>>itt we predict the rating pitchfork will give to amsp.
i'll go for 9.1
Damn this will be fucking hilarious when it gets a 6.7
>>64741491
9.5.
They loved BTW and Daydreaming and neither of those are even in the top 5 tracks on the album.
>>64741491
9.3
>Fantano
Strong 8-light 9
9.7
>>64741491
9.2
Just as you take my hand
Just as you write my number down
Just as the drinks arrive
8.9
Screenshot this post.
>>64741491
>If Thom Yorke was a black transgender
9.8
>What AMSP will get
9.1
It will be > 8 but not BNM
It's almost a shoe-in 9+ because of
>>64741522
on top of also giving True Love Waits BNT. Pitchfork fucking adores the record. I'm thinking a 9.6.
>getting excited for a shitty pitchfork rating
Plebs
Pitchfork - 9.5
Anthony - Decent 9
>>64741562
What's their criteria for a 10 these days anyway?
They seem to hand them out like candy to classic albums.
>>64741563
Excited? Nah, I just like guessing games.
You fucking idiots do this every time. You like an album because you hyped it, therefore you think Pitchfork will endorse it. One, it isn't very good and two, Radiohead aren't the kind of band 2016 would endorse.
>>64741579
They have criteria for these things? In any case a 10 actually isn't out of the question from them this time. Their discussion on it thus far has been absolutely glowing.
>>64741589
They gave BTW and TLW BNM.
Face it nigger, AMSP has 9+ written all over it.
>>64741563
its board culture bra
>>64741600
You're delusional if you think it'll get >9. That's absurd.
>>64741639
The only delusional one here is you.
>>64741639
I dunno man, P4K's been dickriding and dissecting this shit these past few days. Pretty safe to say they're into it.
>>64741639
I'm screenshotting this faggot
>>64741656
Go for it. You do this EVERY TIME.
Unless Thom Yorke dies they're not giving him a >9. You don't understand the way pitchfork works. It isn't "I think the album is good therefore they'll review it well". Culturally and socially the album isn't something they will get behind.
>>64741701
I'm going to screenshot you too, and I will make a thread and it will be very embarrassing and we're all going to laugh at you.
>>64741701
Except signs point to it being something they can get behind. They are 100% caught up in "NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM GUYS!!!!1!1!" hype.
>>64741733
Because the clicks will get them views without it being an endorsement.
>>64741768
Clicks sound like a cynical enough reason to slap a 9+ on it then. Besides, TKOL notwithstanding (and I think they rated that record honestly) Radiohead has a long history of being on Pitchfork's good side.
9.2, you know it to be true.
9.5
Fantano: Strong 8
It will absolutely be Pitchfork's next holy 10.
I reckon either 8.8 or 9.4.
Reckon we'll get the review tomorrow?
>>64741491
8.8
but it really deserves a 7.8
It will get a 10
Radiohead will have Memefork's number 1 album of the 90s, 00s, and 10s just wait and see
It won't be > 9.3
>>64742101
I hope it will get a 10, just to piss off /mu/
What do you think will be the next album to get a 9.6+? Reckon they'll give one this decade?
>>64742104
Dude, face it, it's better than IR.
>>64741491
9.2 BNM
in reality it deserves a 6.9 at most but it will never happen, that would be bad publicity for Pitchfork
>>64741491
guessing high 8s (8.8). they also gave BNT to james blake and did articles on him and he got 8.2, so clearly BNT on songs is not a predictor of anything beyond high 7s/low 8s. the album is great but not revelatory, and given the amount of hype they've given it it would be embarrassing for them to give lower than high 8s, but also embarrassing to give high 9s. mid-high 8s/low 9s is probably the safest route for them
9.1
screencap this
>>64741522
Idk dud, Views had two BNM tracks before they reviewed the album, and it didn't even get a 7/10. I mean, AMSP is clearly a better album in almost all regards than Views but still, two BNM tracks =/= BNM album or even >8.
It will get a very lukewarm score. If you recall, they hyped up Drake only to cut him down just in time for the review. They're garnering hype to gain traffic. Radiohead isnt the kind of band they're going to give an AOTY BNM to. It probably wont even get BNM to begin with.
>>64742635
They gave 10/10 to OKC and Kid A.
>>64741491
>8.4, too much water
>>64742654
You're acting like the Pitchfork that gave Kid A a 10 is the same Pitchfork operating now. You're just succumbing to wishful thinking. If you honestly think this is getting anywhere near a 10, you're delusional.
Burn the Witch sucks
>>64742429
AMSP has like four BNT though and it's significantly shorter than Views.
>>64742680
B-but Radiohead isn't muh memerappers
>>64741600
I mean, they gave drakes album two BNTs and then gave it a 6.8
>>64742680
It has 2, and one that didn't get a BNT
>All in all, Radiohead's new record is by really great, but they're all white and appropriating rock music, which was invented and perfected by black musicians and stolen by white people, much like a cultural imperialism, so we can't rate anything higher than Drake's Views.
>6.7
>>64742101
I think so too
9.8 imo
>>64742721
I can see a 7.2
>>64742693
What good is it having two BNTs if the rest is shit? Pitchfork handed out BNTs for AMSP that aren't even top 3, this is completely different.
>>64741600
Drake had 2 BNTs and his album got a 6.8.
>>64743313
Read this
>>64743260
BTW, Daydreaming and TLW aren't the best tracks on AMSP, the rest of the album is generally considered good, unlike Views.
>>64743331
That's exactly what I was talking about, anon.
>>64743313
The difference is this album is actually good
>>64741491
10.0 with 0.8-1.2 removed for it being a white male band
Decks Dark is GOAT. Does anyone agree?
>>64741701
the fuck are you even talking about, dude?
>>64743934
Hes right you know. Beyonce will get a higher score
