>Weezer release a simple, catchy but derivative debut album of 90s pop rock with loud geetarz
>it's the best album of the 90s
>Oasis release a simple, catchy but derivative debut album of 90s pop rock with loud geetarz
>worst band of the 90s, kys etc
How can /mu/ possibly defend this? Is it literally just because Oasis' target demo is English football hooligans and Weezer's is American virgins?
le epic USA vs Yuro arguments as usual
same reason people hate on Blur
>>64023206
>all bands in a genre sound are equally as good as each other
nice meme
>weezer is not trash you should feel ashamed for liking
haha mem :DDD
>>64023221
Can you elaborate on what specifically makes Weezer's Blue Album higher quality music than Definitely Maybe though?
>>64023227
This thread is more about the Blue Album, I accept that Pinkerton was more creative and outside the box than both Oasis and standard Weezer fare.
>>64023206
For the simple reason that DM has some great tracks but also alot of filler
Blue is way more tight
European btw, not that it matters
>>64023206
Weezer had really good songs, Oasis had average songs
>>64023206
Weezer is trash
Oasis is god tier
How can Weezer even compete with songs like Slide Away, Champagne Supernova and Listen Up? Plus Noel Gallagher is one of the funniest humans alive.
Weezer fans kill yourselves
>geetah music
Both suck, who gives a fuck about your radio background ditties
>>64023288
"There has't been a great band since Kasabian and Arctic Monkeys"
Yeah, he's pretty funny
>>64023298
fuck off kill yourself waste of air contrarian
>>64023325
>if you don't like what I like you're a contrarian
Come up with an actual argument.
>>64023375
you need to kill yourself
>>64023383
I've had better music conversations with 10 year olds.
weezer is cute at least
>>64023240
Oasis were a ridiculously overproduced standard pop band and Weezer had more intricate melodies.
>>64023392
>I've had better music conversations with 10 year olds
What have you been saying to ten year olds about music?
best thread
>>64023240
>Can you elaborate on what specifically makes Weezer's Blue Album higher quality music than Definitely Maybe
Better songwriting, better production, better musicianship, better lyrics and vocals
>>64023422
>Better songwriting, better production, better musicianship, better lyrics and vocals
>>64023227
No one gives a shit about your opinion Aaron
>>64023430
It's true though
>>64023482
no it's not at all, use your ears. Weezer are terrible and boring as hell, typical American band. Oasis are god tier.
>>64023489
>Oasis are god tier
They were writing the same shitty SportsEventSingalong-tier song over and over and couldn't even play
>discover weezer today
>go to /mu/
>there is a weezer thread
What the fuck
>>64023538
There is literally always a Weezer thread on /mu/
>>64023206
But they think that Pinkerton is their best album, which is still a bit different. And the general consensus on best of the 90s is pretty much spider land, okc or itaots
>>64023518
You've clearly never listened to more than 3
Oasis songs
>muh fun and craetitivity xD
Weezer is literally Blink-182 with le sad and le deep lyrics and some (SOME) complex melodies (and remember, complex =/= good).
No one really gives a shit about your musical taste, nor does anyone feel the need to CLEANSE your likes.
That being said, Weezer is so fucking bland I can't believe it. Blue album is so incredibly boring and unoriginal it amazes me that the supposed "music savvies" of /mu/ even mention these fucks, let alone make them so important.
>>64023566
Dude...
Just stop
>>64023538
there's at least a 100 weezer threads a day
>>64023538
>discover weezer today
how
Weezer is just Oasis for american betas, you answered yourself
>>64023566
they are literally all the same song unless it's one of their generic acoustic singalongs, they're the fucking coldplay of the 90's
Oasis >>>>>>> Weezer
>>64023392
probably they agree with everything you have to say
>>64023763
This.. The Coldplay of the 90's, i liked that, it realy summarizes what i try to say when i tell people that i dont like Oasis, it's too cliche, comercial, and sometimes, girlly music
>>64023763
>they are literally all the same
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJKpUH2kJQg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDe1DqxwJoc&nohtml5=False
>>64023206
Were you like 2 years old in the 90s?
Both albums were hailed as great.
>if it's derivative, it's bad
>if it's pop, it's bad
When will this meme end?
>>64024687
>Were you like 2 years old in the 90s?
I would imagine 99% of this board were 2 at some point in the 90s, yes. Personally, I was 2 in 1995
>>64024736
At no point did I say it was bad, you just derived that from your own insecurity. I actually like both albums m8
>>64024767
>Personally, I was 2 in 1995
You think you should be allowed to comment on this then?
>At no point did I say it was bad
Your implications did. Don't be willfully ignorant.
>>64024786
>You think you should be allowed to comment on this then?
why wouldn't he be? he's commenting on the way the albums are treated and considered on /mu/ now, not in the early 90s. learn to read mongoloid.
