>>64032454
Why do you care what is labelled /mu/core? What difference does it make?

>>64032454
It's a really good album t b h

threads get made about this album literally every day
>>64032454
>We recanted /mu/core status to albums like hospice and itcock because of the lack of discussion, why can't we do it for this one?
because it's already been discussed to death. say anything about the album and it has already been said 100 times over

the concept of /mu/core is obsolete in the year 2016

prove me wrong

Le I luv u Jesus Krist album

>>64032486
>threads get made about this album literally every day
okay find me a thread made on april 11th about this album

or february 16th

or march 27

>>64032520
what has made it obsolete?

>>64032480
this desu

Do you wear the latest /mu/core chart as a badge around uni or something?

>>64032529
if you can only name three days in the past two and a half months that we didn't made a thread about the album then it's mucore

This album will never stop being /mu/core.

>>64032454
It's already a part of musical Mt Olympus, regardless of /mu/ and the opinions of its userbase. That's why it's not terribly interesting to discuss; it's basically a prerequisite for posting on this board. That does not mean it's bad.

>>64032529
>what has made it obsolete?
The new awful, poptimist, rap-fueled, multicultural /mu/ culture.
Just look at those fags mocking people that listens to 'obscure' things.

>10th page
>12 replies
u was wrong OP
>>64032658
>mocking people that listens to 'obscure' things
first of all that stuff isn't obscure. second of all they're not mocking them for listening to obscure things, they're mocking people that think they have eclectic or refined taste because they listen to one or two albums from an experimental genre

>>64032454
It's a great album, why care about /mu/core?