Why do people like this shit again?
It's fucking terrible, the instrumental for Gosh sounds like a baby pigeon crying in pain for a split-second.
OH MY GOSH
AYZEE AYZEE
HOL IT DAN HOL IT DAN
>>63853241
I don't even know man, horrible album
>>63853241
Gosh is actually only the good song on the album
>>63853241
>what is good mix engineering
>what is good production
>what is sampling with meaning
>i only prefer surface-tier listenings
anything else you want to say about yourself?
>>63853300
Well in the end if it sounds like shit none of that stuff matters
>>63853342
>i only prefer surface-tier listenings
you already said that
>>63853300
Living Colour doesn't have any of the qualities you just mentioned though
It's a wholly aesthetic listen and when it does actually introduce subtext it's so blatant and spoonfed an 8 year old could tell what it was saying
>>63853373
In* i was looking at the word living and typed it
>>63853373
You tryna talk shit bout my Cult of Personality Guitar Hero III feels senpai
>>63853373
its like you read the liner notes but don't know who those people/sample sources are.
>>63853241
I respect jamie xx. but this record is only popular around folks who aren't really into dance music
basically the p4k crowd.Gets very bland on repeated listens only good track was the thugger feature and that got old quick too.
>>63853483
posh schoolboy xx was about as far removed from those sources as possible
>>63853598
Is this supposed to be dance music?
>>63853598
>folks who aren't really into dance music
the entire album is a subliminal shout out to people that paved the way for dance music
>>63853960
But the people who enjoyed it the most were the crowd he was talking about.
>>63854069
[citation needed]
>>63854609
https://www.residentadvisor.net/review-view.aspx?id=17013
>What we're left with is an uneven album that's rarely as profound or as meaningful as it tries to be. In Colour's core thread of raver nostalgia simply dissolves on contact. If he had anything enlightening or unique to add to his misty-eyed tributes, it'd be different, but he seems content to slip out a stream of clichés and call it a day. I've always viewed Smith as an artist who, instead of adding to the dialogue, repackages what's already been said in a simpler way. In Colour hasn't changed my mind about that
>>63854694
andrew rice is a terribly bias reviewer tho
>>63853241
It's because most xx fans have never heard deep house so every track was "OMG THIS IS NUTS" tier for them.
It happens whenever someone crosses over
>>63854694
>raver nostalgia
Are any of the songs considered rave? I thought they were like electronic ambient songs with some intricate beats.
>>63853241
It's p4k core, no one actually likes it.
>>63854855
Not to be mean. but you know ambient is already part of the electronic family right?
This album is deep house. there's different type of rave music ladhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rave_music
I think the album is dandy/10
>>63854941
>>63854855
>>63854694
>raver nostalgia
literally wat
more like garage and disco nostalgia
>>63854654
I think I just got cancer
