>radiohead ditch guitars
>BTFO
>deathgrips adopt guitars
>band of the decade
boring score.
he's so biased towards death grips it's not even funny. of course all critics are biased but still, there was no doubt that he was gonna suck that albums dick.
still haven't heard that radiohead and i dunno know if i plan to. not into ballads all that much.
RADIOHEAD BTFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>64750266
for a boring album
AMSP confirmed shit
>>64750289
yeah he's biased towards the music he likes fuck that guy
I don't know why but this just happened
>>64750289
Yeah critics are usually biased when reviewing music they like, crazy right?
HIS WHOLE CAREER IS BASED ON GIVING DG A 10
He doesn't need to impress the older mature RH audience
>>64750360
>older mature RH audience
>>64750360
>the older mature RH audience
>RH audience
>older
>mature
>>64750417
>>64750423
As opposed to the 15 year olds who listen to DG, yes.
>>64750417
>>64750423
Children's responses as expected by dg fans :)
>>64750360
>older mature RH audience
The score is fine, but the review is so goddamn boring.
>>64750360
Wew lad
>>64750352
what year is it over there? why does your youtube have that player
welp
>>64750252
8 is fair, it's what I'd give it. It's a fantastic album, but it's not even in radiohead's top 5 albums
>radiohead ditch guitars
how?
>>64750541
same, though I'd honestly give the new DG a 7/10. Wasn't as crazy for it as Anthony was
>>64750588
bp is a 6/10. it's really not great.
>>64750585
its mostly pianos and strings
>>64750614
Songs like a Ring a Bell and Hot Head made me bump the score to that number, but thats just me
>>64750588
I agree spot on actually. I did like the new Death Grips LP but it's nothing mindblowing.
But I personally thought TPTB (as a whole) is the highlight of their discog so far
>>64750530
meh, it's just my laptop. It's quite old
>>64750616
ts folky as fuck, the present tense, desert island, ful stop, the numbers. (the best tracks th)
>>64750360
>the older mature RH audience
havent laughed that hard in a while
>>64750670
"it's nothing mindblowing"
thats what i said lol
Honestly hope they release a track that is as mindblowing as Inanimate Sensation in the future
>enjoy both these albums immensely
>never watched a music review video in my life
>don't care about the demographic that I share a fan base with
>don't care about /mu/'s opinion of what I like
>see this thread
>>64750694
>>64750541
kid a 10
amnesiac 9
ok computer 9
amsp 8
in rainbows 8
httt 7.5
tkol 7
bends 6
tloph 5
its totally top 5
>>64750736
ennjoy watching /mu/ n a nuthsell
guitars sound better than synth shit
prove me wrong
>>64750776
prove yourself right
>>64750724
Same, although part of me wants them to either further explore the quite lo-fi, abrasive sampling of ExMil, or the heavily electronic stuff on Govt. Plates
>>64750757
In Rainbows 10
Amnesiac 10
Kid A 9
AMSP 9
OK Computer 8
The King of Limbs 8
The Bends 7
HTTT 6
Pablo Honey 5
>>64750417
>>64750423
>>64750446
>>64750467
>>64750499
14yr old classy gentleman rh fans actually think theyre older than dg fans
lmao
>>64750757
it's tied for top 3 for me actually. i'm really happy with it - a real achievement for a band who's been around this long.
also, i like it more with every listen.
>>64750773
It's sad and hilarious
>n-no your fan base is children
>nuh-uh yours!
>>64750757
>tloph
kek, although I think the Bends is an 8. It's just a really detailed alt-rock album propelling itself miles away from anything in the britpop scene save a pulp record
>>64750252
>8/10
>decent
IGN ruined /10 ratings
>>64750724
fuck man Inanimate Sensation is literally 10/10
>>64750807
on /mu/ perhaps they're the same age, but come on man. rh have been around almost 25 years, of course their fanbase is generally skewed older.
>>64750833
You don't get it. "decent" is the level within the score. There could be a "decent" 5 or 6. Each score has 3 levels: light, decent, and strong.