>Don't be willfully ignorant.
you're the last person who should be allowed to say these words
>>64024786
I'm talking about how the albums are perceived today, not back then. My implications literally said the albums were catchy. I was pointing out their similarity while acknowledging they weren't exactly original. You come across as some weird insecure gen X-er. Go back to the 90s m8
>>64024815
>why wouldn't he be?
Lack of context, showing of obvious historical inaccuracy.
>considered on /mu/
Not relevant.
>you're the last person who should be allowed to say these words
What instrument do you play again?
>>64024856
>Not relevant.
it is relevant since that's what is being discussed? learn to fucking read already.
>>64024855
>I'm talking about how the albums are perceived today
Not relevant.
>My implications literally said the albums were catchy.
You also listed them as derivative, simple, reduced them both to "pop rock" and used the word "geetarz", not to mention a discrimination attacking the fanbase of both. Not sure if this is your first week on /mu/ but those are all pejoratives in this context.
If you are going to pretend you weren't twisting the attributes of these bands into a negative connotation, you are either a liar or retarded. Which is it?
>>64024883
>it is relevant since that's what is being discussed?
[citation needed]
>>64023206
Oasis are highly acclaimed and considered one of the greatest rock bands of their era. It's just the two brothers that cop heavy criticism.
>>64024890
>the subject of the discussion is not relevant to the discussion
yeah, you're the last person allowed to call someone a retard
>>64024904
see >>64023206
learn
to
read
>>64024918
>learn
>to
>read
Time frame is not stated.
Try again.
>>64024926
oh, you're autistic and unable to understand anything that isn't explicitly stated? sorry man, I didn't mean to be ableist.
>>64024943
I don't think you understand how communication works.
>>64024951
funny you'd say that, because everyone else except you did understand OP's statements. hmmmm...
>>64024970
That's because you are all autistic teenage non-musicians.
Continue to cry more about it though.
>>64025001
>embarrasses himself
>lets out a slew of ad hominems unrelated to the topic at hand
w e w
e
w
>>64023206
Oasis is much more derivative and bland than Weezer 2bh
They're also less competent musicians
As usual, America leads the way and the UK produces some watered down crap ten years later. Has Britain ever even independently developed a genre of pop music? Least creative country in all of music history, just look at their art music. If they're not ripping off former colonies then it's their immigrants aka the only source of culture on that godforsaken rainy shit-rock. They're so embarrassing
>>64025021
Ooops you meant to quote these guys >>64024943
>>64024918
Sorry about that!
>>64025021
>pointing out there is a bunch of people with a warped sense of reality?
>surely that's not related to everyone misinterpreting reality!
>>64025046
if by "leading the way" you mean "regurgitating mainland's europe's actually interesting output" then sure. agreed on the topic of british art though.
>>64023206
THIS is the worst album? Fuck no. Oasis is GOAT.
>>64025099
>"regurgitating mainland's europe's actually interesting output
Like what?
>>64025048
>he doesn't know the difference between ad hominem and an insult
you should just quit mate
>>64023206
Weezer could actually write good lyrics you delusional bong
>>64025120
Dat damage control.
>>64025127
>Weezer
>good lyrics
Hahahahhaha
oh wait, you're serious.
>>64023548
Why do people think Slint is better than Oasis? They both have loud guitar, bass, drums, and vocals. It's the same
>>64025167
>Why do people think Slint is better than Oasis?
Because an individual has a higher emotional response to Slint than Oasis.
....I love Oasis' first 2 albums.
They're nothing new, but they're perfect summer albums
>>64024906
this
they did, admittedly, a good job at condensing the raw sound of stone roses, charlatans etc. around before them, and filled a gap needed in the British indie music scene at the time. Plus the whole britpop palaver really played into the Gallagher brothers' egotistical hands
Both are fine.
Super Furry Animals was objectively the best band to come out of Britpop though.
>>64026707
I bought Radiator ages back and I love that album. I really wanna hear more of their stuff but I can't find it anywhere in good quality.
>>64023422
How about instead of just making brazen claims you actually back up your argument with actual fucking points and support? Don't just say random shit. Anyone can say anything has "Better songwriting, better production, better musicianship, better lyrics and vocals"
>hey what's better? radiohead or kanye?
>kanye man, better songwriting, better production, better musicianship, better lyrics and vocals
Seriously fuck off. I don't even care about this debate, I'm just sick you and people like you polluting /mu/ with you non-substantive know-it-all bullshitting.
>>64023206
I like both bands.
>>64027270
What are you some kind of faggot?
>>64023288
I loathe Oasis but literally every point this anon makes is spot on. I am available to Kevorkian any Weezer fans needing assistance.
>>64023206
I guess American virgins are more interesting.
>>64023392
That explains a lot
I like both.
