>thinks music is quantifiable
>thinks saying "it's a 7/10" means anything
what's the obsession in current culture to rate things? a friend of mine recently described a social experience as a "5/10 experience" and said that watching an acclaimed movie would probably be at least a "7/10 experience" and therefore more worth it. obviously this is flawed, there are many differences in what it means to watch a good movie alone, and socializing. the positives/negatives aren't quantifiable. the same goes with music. what's the obsession with numbers for things so much more complicated?
>>64561256
I agree with you anon. I don't like the notion of "utility" and that enjoyment should be graded and constrained into a numeral scale. It takes away from the magic of the experience. You also have good taste in girls.
>>64561256
numbers should always follow a detailed review of the music
the numbers are for dumb people who can't read and for people who want to rank music by quality
>>64561256
4/10 post
>>64561256
That girl's tits are a 10/10
>>64561256
It's true that things can be qualitatively different, but I disagree that you can't compare them because of this. I can definitively say that I would rather hear a cool song for the first time than eat a really good sandwich, for instance.
I can say I enjoyed one thing more than another, because what I'm scoring isn't the thing itself, but my enjoyment of the thing.
>>64561256
where is her ass
>>64561256
>>64561324
>>64561469
Quanfitication is inherent to thinking, you idiots. Every time you choose one album over another when you pick your next listen, you are it x/10 such that for for each other album xn x > xn.
>>64561324
>big tits
>good taste
>>64561546
>you are it
*you rate it
>>64561546
>you are it
*you are lit
lmao
>>64561535
This anon knows what's up
>>64561546
I think this is true. the systems most people use to rate things are inherently flawed by your example though, because that's not how most of us rate things (at least I don't).
for example, after a hard days work I really enjoy a RYM 6/10 album to relax, whilst I on a lazy day will listen to my RYM 10/10 album and just let it soak in. are you proposing that an album rating therefore is relative to your mood? that my favourite album, a RYM 10/10, is lower than RYM 6/10 on a day on which I prefer a RYM 6/10? while it's a working system, that's not how music is rated. if you're referring to the my original post, I suppose he could've been working within your system - that creates a whole other problem about how there's no defined rating system and therefore it means nothing. as long as the system is undefined, it's completely pointless and counterproductive
>>64561256
Who is this splooge scrooge?
>>64561546
I don't like the tone there, fellow. You can use ordinal utility without cardinal. Assigning numbers to art is wrong.
Tits > Ass
>>64561546
Not at all. I just look through my library, see something I'm in the mood for, and play it. Not much thought or decision making goes into it, it's just whatever I happen to see or whatever I have a specific impulse to hear.
>>64561527
backproblems/10
>>64562200
cute picture and admirable digits palerino
>>64561256
who is this semen demon?
>>64562750
Cuntfacica Niggers
>>64562778
I doubt that is her real name.
>>64561780
whos the cummy mummy??
>>64561887
>>64562750
I'll just leave this here:
https://imgur.com/a/AnNmd
>>64562910
>>64562750
>>64561887
Sol Sandvik
She's got an Instagram account.
>>64563077
You the real MVP.
>>64561324
>good taste
>ass looks like my floorboards
>>64563248
Dem titties tho.
>>64563328
I'd rather flat tits with big ass than vice versa.
>>64563355
nigger detected
>>64563466
Ooga booga Visions was good
>>64563077
my nigga :'^)
>>64563355
agree
ass > tits
