>>64690908
but that album came out 0.832316 picoseconds ago

File: Velvet_Underground_and_Nico.jpg (9 KB, 350x350) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 350x350

Please don't kill me

File: a5e4af3628f6c6c4ff640abe255f856d26e114b8[1].jpg (12 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]

12 KB, 300x300

Still a great album and I love it but god damn

>>64690754
Nope. It might be only glam rock, but its energy is still there. Its heritage is not so widespread in the US I'd say, but in UK it's still pretty relevant. Its sound remains somewhat unique.

File: pet sounds.jpg (411 KB, 723x705) Image search: [Google]

411 KB, 723x705

It's a fantastic album but it SCREAMS 60s.

File: image.jpg (14 KB, 125x112) Image search: [Google]

14 KB, 125x112

>>64691144
Are you retarded?

>>64690754
yea
>>64690908
lol
>>64691144
yea
>>64691192
lol no
>>64691247
yea
>>64691691
yea but i dont care. pet sounds is perfect

>>64691144
The only song that aged horribly was Being for the benefit of mr. Kite
But even then...

Lou Reeds entire solo discography

>>64690754
Nah

>>64690908
lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>64691144
No

>>64691192
I totally agree

>>64692459
Great contribution shitter

Any electronic album more than 20 years old

Any of Kraftwerks albums but fuck i love em anyway

>>64691192
>Severin! Severin!
Lol, it sounds so 1967.

File: Crosby-Stills-Nash.jpg (222 KB, 1024x1024) Image search: [Google]

222 KB, 1024x1024

This and anything with Stephen Stills attached to it.

>>64690754
Yes
>>64690908
Kys
>>64691144
Yes
>>64691192
Major kys
>>64691691
Sort of

>>64691691
no

>>64690754
haha, when milk ages too much it becomes cheese and this album is sure as hell cheesy!

File: 684010.jpg (17 KB, 399x388) Image search: [Google]

17 KB, 399x388

>>64690754
>>64690908
>>64691144
>>64691192
>>64691247
>>64691691
>>64692439
>>64692505
>>64694044
>music "ages"
GET OUT OF MY BOARD YOU FUCKING PLEBEIANS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: were_only_in_it_for_the_money.jpg (54 KB, 350x350) Image search: [Google]

54 KB, 350x350

great album but basically became irrelevant in less than 2 years

>>64694703
it does. but to imply that it makes the music somehow worse is plebeian as fuck

>>64691691
what the fuck?

>>64694764
complete opposite actually. it captured the entire era in a timeless capsule. it's a part of history, where as the albums it was making fun are now way more aged because they are unironically hippy dippy shit.

>>64694764
>>64695077
I mean really, the techniques he used with all the tape manipulations and crazy shit was so far ahead of it's time that the album sounds way more relevant today than back then from a composition perspective now that everyone is doing deconstructional shit all the time

Zappa is so fucking awesome

File: image.jpg (56 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]

56 KB, 500x500

sounds like aggression if aggression hadn't been discovered yet