>>64750833
8/10's for him arent decent
he rates things like this:
light [number]
decent [number]
strong [number]
so if he gives something a strong 8, he likes it more than something he'd given a decent 8 or light 8 etc...
>>64750833
It means decent 8 and strong 9, it may be as well light 8 and decent 9.
>>64750833
decent 8 does not mean an 8 is decent, of course an 8 is really good, the decent means like a middling 8. strong 9 means like very good 9. jeez man. >>>/v/
>>64750802
>>64750831
The bends is a fine album but i don't see how everyone puts it over HTTT, songs like high and dry are just awful
Light 8 = 7.5/10
Decent 8 = 8.0/10
Strong 8 = 8.5/10
>>64750833
A light 8 is like an 8.0, a decent 8 is like an 8.5, and a strong 8 is like an 8.9. So this is a really good score for him.
>>64750921
>Light 8 = 7.5/10
you fucking retard. 7.5 is decent 7 you dumb fucking idiot
see>>64750946
>>64750252
8's a good score for AMSP. 9 for BP is way too high, that albums like 7/7.5. Fantano is Death Grips fanny boi.
>>64750912
HTTT has some nice self-contained songs, and some really fantastic imagery, but it just seems a little stale compared to the LPs coming before and after it
>>64750776
Aphex Twin
Holy fuck all this analysis on this faggot's ranking system
How do you possibly care enough to take it this seriously?
>>64750359
Hi Anthony.
>>64751017
Fantano is literally God.
>>64750833
decent 8 = 8.5/10
>>64750757
>>64750802
HTTT 10
Kid A 10
In rainbows 9.5
AMSP 9
OKC 9
Amnesiac 9
TKOL 8
Bends 5
PH 2
Disappointingly safe score. A 6 or 7 would have been a shitstorm, and a 9 would be good for meme AOTY arguments.
>fantano
>>64750833
a "decent 8" just means it's average for that rating
>>64750946
so he gave BP and 9.5/9.9, thats too damn high.
>>64751088
Yeah i wish he'd rate albums in a way that would be memeable instead of accurate
>>64751130
what do you think is worthy of that score that has come out recently?
>>64751137
Yes. Music reviews aren't meant to be taken seriously; they're only good for meme potential.
>>64751069
nah. his reviews might as well be a wikipedia entry but sprinkled with some of his trademark meme-y buzzwords. plus, he never reviews anything terribly interesting or obscure. his curation sucks compared to tmt or the quietus or even p4k, even if their reviews are bad too.
can someone take a video of themselves pissing on a picture of progemon?
>>64751137
>BP
>9/10
>""accurate"""
>not ""memeable""
hmm okay den
>>64751160
The Seer. Shaking the Habitual, You're dead .
Nothing last year really.
>>64751174
lmaooo shut the fuck up nerd bitch
>>64751219
no u, dick-rider
keep having your boring taste validated by a viral /mu/tard
>>64750252
ewe realize that his comments - if those are actually his comments - are consistent, right? and if ewe're implying that a rock band abandoning electroacoustic instruments is revolutionary, i suggest googling kraftwerk.
>>64750252
>Radiohead ditch guitars
No they didn't... Have you even listened to the album? Desert Island Disk, Identikit, The Numbers, and Present Tense all have guitars.
also since when is an 8 "BTFO"? It means it'll make it onto his loved list.
>>64750328
"no"
>>64751380
Ah yes this is what that anon was talking about when he mentioned RH's mature audience
Haven't theyve had guitars again since Hail to the Thief?
tfw you're hoping that pitchfork gives it a 9.4+ so that your opinion that it's Radiohead's second best album is vindicated
>>64751504
DW, anon, I'll back you up even if P4k don't (though for me it's their 3rd best)
>>64750252
only thing i'm upset about is that the /mu/ guy character didn't make an appearance in either video. such bullshit. he should have at least been in the radiohead video. he was in the TKOL review video, and considering /mu/ and radiohead have a symbiotic relationship, it would have fit for him to return to this video.
