What's mu's opinion on this band?
never heard of em, at least post the fucking name of the band if youre gonna make these threads
Oasis ripoff
>>64157217
absolutely fantastic
though i can see why people would have a distaste for them
Literally who?
>>64157217
wiggers
Beach Boys had higher highs but lower lows.
>>64157217
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
>>64157313
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
A watered down pop version of Arctic Monkeys.
>>64157217
Wings were better.
>>64157338
Mate, The Beatles basically created mainstream music, there were no internationally so wide band and it influenced almost every band in 60's and after...
>>64157356
kek
>>64157338
Do you seriously believe that? Is it that hard for you to realize that just because a band is popular it can still be the greatest? Are you that much of a dumbass hipster?
>>64159212
another ignorant rock 'music' fan... psh..
when will you learn that JAZZ is the only true music... kids...
/mu/'s opinion is that they are some inferior version of Beach Boys, but /mu/ is wrong
>>64159212
it's Scruffy-pasta
being critical about popular icons is fine and all, but Scaruffi just comes off as a petty elitist so strongly when he talks about bands like the Beatles that it's pretty hard to take his opinions seriously - his top lists are not bad for finding less popular classic albums, but he's not very insightful as a commentator of popular culture (not to mention some of the terrible newer-than-70's-music that he's big on)
Some decent songs, but I'm not a fan. Their earlier stuff is awful.
