rym // sonemic
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
rateyourmusic thread
https://rateyourmusic.com/~animeregrets
>>64631620
hi not gloomy adonis
sonemic when
>>64631686
april
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Aeroplane_of_LSD
>>64631620
great name
>>64631743
>negative rating
People still do that?
>>64631876
I really dont wanna bother categorizing things based on how much i dislike them
>>64631876
*positive
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Maogi
Hi.
>>64631958
ive always called it negative shut up
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Miss_Fortune
Need Modern Classical recommendations, specifically Spectralism.
>>64632139
Clepsydra; Astray
>>64632139
Why not listen to classical other than modern you pretentious twat
https://rateyourmusic.com/~closeitjohn this guy has the worst reviews ever
https://rateyourmusic.com/~CometOnABus
>>64632183
sal pls
>>64632151
Have already listened to it, Astray is one of my favorite works by Radulescu.
>>64632183
I have listened to enough of it to know it's not my thing.
When's Glitchwave dropping? I don't want beta, I'm not gonna work as their product tester for free.
>>64632213
>Sal is the only person that thinks classical music has more to offer than modern
>>64632242
How can you appreciate modern classical when you have no appreciation for previous eras... Classical is an objective art form and to say that Feldman is the pinnacle of it is a joke.
And no I'm not boldfaure, I just don't understand the modern classical circle-jerk with no actual love for actual classical music, people like l_s are guilty of it as well
>>64632312
I think previous eras are too tame, melodic and mellow for my tastes. I don't enjoy it, still knowing that, I listened to those eras' composers before listening to Modern Classical
>>64632312
I think people are purposefully listening stuff like electroacoustic, concrete, minimalism etc. for image reasons, actual classical music seems like "dad rock" to them now.
c'mon, everyone knows late classical / early romantic is the best era for classical music
>>64632139
iancu dumitrescu - medium II / cogito
No one even comes close to my taste don't even try
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Fanchus
>>64633092
but you just like mucore
hello
https://rateyourmusic.com/~IHateWeyden
>>64632312
>How can you appreciate modern classical when you have no appreciation for previous eras
if you wanna look at it historically, yeah sure but purely in terms of listening i dont see why thats so relevant
>objective art form
that sounds like bullshit
>>64632398
i dont think so, however i think image-consciousness is too demonized by some here, and i dont even really get why
h i
https://rateyourmusic.com/~74av
https://rateyourmusic.com/~74av
has anyone else noticed how formulaic boldfaure's reviews are? Take a pop album, and explain how it works or not based on how it does or doesn't live up to classical music standards, name dropping whoever's slightly relevant, of course. Then, give some completely insubstantial reviews of classical music to to prove you actually listen to it.
I don't want to hate on anyone, and I thought maybe he'd be cool because I want to get into a wider variety of classical, but god it drips with pretention and betrays no interesting knowledge or research
>>64633622
Seriously the best way to listen to classical music is just to jump directly in and listen to whatever. I started with Bach's cello and violin pieces then Chopin's piano stuff and onto other incredibly famous and acclaimed works.
>>64633669
sure, I agree. it's like everything else, listen to what you want to listen to. That said, there is something that tempts me to see who listens to classical music and is considered knowledgeable in this "social circle" and to compare myself
https://rateyourmusic.com/~randomforest
>>64633622
I noticed that clown on the James Blake album page
>he's no Frank Ocean, he's a REAL artist like Satie guise
https://rateyourmusic.com/~floatings
i think i'm just gonna stop smoking weed for good now cuz it makes me lazy as fuck (room's a mess and i can't remember how or why) and destroys my already-terrible impulse control. i feel brain damaged.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~NoveltyCondom
waiting for my comfycore list to hit at least 50 entries before going public, any reccs?
>>64633825
I like ur taste in harmony pop
>>64633825
Why did you delete your new acount?
>>64633942
i mean he did say he has terrible impulse control
This guy deleted most of his metal ratings because of /mu/ abusive behaviour. Are you guys proud?
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/puntugruhm/strm_h,ss.rd/metal
>>64633930
thx if you have any recommendations i'd appreciate it
>>64633942
well harkening back to my "shit impulse control" i made that account high as shit and i'm not conscious about RYM enough to care about owning two accounts and doing different things with them. i hardly care about my main one enough as it is
>>64634000
what a pussy lol
~boldfaure
this is great
James Blake is great
everything's great
>>64632389
>I think previous eras are too tame, melodic and mellow for my tastes.
