>Scaruffi finally comes back from the 2000s to review new albums
>releases the list for the month of April 2016, full of obscure shit no one has ever heard of getting 6's and 7's of course
>Painting With - 4/10
>Sleep Cycle - 8.5/10
>yfw
>Blackstar - 3/10
:(
>>63853357
>Memewie
I've heard that "12" is is highest rating.
literally who cares what some italian alzheimers pedophile thinks about music
WHY DOES HE NOT REVIEW MUSIC ANY MORE FUCK LET'S SPAM HIS EMAIL BRO
>>63853740
>anime
>>63853281
Accurate Scruffle score for PW, but I get the feeling Sleep Cycle would be a 6 for him. Maybe a 6.5 if he's feeling generous.
>"Dan Schneider interviewing piero"
>>63854475
dan "if you see the cops coming, hide her" schneider
piero "i get scruffy with minors" scaruffi
>>63854530
Is this Dan "the man with a plan (to rape)" Schneider we're talking about?
I actually hope with guy dies very painfully
>>63854744
That seems a little petty
>>63854594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16gT0lnSoew
>>63854744
let me guess, you're asshurt because of the Pet Sounds score? or is it Radiohead?
>all music that isn't obscure or weird is bad the reviewer
>>63855485
Yeah who the fuck ever heard of The Doors or Bob Dylan what a fucking hipster
>>63855525
>99% of reviews are bands nobody has heard of and the rest are bands he was pressured into making.
Keep defending your spaghetti nigger le trout mask XD!
>>63855485
And yet he chooses the plebiest of classical music. What gives?
>>63855571
Go to bed, Paul McCartney.
>>63855571
>bands nobody has ever heard of
wew lad, how new are you?
>>63855485
>>63855571
>being this pleb
>being this new
>being this mad
>>63855642
>>63855624
>>63855598
>>63855525
>>63855317
Defending dad rock reviewers
Worse than fagtano.
>>63853357
it's so fucking obvious he has some sort of negative personal bias against bowie
what a fucking shit critic
>>63855701
>Memewie
>good
>>63855679
>Scruffles
>dadrock reviewer
pick one
>>63853357
he's gonna give it a 5 or 6/10 and talk about how good the title track is while stressing that it's really "nothing special".
>>63856278
He already reviewed it.
>>63855595
plebiest of classical music = some of the only music deemed fit by academics to include in musical education for children
>>63856638
You got a link to that?
>>63855701
he actually outlines the origin of his bias against david bowie pretty clearly in his writing, though im sure he'd see that it's ultimately silly bias if he cared enough to reflect upon it. david bowie is overrated though, despite writing several god-tier songs.
>>63853357
Hes an Italian pedo faggot
>>63855485
http://www.scaruffi.com/vol3/springst.html
>>63853357
Not enough circus samples
DUDE MUH TROUT MASK REPLICA SO GOOD LOL YOU JUST DONT GET IT XD
a few years ago, i copied nearly his whole beatles essay for an english test (it's not my first language) in which we were supposed to write about music and got a B-
>scaroofie
>>63853758
Kek at that filename
>hates pleb music and plebs
>thinks originality and innovation is more important than flawless generic playing
>is for pushing boundries of music in general
>values emotions higher than technical wankery
>thinks beatles are overrated
>is a pedo
>doesnt give into media hype bullshit
>just gives his honest opinions about albums in a non-obnoxious way (unlike fagnato)
why do we hate him again?
>>63858860
he turned me onto some of my favourite albums. I only pay much attention to his positive opinions
>>63858860
because he beats 4chan at it's own game and it isn't even close
and anons are just about the most egotistical losers you could imagine
>>63853281
Fuck him. He's such a cunt
>>63858860
Who actually hates him?
>>63858955
no ur a cunt u ugly underage rubio voting bland taste having cuck of a pussy juice stain i fucked ur girls gums up cuz of the sheer speed of my cum hitting her wide mouth
>>63858935
This. A lot of what scaruffi hates is at least decent, but the majority of what he loves is fantastic. He's also a lot more clear on why he does or doesn't like things than fatnano
>>63858860
he can be good but he's also the ultimate contrarian
also he's really only good for rock reviews
>>63859854
>implying you should ever listen to jazz hiphop or classical
>>63859867
If I want to sure, I don't see why not. I more had his reviews of electronic shit in mind though.
>>63859867
ah yes, the four genres of music
>>63859652
that's where you're wrong my friend :) im all in for Jeb!
>>63859854
Except he's not. Sure, he's given some obscure albums really high scores but he's also praised some of the most popular albums that are praised by everyone else. And even for artists he doesn't really "like" (i.e Bowie and Beatles), he still has given them good scores on some albums.
>>63859940
I don't mind him having differing opinions on more popular stuff, and his more obscure stuff is what makes him unique. What I was meaning was shit like the fact that he hasn't rated an album from this millennium 10/10 and the general le wrong generation-esque implication I tend to get from his reviews that somehow newer music overall isn't as good as older music.
>>63859939
u /just/ here
>>63859936
there is 4 genres of music
folk
pop/rock
jazz
classical
hip hop isnt music calm down there buddy
>>63860004
Do you mean 9/10 because he doesn't give 10s but I understand what you mean. For what it's worth, he gave Joanna Newsom's Have One on Me a 8.5/10 which is absurdly good according to his standards.
>>63860088
I could've sworn that in his top albums of all time list he gave four or five albums a 10.
>>63860178
9.5 is his highest score ever, to trout mask replica
>>63860178
9.5 is as high as he goes
>>63860186
>>63860194
just checked and I could've sworn I had seen a top 100 albums list with tens at the top, but the one I found doesn't as you said and looks nothing like I remembered. I guess I'm just retarded, oh well.
>>63860084
this desu famalamiano
>>63860186
also 9.5 to Faust s/t and Rock Bottom
>>63855701
And the Beatles
The bias in his 'analysis' is so obvious that I'm impressed at how many /mu/tants take him seriously. Guess it's all in the name of contrarianism.
>>63862048
lol no way
I think the bias is actually in the mind of all beatles fans, because his criticism is full of facts to back it up
