, kid.
>>64810283
Elizabeth My Dear is more filler, they didn't even write it.
>>64810260
>Elizabeth My Dear
Ok almost perfect
hmmm
>>64810283
Don't Stop > Waterfall
>>64809791
can someone verify?
>>64810392
Oh I just HATE when bands have a set type of music!!! I like REAL bands like Arctic Monkeys, Oasis and Coldplay who really diversify
I like it.
>>64810392
I just love how people can literally say anything no matter how wrong they are and still get people to agree with them just because they like the song too.
>>64809570
also their third and last album.
No because less than 1% of this board is from Manchester and less than 0.5% of this board is old enough to give a shit.
>>64810539
I am from Manchester and I despise this band and the whole madchester scene
>>64810539
Considering the song has been discussed for over an hour now did you really think this was an appropriate response?
>>64810452
its legit. idk if it has anything attached to it, but it has the song.
>>64810568
>wew
edgy as fuck
>>64810410
This.
>Waterfall
Cheesy pop anthem.
>Don't Stop
Psychedelic madchester bliss.
>>64810539
Im in the US and freaking out
>>64810452
It's on youtube m8 just get it there
>>64810283
What the fuck? It's one of the standouts.
Guitar riff is totally Hatful of Hollow. Lyrics are abysmal but it's a serviceable rocker, about as good as they can be in 2016.
>>64810568
I feel so bad for you anon, do they get played every single day? I'm from Birmingham and couldn't imagine how much I'd hate my life if I didn't like ELO and Black Sabbath
>>64810669
It's great, but I can totally see how taking the previous track, reversing it, and just adding new drums and vocals would be filler.
>>64810674
how do you say this is hatful of hollow? no jangle, not enough arpeggiated picking, no Rickenbacker
>>64810568
Also from Manchester. I get shit for saying Oasis are wank.
Wow. This is really really lackluster. I'm a big fan of their music, especially their older stuff, but this is just bland and boring. It really has no redeeming qualities and doesn't sound like them at all, in a bad way.
>None of the subtlely amazing drumming Reni is known for, just generic backing metronome frequency fluff
>Lyrics are awful and repetitive
>Vocal melody was completely unremarkable and uninspired
>Vocal performance was also in that vein
>Guitar playing sounds like somebody doing a bad imitation of his own style
>Guitar mixed/produce especially bad, even relative to the overall bad production
>Generic tone and playing throughout
>Mani is drowned in the mix
>of what I can actually hear of his playing, it also seems like really safe and boring typical rock bass
>songwriting is completely generic
>makes exactly 0 movements and practically blends together aside from a short guitar solo with a phaser added that does nothing for me
Honestly about what I expected, but I was pretty hopeful after how good they sounded at some of their rehearsals for the last tour, I was hoping for at least Reni, Mani, and John to still have it, but it doesn't seem so given this track.
>>64802822
that was groovy af
>>64807276
ocean colour scene is the evil
It has that big, anthemic sound that would translate well to a stadium. They'll probably open their shows with it.
Very mediocre though. The vocals are flat and the guitar is mixed way too loud. Reni is on point as ever. Based Reni.
