Now that the show is over, and we have jointly exercised our constitutional rights, we would like to leave you with one very important thought: Some time in the future, you may have the opportunity to serve as a juror in a censorship case or a so-called obscenity case. It would be wise to remember that the same people who would stop you from listening to Boards of Canada may be back next year to complain about a book, or even a TV program. If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think. Defend your constitutionally protected rights - no one else will do it for you. Thank you.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOORANGE
>>64067977
What did he mean by this?
>>64067979
What did he mean by this?
Kind of weird that was from a porn.
>>64067979
Yeeeeah, that's right
>>64067977
THE PAST INSIDE THE PRESENT
1
JUST FANTASIZE
>>64068034
>he
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LLLLLOOOOOVVVVVVVEEEEEE YYYYYYOOOOOOUUUUUUU
>yeah said in reverse sounds similar to hey
Gonna attempt a discussion on something that's bothered me for awhile:
In the original pressing of Music has the Right to Children, this would be what the listener hears as the outro. Do you think including the track "Happy Ending" at the end of the reissue devalues the significance and message of the sample?
>>64069607
happy cycling m8.
and nah
>>64067977
>then it follows that you can be told what to say or think
Is this supposed to be a bad thing?
>>64069607
Totally. Although Happy Cycling is the best track from that era, it doesn't really make sense in the context of the album. It's great on Peel Session. Should have been a single in the tradition of Windowlicker. I guess by appending it to MHtRtC they're echoing the kind of sequencing found on Hi Scores wherein the last track is an epic but I don't think the rest of MHtRtC deserves to be invalidated by its glory.
>>64071105
I agree completely
