Let's settle this once and for all..
The Beatles or Elvis?
Sacred Reich or Slayer?
>>64251978
Beatles
>>64251986
Slayer
>>64251986
What the fuck kind of shit is this?
SLAYER
..oh, and The Beatles.
>>64251978
Beatles
>>64251986
idk who sacred reich is
>>64251986
>>64252007
>>64252021
>>64252028
OP here and god dammit. I guess this is now a Beatles or Elvis and Sacred Reich or Slayer thread.
Optimus vs Megazord?
jesus and mary chain or cocteau twins?
>>64252096
Jesus and Mary Chain
>>64252070
optimus has decals so... megatron
>>64252096
beatles and FUCK cockteau twins
The beatles made literally hundreds of songs, ranging from amazing to mediocre. Elvis is more of a one hit wonder.
>>64252159
not wrong but that one hit became the official theme song of being a cool motherfucker: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpsUOOfb-vE
>>64251978
beatles
>>64252159
yeah, Elvis is more a phenomenon, he was managed as if he was a 1870s fairground act
I would choose Elvis though, he is like Jesus to me.
(beatles were a bunch of cunts except George)
>>64252423
All of The Beatles were cunts, including George. Elvis wasn't much better though.
>>64252501
no, Elvis was a good boy
>>64252501
>>64252423
and what exactly made them cunts?
>>64252800
they were so bitchy you wouldn't believe it. except George, he would have a fag.
John and Paul on their own, but in a room, forget it.
Paul was a brutalist
>>64252844
Bitchy? with all due respect, mate, I think they earned their right to be "bitchy"
Paul was a perfectionist, and it was actually his optimism that would contrast John's angst at times, or most of the time..
>>64251978
>The Beatles or Elvis?
Both gay and overrated. Especially Elvis, pictured here with long time secret boyfriend, Nick Adams
>>64252800
Each and everyone of them hit their wives at least once. John only gets crap about it now because he had the whole self-righteous image during his lifetime/became a martyr after his death and there's been a backlash.
>>64251978
Beatles for sure
>>64252906
unless the wives themselves came out and said it, I ain't buying it.
I've heard the same shit for years and it's always been some random word of mouth.
They have had countless rumors thrown out at them and will continue to forever.
>>64252946
Lennon's have.
So has Gandhi's. Because you can be the singular icon of peace, recognized and celebrated world-wide and still slap your wife around a bit. Apparently.
>>64252946
Cynthia wrote about it in her memoir and all of the biographies (including Paul's authorized biography, which mind you, says he only hit Linda once in a blind fit of rage) say it. At this point for John especially there are more sources making the case that he hit his wives than ones that don't.
>>64252970
No, but are you saying that nobody can redeem themselves after hitting someone?
I am not justifying the actions of striking a woman, or anyone, but it's not like either of them are famous for beating women!!
Radiohead or Swans
>>64253061
>>64252872
>ate, I think they earned their right to be "bitchy"
what? I've no idea what you mean.
Their music is a nightmare.
does that make sense?
their music is a quick trip through hell.
thanks.
:)
>>64251978
beatles
Roy Orbison>Elvis
Buddy Holly
Eddie Cochran
>>64253241
Oh, of course. Roy shits on Elvis, without having a heart attack.
