Post suggestions for changes and I will ignore them most likely.
>>64753015
Sheikh to the Future needs to be in the top.
Still seven decades ahead of its time.
Noise rock and harsh noice being in the same tier is preety dumb desu
>>64754122
hampus is a pretty strong believer in that both are talentless garbage for idiots.
>>64754152
you're so cool xd
>>64753015
>no broken beat
>no modern/deep funk
>no Garifuna
>no Ripsaw music
>>64754241
I didn't say I agreed with him.
>>64754152
a lot of harsh noise has stochastic qualities though
and people like xenakis are somehow both
What is some of the best martial industrial?
>>64754264
broken beat's there great reading skills
>>64754342
>thinking I bothered even opening it
>>64754465
You bothered enough to post twice in this thread.
>>64754528
*thrice
You are more pathetic now than you were three years ago. What are you doing?
>>64754264
Well it'll all be type 0 anyway innit
>>64754613
Studying and being way too busy to listen to music.
>>64753015
Where's djent and slam
>>64754684
djent is litterally the first one
>>64753015
I don't see third stream anywhere? Maybe I'm overlooking it, but imo should be type-III
>>64754822
Surprisingly correct.
>>64754863
Also I'd argue that sonorism is more fitted for type IV, because it shows more similarities with eg serialism and isn't so detached from most stuff as the other things in type V are.
>>64754921
Can you fail?
>>64754942
What do you mean?
>>64753015
doom metal, tahitian polyphony, georgian polyphony, fado, plainsong, chamber pop (unless you class that under (the presumably more restrictive) baroque pop), native american traditional musics, mongolian throat singing (or any turkic-mongolian music), slack-key guitar, musical theatre, grime, footwork, trap, ethio-jazz, rock in opposition.
why is ebm higher than ragtime?
>>64754921
Now you're overstepping your boundaries son.
>>64754995
You been drinking brew for breakfast?
>>64755028
by yodeling do you mean country yodeling or the alpine kind? or just any yodeling?
close harmony too. and piedmont blues. and ECM jazz (unless you consider it "smooth")
>>64755028
Hm
>>64755053
I also do not know what you are referring to with this, but I have been drinking, yes.
>>64755076
m8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwm8fT3llP0
>>64755112
Cool, thanks.
>>64755105
because of crap like alien ant farm and deftones
>>64753015
>Danger Music
wtf is that
>>64755105
Because there isn't a type -1?
>>64755067
>>64755015
Some of this will be taken into consideration.
>>64755155
>nu metal was experimental
>>64754449
just listened to no input for the first time
surprisingly, really really pleasant textures
>>64753015
Why doesn't this have a list of related bands?
>>64755250
Limp fucking Bizkit vs John Cage
Seriously?
>>64755167
i figured some of it would be. could you answer either of my questions?
>>64755250
I mean Jimi Hendrix is mainstream..
>>64755254
it's a fun genre to toy with if you have the gear yerself.
>>64755205
definitely more experimental than thrash metal, arguably more experimental than death metal
it doesnt seem to be based on "degrees" of experimentation anyways, otherwise all traditional musics would be type 0, but rather on popular appeal, kinda loosely of course
>>64755262
guess you can just google
>>64755302
No.
>>64755146
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS5ZkPXkto0
Or GG allin but only if you are at one of his shows
>>64755250
This - it was relatively experimental in the context of where it emerged from. Nobody sounded like Korn back in the day - they completely ran their careers into the ground by not evolving to nurture the eccentricities on their first couple of records... but they had a unique sound that got copied endlessly. We got little tastes of how far Deftones would stretch their sound from the start, Incubus' first album has a bunch of odd riffs, funky hip hop breaks and trippy interludes, Slipknot have dabbled in pretty intense dark soundscapes (515, Iowa, Gently, Scissors) System of a Down have an undeniably completely unique sound whether you like them or not, and genre cross-pollination in general was abound in that era - to mixed results obviously.
Nobody's pretending this stuff holds a candle to the achievements and breakthroughs of the avant-garde and experimental music of the past, no shit. But people have always seemed to look back upon the entire era of nu metal and just rememebered the overblown weirdo aesthetic and the disingenuous fake angst a lot of the fucking awful copycat bands went for. But it was a time where a lot of playful tinkering went on, and I've always thought it was a far more interesting time in mainstream rock than certainly anything in the 80's or after its decline in the early '00s.
why were nu metal guy's posts deleted?
>>64753015
What would be the level of that tonefield sub-genre created by /mu/?
https://wavelength2.bandcamp.com/