And you're too shallow and immature for that music.
>>64632398
Sounds about right.
>>64634063
>boldfaure calling people shallow and immature
hot lel
>>64633622
Most people don't know much about politics, but we say "I'll have to research this more. With more experience and research I could form a well nuanced opinion on this issue." Naturally, we don't always end up doing this. Trump doesn't know politics either, but he goes with it. it's the general difference between politicians and citizens, and even moreso the difference between tastemakers and other RYMers because if tastemakers actually had anything worth saying, they'd be writing about music anywhere else
>>64634063
you are such a funny guy. i remember when you were so nice to everyone here and even though that, you got mocked for your terrible high-school-essay-written reviews. then you got very, very mad and started insulting everyone and everyone's taste and rym in general. hehe.
>>64634115
How am I wrong?
>>64634138
>i remember when you were so nice to everyone here and even though that, you got mocked for your terrible high-school-essay-written reviews.
I'm still nice to most people on RYM, unless they're the pretentious teenagers that I've *always* hated.
Are you one of them? Is that why you're offended/triggered by me or something?
I have no quarrel with the vast majority of RYMers or ones ITT.
>>64634151
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying you're a hypocrite who has no right to call anyone shallow and immature, seeing as you haven't actually made a single post or statement, here or on RYM that wasn't a shining example of both these traits
>>64634151
Because ultimately it comes down to what you're used to listening to and have claimed alliance with. It's neither shallowness, posing, nor the music being "tame, melodic and mellow".
>>64634174
no, i am one of these who mocked your shitty reviews, dummy. also funny that you say you hate "pretentious teenagers" since you're clearly one of them.
>>64634182
>seeing as you haven't actually made a single post or statement, here or on RYM that wasn't a shining example of both these traits
Aight.
>>64634214
what is this image other than a blatant appeal to popularity?
i didnt remember physics house band being so good but it kinda kicks ass
https://rateyourmusic.com/~vApOrzfuok
>>64634199
Classical music isn't something like punk or hip hop, it's all been written with an artistic rigor.
>>64634214
>LOOK AT ALL THIS ATTENTION I GOT
lmao, you decided to respond to my accusation by making your most shallow and immature post yet
are you a comedy act?
>>64634252
I think you misunderstood my post. I agree, but don't see how that's relevant
>>64634240
>implying I'm popular
People like my reviews. So calling them shallow just seems like, your opinion man.
>>64634214
point me to a review that isn't shallow or immature
thank you
>>64634275
you have 16 "likes" at your most popular review. sure people like your reviews ;)
>I just wanna lie you flat down on the ground - just flop down on top of you like a big pancake and just talk.
What did he mean by this?
>>64634245
I respect those 5 stars. Double Nickels is such a good album
I'm gonna recommend you listen to Tower Of Power's self-titled album and Home Alone by TotorRo
>>64634313
hey cool tower of power s/t is a p decent funk album
havent heard that other one tho so i'll give it a try
thanks
>>64634290
I could link you at least ten of them but to start:
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/ep/aphex_twin/computer_controlled_acoustic_instruments_pt2/
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/julius_eastman/unjust_malaise/
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/brian_eno/the_ship/
>>64634302
...yeah. So what's your point?
The ones for TAW, The Epic, UT, and Daydreaming are currently still the highest rated reviews for those releases.
Listen you're making me have to do some stupid ego boosting, which I don't need. If you want to talk classical music, let me know.
anybody got the t_j hammer picture?
>>64634290
the liturgy one is p decent even if he spent too long babbling about barely related classical composers to make a very simple point. but yeah anyone who gets that band cant be that bad
>>64634354
>you're MAKING me ego boost
>>64634354
>you're making me have to do some stupid ego boosting
but he's not forcing you to write those "reviews"? (read: look at me namedrop folks)
>>64633825
You are brain damaged
>>64634394
>>64634401
this thread isn't about me
and a casual RYM account I make
I'm here because of that classical comment earlier
want to discuss that? let's drop the dumb drama
>>64634354
>https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/julius_eastman/unjust_malaise/
Please tell me you're not serious. Your review is somehow even worse than "but I won't".
>>64634354
>Julius Eastman isn't a bad composer. He's not great, and he's not awful. The problem comes from the mistake by others to consider him revolutionary, which couldn't be further from the truth. The only thing in Eastman's music that is particularly edgy or new are the titles.