Does he describe classic albums as 'light 10s' and 'decent 10s'?
>>64750757
>>64750802
>>64751087
shit taste
pablo honey 3/10
the bends 10/10
ok computer 9/10
kid A 8.5/10
amnesiac 6.5/10
hail to the thief 7/10
in rainbows 7/10
the king of limbs 5/10
a moon shaped pool 6.5/10
>>64751613
lol
>>64751602
He doesn't score classic albums
>>64751573
he's serious now. he's streamlining his reviews
>>64750252
The Bends > Ok Computer > literal garbage > Kid A > the rest of their discography.
>>64751613
good one
>>64750736
you seem to care enough to tell the board about it
>>64751573
I feel a decent to strong 9 on this comment. Its really fucking good.
>>64750360
Wew Lad
>>64751613
Welcome to baitville, population (you)
>>64750360
His whole career is based on spamming himself here
>>64750757
Kid A 10
In Rainbows 10
OK Computer
AMSP 9
Amnesiac 8
The Bends 8
TKOL 7
Pablo Honey 6
Hail To The Thief 6
>>64750252
Why the fuck are you people talking like he panned radiohead when he gave it an 8/10
>>64752241
Because he just gave the new DG album a 9/10 and the fanboys need to compare everything
>>64752241
their career is over
>>64750252
BP > AMSP
>>64750757
>amnesiac 9
wut.
>>64750912
>songs like high and dry are just awful
uh. That's one of the best songs off the bends.
>>64750871
this
>>64750252
cuz thats the only thing that happened. Radiohead got boring and Death Grips kept being interesting.
>>64750252
He gave AMSP it an 8 because even though the music is well produced, it's too low energy.
If they did IR 2.0 he prob would've given it a 9.
Fantano is a hack.
He obviously likes black people more than white people
>>64750352
>Italian youtube
>Browser hasn't been updated in years
Sc...Scaruffi, is that you?
>>64752696
>death grips
>interesting
lol
>>64752428
Fuck no, it's poppy dogshit that wouldn't look out of place on an Imagine Dragons record.
where were you when craig meme-rap "fuck white people" jenkins wrote a glowing review of amsp?
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/radiohead-a-moon-shaped-pool-review?utm_source=noiseytwitterus
>>64751613
HA! man you suck
Fantano is just a guy who reviews music, idk why everyone cares about his opinion so much.
>>64752978
That's a good review.
He can be annoying as fuck but he's also a fair and candid reviewer at times. I remember he was one of the few that gave Mark Kozelek the benefit of the doubt and appraised Universal Themes on it's music only without bringing the controversy into it.
>>64751456
what are you even trying to say? That I'm immature for pointing out that OP is talking out of his ass?
>>64753260
that you're immature for taking this kind of shitposting so seriously. you have to be new
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dy6Ks-hQNg
>>64753434
Is this the new fantani????????
AMSP is so much better than BP its not even funny
radiohead fans are fucking nerds aren't they
i might just have to stop liking them goddamn it
>>64753639
nah he's worse.
he gave THE GOOD OLE DAYS a 4.5 or something
>>64753724
you're so fucking retarded it isn't even funny
>>64753786
Noice argument
>>64753724
I agree, but Fantano's taste has always skewed towards more aggressive and experimental music. That's fine, just his opinion. Personally I'm at a loss with BP and Death Grips in general. I find Kouhei Matsunaga's take on experimental hip-hop far more intriguing.
>>64753434
This guy looks like a faggot.
>>64750360
>>64753802
yeah its just as good as this one >>64753724
>>64753749
how do you mean? theres controversy whenever a new fantano review comes out. it's a weird phenomenon of this board.
>>64753434
>doesn't like Ful Stop
fuck this faggot so much
>>64750289
wait, one of his favorite bands releases a good album and he gives it a good review? what the fuck does he think he is doing?
Doesn't he understand he needs to have my taste in music to be a good critic?
>>64750289
Yeah he's so biased towards DG that he gave GP, FW and NOTM mediocre scores.
Two great album, two great scores. What's the controversy?
