It's like every other ambient techno album but worse.
Is there any reason for the buss behind it outside it's influence?
Because it sounds amazing and unfortunately you don't like it, which is a shame.
There is literally nothing more to be said.
>>64373226
It's pretty good and was also one of the first ones to get big
It is incredibly overrated though, especially compared to his other stuff
>>64373269
it's pretty good but there isn't much atmosphere and it aged so much worse than similar albums.
I just don't understand the perspective of the people hyping it up to be anything but a stepping stone in the genre, what exactly is so good about it?
it's his best imo. i can't really stand breaks-based aphex tbqh.
>>64373348
have you heard selected ambient works II? It's similar but puts a way more interesting spin on the idea imo, also feels way more consistent.
>>64373396
its good, but i'm not really a big fan of ambient.
it's not a 10/10 but it does its job as an ambient album
the first half is perfect, and the rest atleast enjoyable
>>64373226
It sounds plastic as fuck.
RDJ would go on to top this, fortunately
>>64374199
the first half has the worst song on the album though, and it's drawn out to like eight minutes
>>64374199
i really don't consider it an ambient album honestly. like i know it's ambient techno but for me it's always leaned more to the techno side.
>>64373226
Except this is the best ambient techno album.
>>64374735
not while gas exists