>not shallow
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Thaddeus
>>64634214
I don't even know who you are but this post sucked so much that I've decided you're an asshole. Sorry. :(
>>64634457
he's correct.
If you want to discuss music, I'm here.
Not interested in your shallow drama shit though.
desu it's not that bouldfaure's reviews are any worse than anyone else's, but that to think of anything on rym as impressive in the slightest bit is pathetic and arrogant. you are literally just telling other people how much you liked music. if you "rise to the top" and are anything but silence about it, it's pretty embarrassing.
I read the liner notes to a charles ives cd I had yesterday, because I was bored. three pages of the cd booklet, and I learned so much and I felt I wanted to listen to the music again right away! You know who it was by?
Exactly.
>>64634474
I never said he was wrong
I also never said he was right
>>64634498
ok bud, just run away from arguments you can't win
and you call us immature lmao
i'm glad i posted in this thread before the drama
>>64634438
how about you leave instead? you don't add anything constructive
https://rateyourmusic.com/~HotOpinions
>>64634342
It's a very charismatic and dynamic math rock album. I think you'll dig how it plays with sound level and textures
https://rateyourmusic.com/~friklaz
>>64634509
~boldfaure here
I don't and never have taken RYM seriously.
that's a lie that people on here pretend to believe so they can try and "take me down" from the high roost they think I'm on
but seriously, I don't care about it
https://rateyourmusic.com/~MintyPepps
>>64634519
>>64634524
>are calling me shallow and immature
>ignored my points about classical music to personally attack
I R O N Y
R
O
N
Y
>>64634556
for someone who doesn't care about it, you sure spend a lot of time insulting and condescending towards people that have views you don't agree with~
>>64634592
>you sure spend a lot of time insulting and condescending towards people that have views you don't agree with~
give me an example
>>64634556
I have to say I do get a sense of superiority from your reviews and profile that I find annoying. I shouldn't make such a big deal about it; as you say, it's aside the point. BUT, I feel you intend to incite some reaction from people by acting pretentious, whether you truly are or not
Only saying it because I wish you'd stop, same with everyone else itt
>>64634617
dunno, how about every post you made in this thread?
>>64634640
point me to one.
>>64634624
>from your reviews
example?
>and profile
well the picture is because Weber was well-known as a music critic, and I like his music a great deal (Freischutz is a favorite opera of mine).
anything else?
Meh I just glanced at boldfaure's reviews and they seem pretty good to me. Not half as condescending as some other RYM'ers. Dunno why people in this thread seem to have an issue with him.
>>64634683
wasn't even thinking of that. The other dp you have though, for sure.
>>64634683
I'm sure you remember which posts were yours
and btw, if you can't see how your statements and reviews are blatantly pretentious and condescending, then you seriously have some form of aspergers, not using that term in a meme way
Der Freischütz is great btw, it was my introduction to music as more than just something that happened to be on the radio when I find myself in a car.
>>64634733
those other RYMers don't come to every thread to shitpost
>>64634775
>The other dp you have though, for sure.
dp? you mean the "chart" thing I have?
>>64634783
>I'm sure you remember which posts were yours
not which ones are pretentious or condescending.
> if you can't see how your statements and reviews are blatantly pretentious and condescending, then you seriously have some form of aspergers, not using that term in a meme way
not ruling it out, just would prefer to discuss specifics instead of just vaguely discussing a general air of pretension.
>it was my introduction to music as more than just something that happened to be on the radio when I find myself in a car.
nice!
>>64634851
I'd say straight up calling people immature and shallow is more than a vague "air", honestly.
I'll admit that it's a lot less blatant in your reviews, so perhaps the way we read those is influenced by the way you post on /mu/, because the only bouts of condescension in your reviews are the needless inpersonal attacks you include in them sometimes. those seem more like you have some personal grudge with certain people on RYM though and uh, that's none of my business but it doesn't seem like a good use of anyone's time.
>nice!
yeah I got the Kleiber version of it for christmas a long time ago and I can't say I've found a piece of music as theatrically striking as the wolf's glen scene on that.
I wish my german wasn't so scrappy
https://rateyourmusic.com/~EtInArcadiaEgo
Add me
>>64635059
nah, you're a lame
>>64635082
lol montie
>>64635028
>I'd say straight up calling people immature and shallow is more than a vague "air", honestly.
