https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI2oS2hoL0k

Haven't listened, nor do I intend to

>>64552671
Why

>>64552610

Its breddy gud

>>64552610
jazz puritans hate them because jazz plebs enjoy them
it's pretty good regardless, just wear a supreme hat while you listen to it if you want those toronto teen vibes to infiltrate your soul
i'm really interested to see what they do with their next stuff but bringing in a sax player into their rotation brings them a few steps back

>>64552922
I agree with most of this. They're not for jazz purists, but the music is usually enjoyable. The pianist especially is quite good. Why do you say this about sax player?

>>64553132
because III was a step forward because they started incorporating electronic influences into their act
if they pick up a sax player then it might be convenient for live performances but it will influence them to do typical jazz stuff

>>64552610

It's pretty good.

The cover of Limit to your Love is amazing

>>64553796
They we're more electronic in their first album

Great stuff

>>64552922
BBNG is not supposed to be Jazz and you can enjoy both. ????

>>64552610
not good
not nearly as bad as III

>>64552687
Because he's super cool and obviously really busy

>>64552610
Good stuff. They never intended to call themselves a jazz band so I don't know why there's so much debate over it. Plus it's not like jazz is supposed to be a super serious thing anyway. Why does this album trigger jazz purists so much?

>>64552922
Kek I've always gotten the same vibe from them that I get from people who wear supreme.

Good music regardless. BBNG2 has some good covers

>>64552610
my recent discovery. love what they're doing.