I disagree, I think it's fair to call people shallow if they show a real lack of a WANT to discover new music, new ideas.
>so perhaps the way we read those is influenced by the way you post on /mu/, because the only bouts of condescension in your reviews are the needless inpersonal attacks you include in them sometimes.
bear in mind /mu/ is shitpost-land
mainly because there's nothing of substance here 90% of the time lmao
also yeah my reviews sometimes targeted people, which is again because I don't take them very seriously (the reviews).
that being said two reasons I stopped
1) it's pointless irritation that doesn't solve much to be in a review
2) I couldn't publish anymore if I left those in
>>64635059
added
https://rateyourmusic.com/~happy_beany
>>64635140
>I think it's fair to call people shallow if they show a real lack of a WANT to discover new music, new ideas.
I'm not really arguing about whether it's fair or not as much as I am saying I feel it doesn't achieve anything other than irritating everyone involved. Surely there's more constructive ways to deal with something like this. I know this is /mu/ but I want to retain a bit of that naivety
>bear in mind /mu/ is shitpost-land
yeah I wasn't about to forget, especially considering the majority of my replies to you, especially at the start of this were blatant shitposting.
and yeah I agree that taking RYM reviews seriously is a silly thing to do, if you want to review seriously, RYM is not the place to do so.
did they outright tell you not to?
>>64634733
t. boldfaure
what did he mean by this?
>>64632139
cornelius cardew
vagn holmboe
poul ruders
>>64635266
>did they outright tell you not to?
well I got my publishing revoked, and I messaged the mods/admins about it and they said I violated the review policy lmao
so I had to delete a lot of my shitposty one line reviews
>>64635059
>https://rateyourmusic.com/~EtInArcadiaEgo
>positive rating scale
>posuer
>5s include solo violin improv, radigue, ashley
lol ill pass
thought it couldnt get any worse then i checked your film 5s and whudda you know la region centrale.
your embarassing
>>64631732
its already past april buddy
>>64635458
not as embarrassing as your spelling in this post
>>64635458
>le poseur xD
>I listen to real music like Radiohead!
>>64635513
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cneMyE_OxeU
>>64635574
if you are into violins this is really good though
>>64635574
pretty good not cringe at all
>>64635574
it's breaking the conventions of what is perceived as normal music andandandandnalalalelleleleueueueeuablabalbalbalabalbalbabalbalbalablabalbalablablablabalbalablabalabalbalablablabalbal
>>64635486
>the joke
>>64635598
this guy said it for me
The Punk meta-genre just got approved.
What's your opinion on this?
Personally, I dislike that a lot. I really dislike Miklak's top genre structure. Should have left all punk under rock.
Be prepared though, he wants to propose alternative/indie as the next top genre. Yes, just like that.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~noff
>>64631876
It's the best way to rate stuff, really. Both for the user and the community.
>>64635574
Why is this supposed to be good though? It's so fucking lazy. Although I will say I appreciate some of the violin textures, unmusical and effortless as they are.
>>64635642
it's not about "enjoying" it, you close-minded retard. it's about the possibilities this album discovers (not saying that a lot of AntiWarhol clones don't actually care about violins and just pretend to like it, btw.)
>>64635747
>it's about the possibilities this album discovers
Which are?
What did this album do that Russolo didn't do?
>>64635719
why do you like bad music?
>>64635642
People like this are so fucking annoying.
>>64635722
This has actually picked up a little bit! She needs to play more frequently though.
>>64635756
why are you talking about Russolo? this has nothing to do with noise. oh my gawd. this discovers the possibilities of violin.
>>64635770
I like almost all kinds of music. It's just that my favorite kind of music is usually energetic, anxious, and happy. Therefore, not necessarily bad.
Even then, liking bad music is alright as long as you don't consider the bad music you like to be necessarily good.
>>64635832
>oh my gawd. this discovers the possibilities of violin
See you and >>64635598 and >>64635624 are all wrong because this shit was done by Xenakis years before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKDIQSyR4G0
>>64635330
ahahah what
i thought he had commented that on that berkovsky account, but notebooks?
>>64635911
oh, i see, you are not capable of understanding. it doesn't matter, just, please, could you stop hating it?
>>64635996
Will you admit that you were wrong and it does nothing new?
>>64635911
I wasn't defending that piece of shit though
>>64635976
yeah, it was posted on notebooks
>>64636002
>>64635836
>liking bad music is alright as long as you don't consider the bad music you like to be necessarily good.
what the fuck is wrong with you
>>64635719
I voted for it, but only because I think there should be a way to tag electronic punk stuff like Suicide and Atari Teenage Riot as punk without putting them on the rock charts, since they're not rock
>>64636002
>literal pedophile
>hates 4chan
Retard. He probably posts into "loli threads" on /b/ all day long. I fucking hate him.
>>64635836
...but you consider Sing to God to be the most album ever
>>64636050
>>literal pedophile
Wat
>>64636088
yes. Just like Kishinev and probably TheHorbgorbler as well.
>>64636120
>TheHorbgorbler
really? go on. i can really see it though hes 'off'
>>64636120
Explain.
>>64636139
>>64636181
For example that list of Kishinev (which got probably deleted since I can't find it) he gave a star ("like") to.
>>64636244
what list?
>>64636252
Something like "cute lolis" or stuff like that. Sorry, can't remember exactly. It's probably in the archive though.
>>64636025
What's exactly wrong with that statement?
>>64636040
Suicide is rock though, just very minimalist and with different instrumentation (individual songs from the album are tagged as krautrock and rockabilly or something too). Atari Teenage not sure, last time I listened to them was two years ago, but I don't think adding a punk rock secondary is a bad idea.
>>64636054
Depends. It's my favorite, but it's probably not on the top 100 of bests ever. Songs like Manhoo and Fiery Gun Hand are some of the best songs ever though. Best rock album ever is TVU&N
>>64636244
>>64636252
https://rateyourmusic.com/list/Kishinev/favorite_anime_babes_from_youtube_nightcore_mixes/
wew lad, time to fap t b h
>>64636252
this one?
https://rateyourmusic.com/list/Kishinev/favorite_anime_babes_from_youtube_nightcore_mixes/
>>64636307
>>64636321
lol, I'm blind. Yeah.
>>64636278
>Manhoo
dude that sounds exactly like a song from blur around the same time how is that one of the best songs ever though
Your shtick got old big time avant-math god
>>64636364
"blur are shite" was never anything more than a meme
>>64636397
Who says I hate either artists
>>64636440
then what's the point of drawing that comparison
>>64636467
because in no world is a song that sounds like blur one of the best songs of all time
>>64636482
the entirety of 13 disagrees with you
>>64636364
Because of the unique and original chorus. For the whole song only the first half of the chorus gets played, until reaching the ending of the song, where the second half of the chorus gets played. 5hats one of my favorite moments in music ever too.
This Heat's Horizontal Hold is also one of the best songs ever for a similar but kind of opposite reason. That one isn't in my top 100 like Manhoo, but top 1000 instead.
The Blur comparison is irrelevant.
I don't care if you are trolling.
>>64636572
>For the whole song only the first half of the chorus gets played, until reaching the ending of the song, where the second half of the chorus gets played
then is the "second half" really a chorus, rather than a bridge or something?
>>64636572
That's called a bridge
to consider what would be a standard run of the mill britpop song from the 90s if it became a mega hit means you have lackluster taste in music
i'm sure you would tell me to "listen to more music and branch out, it's okay if you still sometimes listen to your old music just don't consider it good" if i said that blur's sunday sunday or supergrass's mansize rooster were two of the best songs ever because its just the same thing
having ""good" "taste"" is lame anyways
who are some cool users with cool ""bad" "taste""?
im thinking like
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Rauschgift
https://rateyourmusic.com/~herb_guy
>>64636617
>>64636721
Yes, I know what a bridge is, but this works as the chorus.
>>64636721
If you had your reasons to consider them the best, then sure. Maybe I wouldn't agree with you, but if you were being honest then your candidates for best songs should be considered.
Manhoo doesn't sound like a run of the mill britpop song. It's way too layered to be one, for example.
>>64636807
No_
>>64636855
who is that in the pic? .///.
>>64637078
hunter hunt-hendrix
>>64637078
i don't know why i have that pic on my pc
i think she used to be my phone's background
((google tells me she's lydia graham))
>>64636880
>Manhoo doesn't sound like a run of the mill britpop song. It's way too layered to be one
sunday sunday and mansize rooster were pretty layered from what i remember
>>64635574
True patricians know that the superior violin/viola improvisation album is Mary Oliver's Witchfiddle.
>>64637078
https://vimeo.com/87982998
>>64637171
good idea
>>64637324
thank u
she's very pretty...
>>64637324
https://vimeo.com/49643883
my profile: https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/various_artists_f2/%E5%A1%8A%E3%83%95%E3%82%A9%E3%83%AB%E3%83%86%E3%83%83%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A2%E9%AD%82__katamari_fortissimo_damacy_/
https://rateyourmusic.com/~landscape_suicide
Need some modern classical recs
Can't decide who's worse:
embarrassing, beige, ill-informed, self-congratulatory DUDE FEMALE POP SINGERS LMAO users
>mrmungbean
>marsbars
>limedibagels
>sol_fuc
>mookid
Or empty, pronoun-fetishising PC Music appropriators
>nonochanel
>boundaryfuss
>thehorbgorbler
>thecrystalbird
>ukrayf
>>64637728
Why not listen to classical other than modern you pretentious twat
Can someone rec me good music from 2014 i have very few >3.5s from that year
>>64637747
first one if you forget about horb
>>64637747
sol_fuc and mookid are better than the other three by far, though
>>64637769
Cadu Tenório & Márcio Bulk - Banquete
John Hébert Trio - Floodstage
Ondness - Filho do dono
Angles 9 - Injuries
Kris Davis Trio - Waiting for You to Grow
ななひら - ばーさす!
John Escreet - Sound, Space and Structures
>>64637769
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/goreshit/mlsfaw/
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/%EF%BD%87%EF%BD%81%EF%BD%8D%EF%BD%85%EF%BD%93%EF%BD%88%EF%BD%81%EF%BD%92%EF%BD%8B%E2%84%A2/shark_%E3%83%95%E3%83%AD%E3%83%BC%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%83%B3_%E3%82%B0%E3%81%B5%E3%82%8F%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A8/
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/machine_girl/wlfgrl/
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/something_anorak/tiny_island/
>>64637828
>ななひら - ばーさす!
yes
>>64637747
theyre all cool
>>64637747
whats ur rym
>>64638068
the people who talk the most shit in these threads are 16-17 year old chileans/mexicans with ~300 ratings (all /mu/core) who never post their profiles because they would be underage banned
>this entire account
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Brainmole
>>64637747
the second clique isn't even a thing anymore
>>64638102
why would you look at other peoples accounts
>rateyourmusic thread
you mean tumblr thread?
literally "look at me" the thread, you're all cringe.
>>64634550
>https://rateyourmusic.com/~friklaz
>the beatles
kek
>>64638209
t. 16-17 year old chilean/mexican with ~300 ratings (all /mu/core) who never posts his profile because he would be underage banned
>>64638097
Been using the site on/off since I was 15 (10 years ago) and I'm from the UK, but thanks for trying
>>64637920
literally "no"
>>64638251
I'm literally 22 so you have to kill yourself now
>>64638263
>>64638296
yeah and i'm the queen of sheba
>>64638243
what is the point of this post exactly
>>64638251
so you're literally proving to me that this thread is "look at me, I enjoy tumblr", right?
you LITERALLY just said that this thread is about seeking approval
>>64638209
>tumblr meme
are you 13?
>>64638334
>the beatles
you're a pleb
please approve of me
>>64637828
Thank you, this is exactly what I'm looking for
>>64637858
The fuck is this nerd shit
Looks like a good time though ngl
>>64638351
so you're literally admitting to being a third world child? because i know you are
>>64638251
It's just that some people don't care for seeking approval by anonymous users on a taiwanese anime board.
>>64638412
>nerd shit
it's 2014 music i like ;_ ;
>>64638414
nice /b/ meme! oh by the way i live in cali hahaha
>>64638396
fuck off newtrip
>>64638420
you wouldn't be reading these threads if you weren't petty. the only reason you don't post your profile before gossiping about random users is because you're 16
>>64638460
okay i'm going
bye
can we like, ban everyone that gives a 5 star to Guernica?
>>64638471
i used to have that game
https://rateyourmusic.com/~badluck
>>64633092
>brujeria 0.5/5
mah hidrocálido
>>64633458
why is that anime not smiling?
>>64638461
hahahaha why would I post my profile
that's like my shit
kill yourself
>>64638484
>high level of musicianship
>well composed songs
>unique and talented singer
>original style
>BUT IT'S JAPANESE SO IT MUST BE RYMEME SHIT
kys
>>64638484
whats that?
>>64638501
nice
it looks like fun
>>64638461
>i'm tumblr approval seeking 13 year old
>>64638484
>>64638540
>i was born and raised in Chile, which is where i currently reside.
>>64638531
Calm down it's lot like you're getting banned for 5ing it anon :/
>>64638378
thinking the beatles are plebeian is one of the easiest entry level contrarian opinions you can have, literally unacceptable unless you're in week 1 of starting to listen to music
i'm guessing you're new?
>>64638461
Or maybe because they want to maintain their nice guy image on RYM and not be connected to /mu/ shittalking, duh.
>>64638554
/b/ memes haha good oine
>>64638567
naw give him some credit
it' more like 3 months
>>64638592
i don't browse /b/ because i'm not a child, so i'm not sure what you're talking about.
>>64638594
fuck off newtrip
jesus, why are you trying so hard to seek approval by anonymous users...
>>64638531
What's to say that it isn't all of those?
>unique
>original
no
>>64638615
he's clearly really young and doesn't know when to stop talking/posting, give him a break
>>64638612
>not being childish
yeah youre a child
>>64637750
"I listen to real classical! Mozart, Beethoven, Bach, the list goes on!"
>>64638615
a-anon pls b naicu
;_ ;
ITT: tumblr
approval/attention seeking, the thread
>>64638638
hey look, i can do it too:
>yes
>>64638687
You think you're smart
>>64638680
now tell me whats generally wrong with that
>>64638701
you need to be liquidated
hey guys
will you look at my music tumblr page ?? xDDD
>>64638743
you need to be liquidated
>>64632398
This. People listen to Can, hear that they were taught by this really important guy called Stockhausen, download Kontakte and boom now you are a patrician at the top of that chart of the most difficult genres.
>>64638665
You listen to classical like <insert obscure baroque Flemish composer here>, right?
>>64638795
tumblr is cool
want me to post mine?
>>64637858
>https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/goreshit/mlsfaw/
>Goreshit sampled the NHK ni youkoso ED again.
That show has a great OST, should've picked another song.
That song is cool but the
>>64638396
are you 13?
>>64638743
lmao
I've been spamming this exact sentence in various threads on various boards, and here you, using it verbatim because you have literally nothing to say. You're a bovine, adolescent spastic. Drown yourself.
>>64638843
never seen or read
>>64638850
and a half
>>64638880
your fedora is on way too tight, it's cutting off blood flow to your brain
>>64638880
dude who cares lmao
Why does almost everything on this site have a 3.x rating?
Why can't I see the unweighted average too?
>>64638880
oh hey look it's the guy who wants everyone to drown!
>>64638843
>That song is cool but the
ost is varied enough for more samples*
>>64638885
watch it senpai, it's a really good show.
>>64638953
oh hey look it's that guy who wants everyone to be liquidated!
>>64638964
maybe soon
i hear the manga is better though
>>64638932
>meme
"ha"
yeah, you're waste
>>64638938
you are terrible
>>64638953
honestly, fuck off sal
>>64639006
yeah yeah
Really now what's even the point of these threads
I used to post my profile here but recently it got way too toxic
>>64639006
you literally live in south america
>>64639047
liquidated
>>64639043
drama and pointless bickering
>>64639043
thank sal and the handful of children with inferiority complexes
>>64639090
liquidated
>>64639098
you need to be liquidated, and then sal needs to be drowned in the liquid.
So a thought on solo violin music by polly bradfield:
it IS pretty stupid imo to defend it for doing something revolutionary and having historical importance (it didn't and doesn't), or for its textures (squeak) (although that's a little more valid, the tape hiss is pretty beautiful and the violin is ALWAYS a pretty instrument, even though the weird tape echo sucks. but I digress). Somehow it's really captivating in its composition and form. maybe it's not much better describing something in abstract terms, but it sounds like a cry for help by some wounded dying soul, and it draws you in out of sympathy. it makes you confront your own mortality by watching someone die. and it makes you consider the 'life' of the instrument the violin itself. that one dismissive review that said it sounded like the violin was being tortured was actually fairly on point, except for the fact that it wasn't a cruel endeavor; in fact it's very sympathetic to have something so unappealing and crippled end up sad and profound enough to elicit the listener's sympathy. The main problem is it sounded like the thing was dead after the first part... I didn't know what to do with the second two. it's not like a death rattle has stanzas.
>>64631636
nobody likes you man
>>64639127
go away go get liquidated
>>64639134
tru, tru...
